8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Tracking tumour evolution in glioma through liquid biopsies of cerebrospinal fluid.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Diffuse gliomas are the most common malignant brain tumours in adults and include glioblastomas and World Health Organization (WHO) grade II and grade III tumours (sometimes referred to as lower-grade gliomas). Genetic tumour profiling is used to classify disease and guide therapy1,2, but involves brain surgery for tissue collection; repeated tumour biopsies may be necessary for accurate genotyping over the course of the disease3-10. While the detection of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in the blood of patients with primary brain tumours remains challenging11,12, sequencing of ctDNA from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may provide an alternative way to genotype gliomas with lower morbidity and cost13,14. We therefore evaluated the representation of the glioma genome in CSF from 85 patients with gliomas who underwent a lumbar puncture because they showed neurological signs or symptoms. Here we show that tumour-derived DNA was detected in CSF from 42 out of 85 patients (49.4%) and was associated with disease burden and adverse outcome. The genomic landscape of glioma in the CSF included a broad spectrum of genetic alterations and closely resembled the genomes of tumour biopsies. Alterations that occur early during tumorigenesis, such as co-deletion of chromosome arms 1p and 19q (1p/19q codeletion) and mutations in the metabolic genes isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) or IDH21,2, were shared in all matched ctDNA-positive CSF-tumour pairs, whereas growth factor receptor signalling pathways showed considerable evolution. The ability to monitor the evolution of the glioma genome through a minimally invasive technique could advance the clinical development and use of genotype-directed therapies for glioma, one of the most aggressive human cancers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials.

          Development of novel therapies for CNS tumors requires reliable assessment of response and progression. This requirement has been particularly challenging in neuro-oncology for which contrast enhancement serves as an imperfect surrogate for tumor volume and is influenced by agents that affect vascular permeability, such as antiangiogenic therapies. In addition, most tumors have a nonenhancing component that can be difficult to accurately quantify. To improve the response assessment in neuro-oncology and to standardize the criteria that are used for different CNS tumors, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group was established. This multidisciplinary international working group consists of neuro-oncologists, medical oncologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists, neuropsychologists, and experts in clinical outcomes assessments, working in collaboration with government and industry to enhance the interpretation of clinical trials. The RANO working group was originally created to update response criteria for high- and low-grade gliomas and to address such issues as pseudoresponse and nonenhancing tumor progression from antiangiogenic therapies, and pseudoprogression from radiochemotherapy. RANO has expanded to include working groups that are focused on other tumors, including brain metastases, leptomeningeal metastases, spine tumors, pediatric brain tumors, and meningiomas, as well as other clinical trial end points, such as clinical outcomes assessments, seizures, corticosteroid use, and positron emission tomography imaging. In an effort to standardize the measurement of neurologic function for clinical assessment, the Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology scale was drafted. Born out of a workshop conducted by the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition and the US Food and Drug Administration, a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol now exists to reduce variability and improve reliability. Efforts by RANO have been widely accepted and are increasingly being used in neuro-oncology trials, although additional refinements will be needed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Integrated genomic characterization of IDH1-mutant glioma malignant progression.

            Gliomas represent approximately 30% of all central nervous system tumors and 80% of malignant brain tumors. To understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the malignant progression of low-grade gliomas with mutations in IDH1 (encoding isocitrate dehydrogenase 1), we studied paired tumor samples from 41 patients, comparing higher-grade, progressed samples to their lower-grade counterparts. Integrated genomic analyses, including whole-exome sequencing and copy number, gene expression and DNA methylation profiling, demonstrated nonlinear clonal expansion of the original tumors and identified oncogenic pathways driving progression. These include activation of the MYC and RTK-RAS-PI3K pathways and upregulation of the FOXM1- and E2F2-mediated cell cycle transitions, as well as epigenetic silencing of developmental transcription factor genes bound by Polycomb repressive complex 2 in human embryonic stem cells. Our results not only provide mechanistic insight into the genetic and epigenetic mechanisms driving glioma progression but also identify inhibition of the bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) family as a potential therapeutic approach.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Spatiotemporal genomic architecture informs precision oncology in glioblastoma

              Raul Rabadan, Woong-Yang Park, Do-Hyun Nam and colleagues examine the genomic and transcriptomic profiles of tumors from 52 patients with glioblastoma using both bulk and single-cell analyses. They find that tumors that are isolated from distinct locations or at different times are seeded from different clones, suggesting the need for multisector biopsies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nature
                Nature
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                1476-4687
                0028-0836
                January 2019
                : 565
                : 7741
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
                [2 ] Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
                [3 ] Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
                [4 ] Medical Genetics and Human Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
                [5 ] Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
                [6 ] Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
                [7 ] Department of Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
                [8 ] Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
                [9 ] Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
                [10 ] Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
                [11 ] Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. bergerm1@mskcc.org.
                [12 ] Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. bergerm1@mskcc.org.
                [13 ] Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. bergerm1@mskcc.org.
                [14 ] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. bergerm1@mskcc.org.
                [15 ] Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. mellingi@mskcc.org.
                [16 ] Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. mellingi@mskcc.org.
                [17 ] Department of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. mellingi@mskcc.org.
                Article
                10.1038/s41586-019-0882-3 NIHMS1516901
                10.1038/s41586-019-0882-3
                6457907
                30675060
                1fb4af03-4687-493a-8892-45c8b70ec4a3
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article