11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Development of Polarizable Gaussian Model for Molecular Mechanical Calculations I: Atomic Polarizability Parameterization to Reproduce Ab Initio Anisotropy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A set of atomic polarizability parameters for a new polarizable Gaussian model (pGM) has been developed with the goal to accurately reproduce the polarizability anisotropy, taking advantage of its ability to attenuate all short-range electrostatic interactions, by fitting the ab initio molecular polarizability tensors ( A pq ) calculated at the B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ level. For comparison, we also rederived the parameters for three Thole models in which the 1–2 (bonded), 1–3 (separated by two bonds) and 1–4 (separated by three bonds) interactions are fully included.

          The average percent errors (APEs) of molecular polarizability tensors for 4842 molecules or dimers are 2.98, 3.76, 3.28, and 3.82% for the pGM, Thole linear, Thole exponential, and Thole Amoeba models, respectively, with atom-type independent, universal screening factors (USF). The APEs are reduced further to 2.30, 2.69, 2.25, and 2.48% for the four corresponding polarizable models with atom-type dependent, variable screening factors (VSF). It is encouraging that the pGM with variable screening factors achieved APEs of 1.83 for 1155 amino acid analogs, dipeptides and tetrapeptides, 1.39 for 28 nucleic acid bases, 0.708 for 1464 water clusters, and 1.99 for 85 dimers of water and biological building blocks. Compared to the new set of models, the APEs of the old Thole models that were fitted to isotropic molecular polarizabilities are 8.7% for the Set A (without the 1–2 and 1–3 interactions) and 6.3% for the Set D (with the 1–2 and 1–3 interactions) models, respectively. MPAD, a metric of molecular polarization anisotropy difference based on the diagonal terms of molecular polarizability tensors was defined and applied to assess the polarizable models in reproducing the ab initio molecular polarization anisotropy. The MPADs are 3.71, 4.70, 4.11, and 4.77% for the pGM, Thole linear, Thole exponential, and Thole Amoeba USF models, respectively. The APEs are reduced further to 2.85, 3.58, 2.90, and 3.15% for the four corresponding VSF models. Thus, the new pGM and Thole models notably improve molecular polarization anisotropy. Since pGM attenuates all short-range electrostatic interactions, its application is expected to improve stability in charge fitting, energy and force calculations and the accuracy of multibody polarization.

          Graphical Abstract

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          101232704
          33038
          J Chem Theory Comput
          J Chem Theory Comput
          Journal of chemical theory and computation
          1549-9618
          1549-9626
          6 April 2020
          04 February 2019
          12 February 2019
          04 May 2020
          : 15
          : 2
          : 1146-1158
          Affiliations
          []Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Terrace St Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States
          []SBP Medical Discovery Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, United States
          []Departments of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States
          [§ ]UC Davis Genome Center and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, United States
          Author notes
          Corresponding authors: Junmei Wang, 412-383-3268, junmei.wang@ 123456pitt.edu , Yong Duan, 530-754-7632, duan@ 123456ucdavis.edu
          Article
          PMC7197406 PMC7197406 7197406 nihpa1582036
          10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00603
          7197406
          30645118
          42635581-f035-4519-9a06-d2fa198e7191
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article