Electrochemical Skin Conductance Correlates with Skin Nerve Fiber Density

Small fibre neuropathy (SFN), a condition dominated by neuropathic pain, is frequently encountered in clinical practise either as prevalent manifestation of more diffuse neuropathy or distinct nosologic entity. Aetiology of SFN includes pre-diabetes status and immune-mediated diseases, though it remains frequently unknown. Due to their physiologic characteristics, small nerve fibres cannot be investigated by routine electrophysiological tests, making the diagnosis particularly difficult. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess the psychophysical thresholds for cold and warm sensations and skin biopsy with quantification of somatic intraepidermal nerve fibres (IENF) have been used to determine the damage to small nerve fibres. Nevertheless, the diagnostic criteria for SFN have not been defined yet and a ‘gold standard’ for clinical practise and research is not available. We screened 486 patients referred to our institutions and collected 124 patients with sensory neuropathy. Among them, we identified 67 patients with pure SFN using a new diagnostic ‘gold standard’, based on the presence of at least two abnormal results at clinical, QST and skin biopsy examination. The diagnosis of SFN was achieved by abnormal clinical and skin biopsy findings in 43.3% of patients, abnormal skin biopsy and QST findings in 37.3% of patients, abnormal clinical and QST findings in 11.9% of patients, whereas 7.5% patients had abnormal results at all the examinations. Skin biopsy showed a diagnostic efficiency of 88.4%, clinical examination of 54.6% and QST of 46.9%. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis confirmed the significantly higher performance of skin biopsy comparing with QST. However, we found a significant inverse correlation between IENF density and both cold and warm thresholds at the leg. Clinical examination revealed pinprick and thermal hypoesthesia in about 50% patients, and signs of peripheral vascular autonomic dysfunction in about 70% of patients. Spontaneous pain dominated the clinical picture in most SFN patients. Neuropathic pain intensity was more severe in patients with SFN than in patients with large or mixed fibre neuropathy, but there was no significant correlation with IENF density. The aetiology of SFN was initially unknown in 41.8% of patients and at 2-year follow-up a potential cause could be determined in 25% of them. Over the same period, 13% of SFN patients showed the involvement of large nerve fibres, whereas in 45.6% of them the clinical picture did not change. Spontaneous remission of neuropathic pain occurred in 10.9% of SFN patients, while it worsened in 30.4% of them.

Small-fibre neuropathy (SFN), a disorder of thinly myelinated Aδ-fibres and unmyelinated C-fibres, is clinically characterized by neuropathic pain symptoms and autonomic complaints. Diagnosis of SFN is challenging as the clinical picture can be difficult to interpret and results from nerve conduction studies are often normal. In cases of suspected SFN, measurement of intraepidermal nerve fibre density and/or analysis of quantitative sensory testing can enable diagnosis. New diagnostic techniques (including measurement of nerve fibre density using corneal confocal microscopy, and nociceptive evoked potentials) may contribute to the diagnostic work-up. SFN can be associated with systemic diseases such as immune-mediated disorders, but remains idiopathic in a substantial proportion of patients. Gain-of-function variants in the Na(v)1.7 sodium channel have recently been found in nearly 30% of patients with idiopathic SFN, but the mechanisms of axonal degeneration in the disorder remain under investigation. Identification of the systemic diseases underlying SFN will enable development of drugs that target affected pathways to improve the management of neuropathic pain and autonomic dysfunction. In this Review, we discuss recent advances in the diagnosis and pathophysiology of SFN, highlighting how improved understanding of these aspects of the disorder will contribute to better patient management.

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a neuropathy sensory symptom scale, the Neuropathy Total Symptom Score-6 (NTSS-6), which evaluates individual neuropathy sensory symptoms in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in clinical trials, with the intent of distinguishing a response to therapy. The NTSS-6 questionnaire was developed to evaluate the frequency and intensity of individual neuropathy sensory symptoms identified frequently by patients with DPN (ie, numbness and/or insensitivity; prickling and/or tingling sensation; burning sensation; aching pain and/or tightness; sharp, shooting, lancinating pain; and allodynia and/or hyperalgesia). The NTSS-6 was administered 8 times over a 1-year period to DPN patients. The NTSS-6's reliability (determined by internal consistency and test-retest reproducibility), construct validity, convergent validity, and minimally clinically important differences (MCIDs) were determined. The NTSS-6 was administered to a total of 205 patients at 10 centers in the United States, Canada, Belgium, Germany, Hungary, Croatia, Slovenia, and the United Kingdom. Internal consistency was demonstrated at all 8 visits (Cronbach's alpha > 0.7). Test-retest reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.9) was observed during the baseline period and at end point. Construct validity was demonstrated by statistically significant correlations between the NTSS-6 total score and the Neuropathy Symptoms and Change (NSC) score (r = 0.773-0.885, P < 0.001). Convergent validity was demonstrated by statistically significant correlations between the change in NTSS-6 total scores and the following: change in NSC scores (r = 0.519-0.708, P < 0.001); change in Neuropathy Impairment Score of the Lower Limbs and composite nerve function scores (r = 0.188-0.202, P < 0.007), and categories of the Clinical Global Impressions (r = 0.402, P < 0.001). The within- and between-groups MCIDs for the total NTSS-6 total scores were -1.26 and 0.97 points, respectively. The mean (SD) within-group MCID for all patients who improved on the Clinical Global Impression was -2.29 (3.4) points. The NTSS-6 provided a valid assessment of neuropathy sensory symptoms in this sample of patients with DM and DPN, which suggests that it may be useful for symptom evaluation in clinical trials and practice. The NTSS-6 showed internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity. There was also convergent validity of the scores, indicating that the NTSS-6 may be a suitable questionnaire for clinical trials that evaluate symptoms of DPN in this well-defined patient population.