17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      El Dimorfismo Sexual en Distintas Relaciones Cráneo-Mandibulares Translated title: Sexual Dimorphism in Different Craneomandibular Relationships

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          La estimación del sexo en base a restos esqueletales es uno de los principales objetivos de las ciencias forenses. Esta estimación se basa en las diferencias de forma y tamaño que existen entre mujeres y hombres (dimorfismo sexual). En este trabajo se analiza la asociación entre el dimorfismo sexual de la mandíbula y las distintas relaciones cráneo-mandibulares (ortognata, prognata y retrognata). Se analizaron 4 medidas faciales (altura facial, altura de la rama de la mandíbula, ancho mínimo de la rama mandibular, largo del cuerpo de la mandíbula) en tele-radiografías de 114 pacientes chilenos de sexo y relación cráneo-mandibular conocidos para evaluar si, al igual que en poblaciones de otras partes del mundo, estas son sexualmente dimórficas. Los resultados indican que con la excepción del largo del cuerpo de la mandíbula, las demás variables permiten una elevada clasificación correcta del sexo de los individuos (88,6 % de los casos). Se concluye que una relación cráneo-mandibular retrognata o prognata, no afecta la estimación confiable del sexo de los individuos de población chilena.

          Translated abstract

          Sex assessment using bone remains is one of the main goals of forensic sciences. This assessment is possible because of the morphological and size differences between women and men (sexual dimorphism). In this work we study the association between sexual dimorphism and the different positions of the mandible and skull (prognathism, retrognathism and orgotnatism). We analyze 4 facial measurements in 114 teleradiographies of Chilean patients with known sex and positional relationship of the mandible and cranium, to evaluate if, as in populations of other parts of the world, these are sexually dimorphic. The results indicate that, with the exception of mandible width, the rest of the variables allows a high correct classification of individuals by sex (88.6 % of the cases). We conclude that the relation between different positions of the mandible and skull does not affect a reliable sex assessment in Chilean population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Mandibular ramus flexure: A new morphologic indicator of sexual dimorphism in the human skeleton

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Forensic anthropology of sex and body size

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sexual dimorphism in human cranial trait scores: effects of population, age, and body size.

              Sex estimation from the skull is commonly performed by physical and forensic anthropologists using a five-trait scoring system developed by Walker. Despite the popularity of this method, validation studies evaluating its accuracy across a variety of samples are lacking. Furthermore, it remains unclear what other intrinsic or extrinsic variables are related to the expression of these traits. In this study, cranial trait scores and postcranial measurements were collected from four diverse population groups (U.S. Whites, U.S. Blacks, medieval Nubians, and Arikara Native Americans) following Walker's protocols (total n = 499). Univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to evaluate the accuracy of these traits in sex estimation, and to test for the effects of population, age, and body size on trait expressions. Results revealed significant effects of population on all trait scores. Sample-specific correct sex classification rates ranged from 74% to 94%, with an overall accuracy of 85% for the pooled sample. Classification performance varied among the traits (best for glabella and mastoid scores and worst for nuchal scores). Furthermore, correlations between traits were weak or nonsignificant, suggesting that different factors may influence individual traits. Some traits displayed correlations with age and/or postcranial size that were significant but weak, and within-population analyses did not reveal any consistent relationships between these traits across all groups. These results indicate that neither age nor body size plays a large role in trait expression, and thus does not need to be incorporated into sex estimation methods.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                ijmorphol
                International Journal of Morphology
                Int. J. Morphol.
                Sociedad Chilena de Anatomía
                0717-9502
                March 2016
                : 34
                : 1
                : 365-370
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Universitat Rovira i Virgili España
                [2 ] Universidad de La Frontera Chile
                Article
                S0717-95022016000100052
                3c906433-ec83-45fa-852a-da81fb654733

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                Product

                SciELO Chile

                Self URI (journal page): http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0717-9502&lng=en
                Categories
                ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY

                Anatomy & Physiology
                Prognatismo,Retrognatismo,Dimorfismo sexual,Cefalometría,Prognathism,Retrognathism,Sexual dimorphism,Cephalometrics

                Comments

                Comment on this article