Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Programmed Death Ligand-1 and Tumor Mutation Burden Testing of Patients With Lung Cancer for Selection of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapies: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Pulmonary Pathology Society, and LUNGevity Foundation

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Context.—

          Rapid advancements in the understanding and manipulation of tumor-immune interactions have led to the approval of immune therapies for patients with non–small cell lung cancer. Certain immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies require the use of companion diagnostics, but methodologic variability has led to uncertainty around test selection and implementation in practice.

          Objective.—

          To develop evidence-based guideline recommendations for the testing of immunotherapy/immunomodulatory biomarkers, including programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and tumor mutation burden (TMB), in patients with lung cancer.

          Design.—

          The College of American Pathologists convened a panel of experts in non–small cell lung cancer and biomarker testing to develop evidence-based recommendations in accordance with the standards for trustworthy clinical practice guidelines established by the National Academy of Medicine. A systematic literature review was conducted to address 8 key questions. Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, recommendations were created from the available evidence, certainty of that evidence, and key judgments as defined in the GRADE Evidence to Decision framework.

          Results.—

          Six recommendation statements were developed.

          Conclusions.—

          This guideline summarizes the current understanding and hurdles associated with the use of PD-L1 expression and TMB testing for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy selection in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer and presents evidence-based recommendations for PD-L1 and TMB testing in the clinical setting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references166

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

          Nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 programmed death 1 (PD-1) immune-checkpoint-inhibitor antibody, disrupts PD-1-mediated signaling and may restore antitumor immunity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

            New England Journal of Medicine, 373(2), 123-135
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial.

              Despite recent advances in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, there remains a need for effective treatments for progressive disease. We assessed the efficacy of pembrolizumab for patients with previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
                Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
                1543-2165
                0003-9985
                July 01 2024
                April 16 2024
                July 01 2024
                April 16 2024
                : 148
                : 7
                : 757-774
                Article
                10.5858/arpa.2023-0536-CP
                38625026
                06dd6ed7-cddc-4219-9616-35a7f8e1d6de
                © 2024
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content56

                Cited by7

                Most referenced authors3,904