89
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Pulsatile blood flow through the cavities of the heart and great vessels is time-varying and multidirectional. Access to all regions, phases and directions of cardiovascular flows has formerly been limited. Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has enabled more comprehensive access to such flows, with typical spatial resolution of 1.5×1.5×1.5 – 3×3×3 mm 3, typical temporal resolution of 30–40 ms, and acquisition times in the order of 5 to 25 min. This consensus paper is the work of physicists, physicians and biomedical engineers, active in the development and implementation of 4D Flow CMR, who have repeatedly met to share experience and ideas. The paper aims to assist understanding of acquisition and analysis methods, and their potential clinical applications with a focus on the heart and greater vessels. We describe that 4D Flow CMR can be clinically advantageous because placement of a single acquisition volume is straightforward and enables flow through any plane across it to be calculated retrospectively and with good accuracy. We also specify research and development goals that have yet to be satisfactorily achieved. Derived flow parameters, generally needing further development or validation for clinical use, include measurements of wall shear stress, pressure difference, turbulent kinetic energy, and intracardiac flow components. The dependence of measurement accuracy on acquisition parameters is considered, as are the uses of different visualization strategies for appropriate representation of time-varying multidirectional flow fields. Finally, we offer suggestions for more consistent, user-friendly implementation of 4D Flow CMR acquisition and data handling with a view to multicenter studies and more widespread adoption of the approach in routine clinical investigations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references177

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Asymmetric redirection of flow through the heart.

          Through cardiac looping during embryonic development, paths of flow through the mature heart have direction changes and asymmetries whose topology and functional significance remain relatively unexplored. Here we show, using magnetic resonance velocity mapping, the asymmetric redirection of streaming blood in atrial and ventricular cavities of the adult human heart, with sinuous, chirally asymmetric paths of flow through the whole. On the basis of mapped flow fields and drawings that illustrate spatial relations between flow paths, we propose that asymmetries and curvatures of the looped heart have potential fluidic and dynamic advantages. Patterns of atrial filling seem to be asymmetric in a manner that allows the momentum of inflowing streams to be redirected towards atrio-ventricular valves, and the change in direction at ventricular level is such that recoil away from ejected blood is in a direction that can enhance rather than inhibit ventriculo-atrial coupling. Chiral asymmetry might help to minimize dissipative interaction between entering, recirculating and outflowing streams. These factors might combine to allow a reciprocating, sling-like, 'morphodynamic' mode of action to come into effect when heart rate and output increase during exercise.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Bicuspid aortic valve is associated with altered wall shear stress in the ascending aorta.

            Hemodynamics may play a role contributing to the progression of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) aortopathy. This study measured the impact of BAV on the distribution of regional aortic wall shear stress (WSS) compared with control cohorts. Local WSS distribution was measured in the thoracic aorta of 60 subjects using 4-dimensional (4D) flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging. WSS analysis included 15 BAV patients: 12 with fusion of the right-left coronary cusp (6 stenotic) and 3 with fusion of the right and noncoronary cusp. The right-left BAV cohort was compared with healthy subjects (n=15), age-appropriate subjects (n=15), and age-/aorta size-controlled subjects (n=15). Compared with the age-appropriate and age-/aorta size-matched controls, WSS patterns in the right-left BAV ascending aorta were significantly elevated, independent of stenosis severity (peak WSS=0.9 ± 0.3 N/m(2) compared with 0.4 ± 0.3 N/m(2) in age-/aorta size-controlled subjects; P<0.001). Time-resolved (cine) 2D images of the bicuspid valves were coregistered with 4D flow data, directly linking cusp fusion pattern to a distinct ascending aortic flow jet pattern. The observation of right-anterior ascending aorta wall/jet impingement in right-left BAV patients corresponded to regions with statistically elevated WSS. Alternative jetting patterns were observed in the right and noncoronary cusp fusion patients. The results of this study demonstrate that bicuspid valves induced significantly altered ascending aorta hemodynamics compared with age- and size-matched controls with tricuspid valves. Specifically, the expression of increased and asymmetric WSS at the aorta wall was related to ascending aortic flow jet patterns, which were influenced by the BAV fusion pattern.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Aortic dilation in bicuspid aortic valve disease: flow pattern is a major contributor and differs with valve fusion type.

              Ascending aortic dilation is important in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease, with increased risk of aortic dissection. We used cardiovascular MR to understand the pathophysiology better by examining the links between 3-dimensional flow abnormalities, aortic function, and aortic dilation. A total of 142 subjects underwent cardiovascular MR (mean age, 40 years; 95 with BAV, 47 healthy volunteers). Patients with BAV had predominantly abnormal right-handed helical flow in the ascending aorta, larger ascending aortas (18.3±3.3 versus 15.2±2.2 mm/m²; P<0.001), and higher rotational (helical) flow (31.7±15.8 versus 2.9±3.9 mm²/s; P<0.001), systolic flow angle (23.1°±12.5° versus 7.0°±4.6°; P<0.001), and systolic wall shear stress (0.85±0.28 versus 0.59±0.17 N/m²; P<0.001) compared with healthy volunteers. BAV with right-handed flow and right-non coronary cusp fusion (n=31) showed more severe flow abnormalities (rotational flow, 38.5±16.5 versus 27.8±12.4 mm²/s; P<0.001; systolic flow angle, 29.4°±10.9° versus 19.4°±11.4°; P<0.001; in-plane wall shear stress, 0.64±0.23 versus 0.47±0.22 N/m²; P<0.001) and larger aortas (19.5±3.4 versus 17.5±3.1 mm/m²; P<0.05) than right-left cusp fusion (n=55). Patients with BAV with normal flow patterns had similar aortic dimensions and wall shear stress to healthy volunteers and younger patients with BAV showed abnormal flow patterns but no aortic dilation, both further supporting the importance of flow pattern in the pathogenesis of aortic dilation. Aortic function measures (distensibility, aortic strain, and pulse wave velocity) were similar across all groups. Flow abnormalities may be a major contributor to aortic dilation in BAV. Fusion type affects the severity of flow abnormalities and may allow better risk prediction and selection of patients for earlier surgical intervention.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                petter.dyverfeldt@liu.se
                malenka.bissell@cardiov.ox.ac.uk
                alex.barker@northwestern.edu
                abolger@medsfgh.ucsf.edu
                carljohan.carlhall@liu.se
                tino.ebbers@liu.se
                cfrancois@uwhealth.org
                alex.frydrychowicz@uksh.de
                julia.geiger@kispi.uzh.ch
                daniel.giese@uk-koeln.de
                mdhope@stanfordalumni.org
                p.kilner@rbht.nhs.uk
                kozerke@biomed.ee.ethz.ch
                saul.myerson@cardiov.ox.ac.uk
                stefan.neubauer@cardiov.ox.ac.uk
                owieben@wisc.edu
                mmarkl@northwestern.edu
                Journal
                J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
                J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
                Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
                BioMed Central (London )
                1097-6647
                1532-429X
                10 August 2015
                10 August 2015
                2015
                : 17
                : 1
                : 72
                Affiliations
                [ ]Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
                [ ]Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
                [ ]Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Oxford, UK
                [ ]Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
                [ ]Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA United States
                [ ]Department of Clinical Physiology, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
                [ ]Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin USA
                [ ]Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
                [ ]Department of Radiology, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
                [ ]Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
                [ ]Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA United States
                [ ]NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
                [ ]Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
                [ ]Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin USA
                [ ]Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
                Article
                174
                10.1186/s12968-015-0174-5
                4530492
                26257141
                145123d7-8646-4087-a038-a0b2ad4a3a05
                © Dyverfeldt et al. 2015

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 24 March 2015
                : 17 July 2015
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                4d flow cmr,4d flow mri,phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging,mr flow imaging,hemodynamics,flow visualization,flow quantification,recommendations,clinical,cardiovascular

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content28

                Cited by247

                Most referenced authors1,404