7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Development of novel therapies for CNS tumors requires reliable assessment of response and progression. This requirement has been particularly challenging in neuro-oncology for which contrast enhancement serves as an imperfect surrogate for tumor volume and is influenced by agents that affect vascular permeability, such as antiangiogenic therapies. In addition, most tumors have a nonenhancing component that can be difficult to accurately quantify. To improve the response assessment in neuro-oncology and to standardize the criteria that are used for different CNS tumors, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group was established. This multidisciplinary international working group consists of neuro-oncologists, medical oncologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists, neuropsychologists, and experts in clinical outcomes assessments, working in collaboration with government and industry to enhance the interpretation of clinical trials. The RANO working group was originally created to update response criteria for high- and low-grade gliomas and to address such issues as pseudoresponse and nonenhancing tumor progression from antiangiogenic therapies, and pseudoprogression from radiochemotherapy. RANO has expanded to include working groups that are focused on other tumors, including brain metastases, leptomeningeal metastases, spine tumors, pediatric brain tumors, and meningiomas, as well as other clinical trial end points, such as clinical outcomes assessments, seizures, corticosteroid use, and positron emission tomography imaging. In an effort to standardize the measurement of neurologic function for clinical assessment, the Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology scale was drafted. Born out of a workshop conducted by the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition and the US Food and Drug Administration, a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol now exists to reduce variability and improve reliability. Efforts by RANO have been widely accepted and are increasingly being used in neuro-oncology trials, although additional refinements will be needed.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Clin Oncol
          J. Clin. Oncol
          jco
          jco
          JCO
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          American Society of Clinical Oncology
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          20 July 2017
          22 June 2017
          20 July 2018
          : 35
          : 21
          : 2439-2449
          Affiliations
          [1]Patrick Y. Wen and Eudocia Q. Lee, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Susan M. Chang, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Michael A. Vogelbaum, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Martin J. Van den Bent, Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; and David R. Macdonald, London Regional Cancer Program, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
          Author notes
          Corresponding author: Patrick Y. Wen, MD, Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215; e-mail: pwen@ 123456partners.org .
          Article
          PMC5516482 PMC5516482 5516482 727511
          10.1200/JCO.2017.72.7511
          5516482
          28640707
          361da57c-2b25-40ac-a706-368dcc01aa59
          © 2017 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
          History
          Page count
          Figures: 2, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 55, Pages: 14
          Categories
          Brain Tumors
          MRI
          Special Series Review
          Custom metadata
          v1

          Comments

          Comment on this article