21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Global yellow fever vaccination coverage from 1970 to 2016: an adjusted retrospective analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Substantial outbreaks of yellow fever in Angola and Brazil in the past 2 years, combined with global shortages in vaccine stockpiles, highlight a pressing need to assess present control strategies. The aims of this study were to estimate global yellow fever vaccination coverage from 1970 through to 2016 at high spatial resolution and to calculate the number of individuals still requiring vaccination to reach population coverage thresholds for outbreak prevention.

          Methods

          For this adjusted retrospective analysis, we compiled data from a range of sources (eg, WHO reports and health-service-provider registeries) reporting on yellow fever vaccination activities between May 1, 1939, and Oct 29, 2016. To account for uncertainty in how vaccine campaigns were targeted, we calculated three population coverage values to encompass alternative scenarios. We combined these data with demographic information and tracked vaccination coverage through time to estimate the proportion of the population who had ever received a yellow fever vaccine for each second level administrative division across countries at risk of yellow fever virus transmission from 1970 to 2016.

          Findings

          Overall, substantial increases in vaccine coverage have occurred since 1970, but notable gaps still exist in contemporary coverage within yellow fever risk zones. We estimate that between 393·7 million and 472·9 million people still require vaccination in areas at risk of yellow fever virus transmission to achieve the 80% population coverage threshold recommended by WHO; this represents between 43% and 52% of the population within yellow fever risk zones, compared with between 66% and 76% of the population who would have required vaccination in 1970.

          Interpretation

          Our results highlight important gaps in yellow fever vaccination coverage, can contribute to improved quantification of outbreak risk, and help to guide planning of future vaccination efforts and emergency stockpiling.

          Funding

          The Rhodes Trust, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, the National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health, the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          WHO and UNICEF estimates of national infant immunization coverage: methods and processes.

          WHO and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) annually review data on immunization coverage to estimate national coverage with routine service delivery of the following vaccines: bacille Calmette-Guérin; diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis, first and third doses; either oral polio vaccine or inactivated polio vaccine, third dose of either; hepatitis B, third dose; Haemophilus influenzae type b, third dose; and a measles virus-containing vaccine, either for measles alone or in the form of a combination vaccine, one dose. The estimates are based on government reports submitted to WHO and UNICEF and are supplemented by survey results from the published and grey literature. Local experts, primarily national immunization system managers and WHO/UNICEF regional and national staff, are consulted for additional information on the performance of specific immunization systems. Estimates are derived through a country-by-country review of available data informed and constrained by a set of heuristics; no statistical or mathematical models are used. Draft estimates are made, sent to national authorities for review and comment and modified in light of their feedback. While the final estimates may not differ from reported data, they constitute an independent technical assessment by WHO and UNICEF of the performance of national immunization systems. These country-specific estimates, available from 1980 onward, are updated annually.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Yellow Fever — Once Again on the Radar Screen in the Americas

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Yellow Fever in Angola and Beyond--The Problem of Vaccine Supply and Demand.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lancet Infect Dis
                Lancet Infect Dis
                The Lancet. Infectious Diseases
                Elsevier Science ;, The Lancet Pub. Group
                1473-3099
                1474-4457
                1 November 2017
                November 2017
                : 17
                : 11
                : 1209-1217
                Affiliations
                [a ]Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [b ]Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [c ]Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
                [d ]Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
                [e ]Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
                [f ]Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
                [g ]University of State of Rio de Janeiro, Maracana, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
                [h ]Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                [i ]Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
                [j ]Initiative for Vaccine Research, Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
                [k ]Infectious Hazard Management, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
                [l ]Secretariat of Health Surveillance of the Ministry of Health of Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
                [m ]Quantitative & Applied Ecology Group, School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Miss Freya M Shearer, Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UKCorrespondence to: Miss Freya M ShearerBig Data InstituteLi Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and DiscoveryUniversity of OxfordOxfordOX3 7LFUK freya.m.shearer@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S1473-3099(17)30419-X
                10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30419-X
                5666204
                28822780
                003f8a59-aa58-4256-b737-fd995e48bc31
                © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article