16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of Different Intubation Methods in Difficult Airways during Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Continuous Chest Compression: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Trial

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction. Airway management is one of key elements of resuscitation. Endotracheal intubation is still considered the gold standard for airway management during resuscitation. Aim. The aim of the study was to compare success rates and intubation time of different endotracheal intubation methods during emergency intubation with difficult airways in the conditions of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a standardized manikin model. Methods. The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, cross-over simulation study. It involved 46 paramedics with at least 5 years of experience in Emergency Medical Service. The participants performed endotracheal intubation under difficult airway conditions during continuous chest compression, implemented with the LUCAS3 chest compression system. Three methods of tracheal intubation were applied: (1) standard Macintosh laryngoscope without a bougie stylet; (2) standard laryngoscope and a standard bougie stylet; (3) standard laryngoscope and a new bougie stylet. Results. The overall intubation success rate was 100% in the standard bougie and new bougie groups and lower (86.9%) when no bougie stylet was used (P=0.028). The intubation success rate with the 1 s t attempt equalled 91.3% for the new bougie group, 73.9% for standard bougie, and only 23.9% in the no-bougie group. The median intubation time was shortest in the new bougie group, where it amounted to 29 s (interquartile range [IQR]: 25–38); the time equalled 38s (IQR:31–44.5) in the standard bougie group and 47.5s (IQR:36–58) in the no-bougie group. The ease of use was lowest in the no-bougie group (85, IQR:63–88), average in the standard bougie group (44, IQR:30–51), and highest in the new bougie stylet group (32, IQR:19–41). Conclusion. In this manikin-based study, paramedics were able to perform endotracheal intubation with higher efficacy and in a shorter time using the new bougie stylet as compared with the standard bougie stylet.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 3. Adult advanced life support.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Defining the learning curve for endotracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy: A systematic review.

            More than two failed intubation attempts and failed endotracheal intubations (ETIs) are associated with severe complications and death. The aim of this review was to determine the number of ETIs a health care provider in training needs to perform to achieve proficiency within two attempts. A systematic search of the literature was conducted covering the time frame of January 1990 through July 2014. We identified 13 studies with a total of 1462 students who had attempted to intubate 19,108 patients. This review shows that in mostly elective circumstances, at least 50 ETIs with no more than two intubation attempts need to be performed to reach a success rate of at least 90%. However, the evidence is heterogeneous, and the incidence of difficult airways in non-elective settings is up to 20 times higher compared to elective settings. Taking this factor into account, training should include a variety of exposures and should probably exceed 50 ETIs to successfully serve the most vulnerable patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Comparison of laryngeal mask airway vs tracheal intubation: a systematic review on airway complications

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Emergency Medicine International
                Emergency Medicine International
                Hindawi Limited
                2090-2840
                2090-2859
                August 20 2019
                August 20 2019
                : 2019
                : 1-7
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Ufuk University Medical Faculty, Dr Ridvan Ege Education and Research Hospital, 06520 Cankaya, Ankara, Turkey
                [2 ]Department of Emergency Medical Service, Wroclaw Medical University, Parkowa 34, Wroclaw, Poland
                [3 ]Medical Simulation Center, Lazarski University, Swieradowska 43, 02-662 Warsaw, Poland
                [4 ]Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Silesia, 3-go Maja 13-15, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
                [5 ]Department of Emergency Medicine and Disaster, Medical University Bialystok, Szpitalna 37, 15-295 Bialystok, Poland
                Article
                10.1155/2019/7306204
                31ff1ba4-9cd9-49ea-b2f0-6919c1441a3f
                © 2019

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article