11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Quantitative Autonomic Testing

      research-article
      Journal of Visualized Experiments : JoVE
      MyJove Corporation

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Disorders associated with dysfunction of autonomic nervous system are quite common yet frequently unrecognized. Quantitative autonomic testing can be invaluable tool for evaluation of these disorders, both in clinic and research. There are number of autonomic tests, however, only few were validated clinically or are quantitative. Here, fully quantitative and clinically validated protocol for testing of autonomic functions is presented. As a bare minimum the clinical autonomic laboratory should have a tilt table, ECG monitor, continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitor, respiratory monitor and a mean for evaluation of sudomotor domain. The software for recording and evaluation of autonomic tests is critical for correct evaluation of data. The presented protocol evaluates 3 major autonomic domains: cardiovagal, adrenergic and sudomotor. The tests include deep breathing, Valsalva maneuver, head-up tilt, and quantitative sudomotor axon test (QSART). The severity and distribution of dysautonomia is quantitated using Composite Autonomic Severity Scores (CASS). Detailed protocol is provided highlighting essential aspects of testing with emphasis on proper data acquisition, obtaining the relevant parameters and unbiased evaluation of autonomic signals. The normative data and CASS algorithm for interpretation of results are provided as well.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Composite autonomic scoring scale for laboratory quantification of generalized autonomic failure.

          An autonomic reflex screen, which consisted of a quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test, orthostatic blood pressure and heart rate response to tilt, heart rate response to deep breathing, the Valsalva ratio, and beat-to-beat blood pressure measurements during phases II and IV of the Valsalva maneuver, tilt, and deep breathing, was used to develop a 10-point composite autonomic scoring scale of autonomic function. The scheme allots 4 points for adrenergic and 3 points each for sudomotor and cardiovagal failure. Each score is normalized for the compounding effects of age and sex. Patients with a score of 3 or less on the composite autonomic scoring scale have only mild autonomic failure, those with scores of 7 to 10 have severe failure, and those with scores between these two ranges have moderate autonomic failure. The sensitivity and specificity of the method were assessed by evaluating the composite autonomic scoring scale in four groups of patients with known degrees of autonomic failure: 18 with multisystem atrophy, 20 with autonomic neuropathy, 20 with Parkinson's disease, and 20 with peripheral neuropathy but no autonomic symptoms. The composite scores (means +/- SD) for these four groups, respectively, were as follows: 8.5 +/- 1.3, 8.6 +/- 1.2, 1.5 +/- 1.1, and 1.7 +/- 1.3. Patients with symptomatic autonomic failure had scores of 5 or more, those without symptomatic autonomic failure had scores of 4 or less, and no overlap existed in these groups. Thus, autonomic laboratory tests should be useful in grading the degree of autonomic failure.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effect of age and gender on sudomotor and cardiovagal function and blood pressure response to tilt in normal subjects.

            Normative data are limited on autonomic function tests, especially beyond age 60 years. We therefore evaluated these tests in a total of 557 normal subjects evenly distributed by age and gender from 10 to 83 years. Heart rate (HR) response to deep breathing fell with increasing age. Valsalva ratio varied with both age and gender. QSART (quantitative sudomotor axon-reflex test) volume was consistently greater in men (approximately double) and progressively declined with age for all three lower extremity sites but not the forearm site. Orthostatic blood pressure reduction was greater with increasing age. HR at rest was significantly higher in women, and the increment with head-up tilt fell with increasing age. For no tests did we find a regression to zero, and some tests seem to level off with increasing age, indicating that diagnosis of autonomic failure was possible to over 80 years of age.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Laboratory evaluation of autonomic function.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Vis Exp
                JoVE
                Journal of Visualized Experiments : JoVE
                MyJove Corporation
                1940-087X
                2011
                19 July 2011
                19 July 2011
                : 53
                : 2502
                Affiliations
                Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School
                Author notes

                Correspondence to: Peter Novak at novakp@ 123456ummhc.org

                Article
                2502
                10.3791/2502
                3196175
                21788940
                142aebdf-daba-4751-b25b-20b2ffa7afc6
                Copyright © 2011, Journal of Visualized Experiments

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Medicine

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article