14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      ROS1 Immunohistochemistry Among Major Genotypes of Non—Small-Cell Lung Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Identification of ROS1 rearrangements in patients with lung cancer allows them to benefit from targeted therapy. We compared immunohistochemistry (IHC) with more cumbersome methods such as fluorescence in situ hybridization and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for identification of ROS1 rearrangements in patients with lung adenocarcinoma (n = 33). Our results showed that IHC is a sensitive (100%) and specific (100%) method to identify ROS1 rearrangements in patients with lung cancer.

          Background

          ROS1 gene fusions cause several cancers by constitutively activating the ROS1 tyrosine kinase receptor. ROS1-targeted inhibitor therapy improves survival in the approximately 1% to 2% of patients with lung adenocarcinoma with ROS1 gene fusions. Although fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the standard diagnostic procedure for detecting ROS1 rearrangements, we studied immunohistochemistry (IHC).

          Materials and Methods

          ROS1 IHC was performed on a selected cohort of 33 lung adenocarcinoma whole tissue specimens with alterations in the EGFR (n = 5), KRAS (n = 5), ERBB2 ( HER2) (n = 3), ROS1 (n = 6), ALK (n = 5), and RET (n = 3) genes and pan-negative (n = 6) detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and FISH.

          Results

          In the cohort of 33 specimens, both ROS1 gene fusion using RT-PCR and high ROS1 protein expression using IHC were detected in 6 specimens. Of these 6 specimens, 5 were also positive by FISH for ROS1 gene rearrangements. All 27 lung cancer specimens that were negative for ROS1 rearrangements by genetic testing had no to low ROS1 protein expression.

          Conclusion

          We have optimized ROS1 IHC and scoring to provide high sensitivity and specificity for detecting ROS1 gene rearrangements in whole tissue. ROS1 IHC could be a practical and cost-effective method to screen for ROS1 gene rearrangements.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global survey of phosphotyrosine signaling identifies oncogenic kinases in lung cancer.

          Despite the success of tyrosine kinase-based cancer therapeutics, for most solid tumors the tyrosine kinases that drive disease remain unknown, limiting our ability to identify drug targets and predict response. Here we present the first large-scale survey of tyrosine kinase activity in lung cancer. Using a phosphoproteomic approach, we characterize tyrosine kinase signaling across 41 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines and over 150 NSCLC tumors. Profiles of phosphotyrosine signaling are generated and analyzed to identify known oncogenic kinases such as EGFR and c-Met as well as novel ALK and ROS fusion proteins. Other activated tyrosine kinases such as PDGFRalpha and DDR1 not previously implicated in the genesis of NSCLC are also identified. By focusing on activated cell circuitry, the approach outlined here provides insight into cancer biology not available at the chromosomal and transcriptional levels and can be applied broadly across all human cancers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            ROS1 rearrangements define a unique molecular class of lung cancers.

            Chromosomal rearrangements involving the ROS1 receptor tyrosine kinase gene have recently been described in a subset of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Because little is known about these tumors, we examined the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with NSCLC with ROS1 rearrangement. Using a ROS1 fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) assay, we screened 1,073 patients with NSCLC and correlated ROS1 rearrangement status with clinical characteristics, overall survival, and when available, ALK rearrangement status. In vitro studies assessed the responsiveness of cells with ROS1 rearrangement to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib. The clinical response of one patient with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC to crizotinib was investigated as part of an expanded phase I cohort. Of 1,073 tumors screened, 18 (1.7%) were ROS1 rearranged by FISH, and 31 (2.9%) were ALK rearranged. Compared with the ROS1-negative group, patients with ROS1 rearrangements were significantly younger and more likely to be never-smokers (each P < .001). All of the ROS1-positive tumors were adenocarcinomas, with a tendency toward higher grade. ROS1-positive and -negative groups showed no difference in overall survival. The HCC78 ROS1-rearranged NSCLC cell line and 293 cells transfected with CD74-ROS1 showed evidence of sensitivity to crizotinib. The patient treated with crizotinib showed tumor shrinkage, with a near complete response. ROS1 rearrangement defines a molecular subset of NSCLC with distinct clinical characteristics that are similar to those observed in patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC. Crizotinib shows in vitro activity and early evidence of clinical activity in ROS1-rearranged NSCLC.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              RET, ROS1 and ALK fusions in lung cancer.

              Through an integrated molecular- and histopathology-based screening system, we performed a screening for fusions of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and c-ros oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1) in 1,529 lung cancers and identified 44 ALK-fusion-positive and 13 ROS1-fusion-positive adenocarcinomas, including for unidentified fusion partners for ROS1. In addition, we discovered previously unidentified kinase fusions that may be promising for molecular-targeted therapy, kinesin family member 5B (KIF5B)-ret proto-oncogene (RET) and coiled-coil domain containing 6 (CCDC6)-RET, in 14 adenocarcinomas. A multivariate analysis of 1,116 adenocarcinomas containing these 71 kinase-fusion-positive adenocarcinomas identified four independent factors that are indicators of poor prognosis: age ≥ 50 years, male sex, high pathological stage and negative kinase-fusion status.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                100893225
                31713
                Clin Lung Cancer
                Clin Lung Cancer
                Clinical lung cancer
                1525-7304
                1938-0690
                12 February 2016
                24 October 2014
                March 2015
                29 February 2016
                : 16
                : 2
                : 106-111
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medical Oncology and Pathology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
                [2 ]Division of Integrated Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe, Japan
                [3 ]Department of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Fred R. Hirsch, MD, PhD, Department of Medical Oncology and Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver—Anschutz Medical Campus, Mail Stop 8117, 12801 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, Fred.Hirsch@ 123456ucdenver.edu
                Article
                NIHMS758611
                10.1016/j.cllc.2014.10.003
                4770803
                25467930
                f2009f0f-e076-4b01-80c3-5fddbee63698

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-SA license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                adenocarcinoma,biomarker,gene rearrangement,nsclc,ros1
                adenocarcinoma, biomarker, gene rearrangement, nsclc, ros1

                Comments

                Comment on this article