6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Radiological Outcomes of Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Dental Implants: Systematic Review

      review-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background : to assess the radiological marginal bone loss between bone-level or tissue-level dental implants through a systematic review of literature until September 2019. Methods : MEDLINE, Embase and other database were searched by two independent authors including only English articles. Results : The search provided 1028 records and, after removing the duplicates through titles and abstracts screening, 45 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. For qualitative analysis 20 articles were included, 17 articles of them for quantitative analysis counting a total of 1161 patients (mean age 54.4 years) and 2933 implants, 1427 inserted at Tissue-level (TL) and 1506 inserted at Bone-level (BL). The survival rate and the success rate were more than 90%, except for 2 studies with a success rate of 88% and 86.2%. No studies reported any differences between groups in term of success and survival rates. Three studies showed that BL-implants had statistically less marginal bone loss ( p < 0.05). Only one study reported statistically less marginal bone loss in TL-implants ( p < 0.05). Conclusion : In the most part of the studies, differences between implant types in marginal bone loss were not statistically significant after a variable period of follow-up ranged between 1 and 5 years.

          Related collections

          Most cited references82

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

          Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              10-year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients.

              This retrospective study assessed the 10-year outcomes of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface in a large cohort of partially edentulous patients. Records of patients treated with SLA implants between May 1997 and January 2001 were screened. Eligible patients were contacted and invited to undergo a clinical and radiologic examination. Each implant was classified according to strict success criteria. Three hundred three patients with 511 SLA implants were available for the examination. The mean age of the patients at implant surgery was 48 years. Over the 10-year period, no implant fracture was noted, whereas six implants (1.2%) were lost. Two implants (0.4%) showed signs of suppuration at the 10-year examination, whereas seven implants had a history of peri-implantitis (1.4%) during the 10-year period, but presented with healthy peri-implant soft tissues at examination. The remaining 496 implants fulfilled the success criteria. The mean Plaque Index was 0.65 (±0.64), the mean Sulcus Bleeding Index 1.32 (±0.57), the mean Probing Depth 3.27 mm (±1.06), and the mean distance from the implant shoulder to the mucosal margin value -0.42 mm (±1.27). The radiologic mean distance from the implant shoulder to the first bone-to-implant contact was 3.32 mm (±0.73). The present retrospective analysis resulted in a 10-year implant survival rate of 98.8% and a success rate of 97.0%. In addition, the prevalence of peri-implantitis in this large cohort of orally healthy patients was low with 1.8% during the 10-year period.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                22 September 2020
                September 2020
                : 17
                : 18
                : 6920
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Oral Surgery Unit, Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 13, 46010 Valencia, Spain; miguel.penarrocha@ 123456uv.es (M.P.-D.); david.penarrocha@ 123456uv.es (D.P.-O.)
                [2 ]Tuscan Stomatologic Institute, via Aurelia, 335, 55041 Lido di Camaiore, Italy; simosurg@ 123456gmail.com (S.M.); michela.boccuzzi@ 123456hotmail.it (M.B.); gbmenchinifabris@ 123456yahoo.it (G.B.M.F.); covani@ 123456covani.it (U.C.)
                [3 ]Department of Stomatology, University of Studies Guglielmo Marconi, 44, 00193 Roma, Italy
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: s.cosola@ 123456hotmail.it
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9107-8011
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9542-0160
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8407-7982
                Article
                ijerph-17-06920
                10.3390/ijerph17186920
                7557536
                32971869
                053a2b3d-da86-440c-9218-cfcaf82829b8
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 09 July 2020
                : 09 September 2020
                Categories
                Review

                Public health
                tissue-level,bone-level,dental implants,transmucosal,marginal bone loss,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article