Ding et al. [1] recently published a paper on GEIRA, a gene-environment and gene–gene
interaction research application. The authors developed a program in SAS and R to
calculate interactions on an additive and multiplicative scale. We want to compliment
the authors on providing such a useful tool, which may accommodate more frequent calculation
of interaction on an additive scale. However, there is one flaw in the program, which
the authors only partly acknowledge, that we would like to address. Measures of interaction
on an additive scale, such as the proportion attributable to interaction (AP), cannot
be validly calculated if any of the odds ratios of the independent and joint effects
is smaller than 1, i.e. preventive [2]. The authors state in the discussion section
that: “[] the OR associated with the genetic factor might still be less than 1 among
subjects unexposed to the environmental factor. In this case, the interpretation for
interaction should be cautious”. We think that ‘caution’ is not enough; in this case,
the calculations should just not be performed. Fortunately, there is an easy solution
to get valid estimates for measures of interaction on an additive scale when having
preventive exposures by appropriately recoding one or both of the exposures. We have
described this in detail elsewhere for general measures of additive interaction [2].
Tests for specific forms of antagonism may, however, require different forms of recoding
[3].
The reason why using odds ratios smaller than 1 gives wrong results in the measures
of interaction on an additive scale is because an odds ratio is restricted between
0 and 1 for a preventive factor while it can go from 1 to infinity for a risk factor.
For example, an odds ratio of 0.60 means a relative risk reduction of 40%, whereas
the inverse (1/0.60 = 1.67) means a relative increase in risk of 67%. If 0.60 is used
in calculating a measure of additive interaction this leads to different results than
if 1.67 is used in calculating the interaction. Moreover, with preventive exposures,
measures such as the relative excess risk due to interaction or the attributable proportion
can give results that are in the opposite direction of other additive interaction
measures such as the synergy index [2].
A simple solution for the problem is recoding the variables in such a way that the
stratum with the lowest risk when both factors are considered jointly becomes the
reference category. The result of this recoding is that for one or both factors the
absence of the exposure (rather than the presence) becomes the risk factor for the
outcome. If factors are recoded one at a time, rather than jointly as we suggest,
this can again result in invalid measures of interaction on an additive scale [2].
The authors of GEIRA might consider incorporating a recoding scheme in their program
to prevent mistakes from being made when calculating measures of interaction on an
additive scale with odds ratios smaller than 1. Alternatively, users of GEIRA could
carry out this recoding themselves and apply GEIRA subsequently. Caution is always
needed in interpreting the interaction after recoding as the exposure is changed to
its opposite.
References
Ding B, Kallberg H, Klareskog L, Padyukov L, Alfredsson L. GEIRA: gene-environment
and gene–gene interaction research application. Eur J Epidemiol 2011; 26: 557-561.
Knol MJ, Vanderweele TJ, Groenwold RH, Klungel OH, Rovers MM, Grobbee DE. Estimating
measures of interaction on an additive scale for preventive exposures. Eur J Epidemiol
2011; 26: 433-438.
Vanderweele TJ, Knol MJ. Remarks on antagonism. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 173: 1140-1147.
The Authors’ Reply
Bo Ding, Henrik Källberg, Lars Alfredsson
Institute of Environmental Medicine,
Karolinska Institutet,
Box 210,
171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
We are grateful to Knol and VanderWeele for having drawn attention to an ambiguity
when calculating measures of interaction on an additive scale when any of the interacting
factors is preventive [1]. If factors are coded one at a time without considering
their joint effect, different measures of interaction may give incompatible results.
We agree that our comments of this problem were incomplete and unsatisfactory in our
article [2]. Knol and VanderWeele has timely shown that recoding of preventive factors
by choosing the stratum with the lowest risk when both factors are considered jointly
as the reference category solves the problem [3]. We agree that their suggestion solves
the problem and will generate valid measures of interaction on an additive scale.
We have now updated the GEIRA program to automate the recoding procedure (GEIRA version
2.0). A flag variable “recoding” will indicate which factor (environment, gene or
both) was recoded.
References
Knol MJ, VanderWeele. Recoding preventive exposures to get valid measures of interaction
on an additive scale. Eur J Epidemiol. 2011.
Ding B, Källberg H, Klareskog L, Padyukov L, Alfredsson L. GEIRA:gene-environment
and gene–gene interaction research application. Eur J Epidemiol. 2011. Jul;26(7):557-61.
Knol MJ, Vanderweele TJ, Groenwold RH, Klungel OH, Rovers MM, Grobbee DE. Estimating
measures of interaction on an additive scale for preventive exposures. Eur J Epidemiol.
2011 Jun;26(6):433-8.