9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      On P300 measurement stability: habituation, intra-trial block variation, and ultradian rhythms

      ,
      Biological Psychology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          P300 event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were elicited using a simple discrimination task in which participants discriminated two different equiprobable visual stimuli with button-press responses (n = 20). A total of ten trial blocks were presented at 10-min intervals. P300 amplitude declined significantly, but peak latency did not change reliably across trial blocks. P300 amplitude demonstrated a reliable cyclical fluctuation across trial blocks, although P300 latency did not. Intra-trial block ERP variability was assessed by computing the correlation coefficients between the target and standard stimuli for amplitude and latency measures across participants within each trial block. P300 amplitude correlations were weakest at the Fz electrode, more strongly associated at Cz, and were most strongly correlated at Pz across trial blocks. P300 latency correlations were somewhat weaker and similar in strength across electrodes sites. The correlational patterns for both P300 amplitude and latency demonstrated reliable cyclical variation. The N100 component produced strong and consistent correlations for both amplitude and latency, whereas the P200 and N200 component measures evinced cyclical correlational patterns similar to the P300 across trial blocks. These results suggest that the stability of P300 and other component measures can vary appreciably within and across trial blocks in a manner that reflects ultradian variation in arousal level.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Biological Psychology
          Biological Psychology
          Elsevier BV
          03010511
          October 1999
          October 1999
          : 51
          : 1
          : 59-76
          Article
          10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00015-0
          977a259d-83e2-4893-9eea-14668cf55566
          © 1999

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article