2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Does Sickle Cell Disease Protect against HIV Infection: A Systematic Review

      systematic-review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The aim of this systematic review was to investigate whether sickle cell disease (SCD) protects against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection by determining the association between SCD and the incidence and virulence of HIV infection.

          Methods

          This is a systematic review that used MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, and Academic Search Complete as data sources. Articles describing the relationship of SCD with HIV infection were included in this review. The effect measures were converted to correlation coefficients and synthesized accordingly to examine the putative protective role of SCD against HIV infection. Independent full-text screening and data extraction were conducted on all eligible studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the mixed methods appraisal tool. We employed a random-effects model of meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence. We computed Cochrane's Q statistics, I<sup>2</sup>, and prediction interval to quantify effect size heterogeneity.

          Results

          SCD reduces the risk of HIV infection by 75% (odds ratio [OR] = 0.25; r = −0.36, p < 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 71.65). There was no publication bias (Egger's t value = 0.411; p = 0.721). Similarly, risk of HIV virulence was reduced by 77% (OR = 0.23; r = −0.38; p < 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 63.07). The mechanisms implicated in the protective influence of SCD include autosplenectomy, reduced CCR5 expression, and increased expression of heme and iron-regulated genes.

          Conclusions

          SCD appears to protect against HIV infection and slows HIV progression.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.

          Protocols of systematic reviews and meta-analyses allow for planning and documentation of review methods, act as a guard against arbitrary decision making during review conduct, enable readers to assess for the presence of selective reporting against completed reviews, and, when made publicly available, reduce duplication of efforts and potentially prompt collaboration. Evidence documenting the existence of selective reporting and excessive duplication of reviews on the same or similar topics is accumulating and many calls have been made in support of the documentation and public availability of review protocols. Several efforts have emerged in recent years to rectify these problems, including development of an international register for prospective reviews (PROSPERO) and launch of the first open access journal dedicated to the exclusive publication of systematic review products, including protocols (BioMed Central's Systematic Reviews). Furthering these efforts and building on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines, an international group of experts has created a guideline to improve the transparency, accuracy, completeness, and frequency of documented systematic review and meta-analysis protocols--PRISMA-P (for protocols) 2015. The PRISMA-P checklist contains 17 items considered to be essential and minimum components of a systematic review or meta-analysis protocol.This PRISMA-P 2015 Explanation and Elaboration paper provides readers with a full understanding of and evidence about the necessity of each item as well as a model example from an existing published protocol. This paper should be read together with the PRISMA-P 2015 statement. Systematic review authors and assessors are strongly encouraged to make use of PRISMA-P when drafting and appraising review protocols. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2014.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sickle Cell Disease

            New England Journal of Medicine, 376(16), 1561-1573
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              HIV entry and its inhibition.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Med Princ Pract
                Med Princ Pract
                MPP
                Medical Principles and Practice
                S. Karger AG (Allschwilerstrasse 10, P.O. Box · Postfach · Case postale, CH–4009, Basel, Switzerland · Schweiz · Suisse, Phone: +41 61 306 11 11, Fax: +41 61 306 12 34, karger@karger.com )
                1011-7571
                1423-0151
                January 2023
                12 September 2022
                12 September 2022
                : 31
                : 6
                : 516-523
                Affiliations
                [1] aDepartment of Haematology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu, Nigeria
                [2] bFledgelight Evidence Consult, Enugu, Nigeria
                [3] cPhysiotherapy Department, Evangel University Akaeze, Ebonyi State, Nigeria
                Author notes
                *Angela Ogechukwu Ugwu, oge_ezeh@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                mpp-0031-0516
                10.1159/000526993
                9841758
                36096094
                0ea96b23-dcd8-4766-83a6-3eae5ac4c506
                Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

                This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission.

                History
                : 27 May 2022
                : 22 August 2022
                : 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, References: 48, Pages: 8
                Funding
                The funding for this study was provided by the first and second authors. No external source of funding was received.
                Categories
                Systematic Review

                sickle cell disease,human immunodeficiency virus

                Comments

                Comment on this article