46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Lung Cancer with a High Tumor Mutational Burden

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed promising efficacy for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a phase 1 trial, and tumor mutational burden has emerged as a potential biomarker of benefit. In this part of an open-label, multipart, phase 3 trial, we examined progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy among patients with a high tumor mutational burden (≥10 mutations per megabase).

          Methods

          We enrolled patients with stage IV or recurrent NSCLC that was not previously treated with chemotherapy. Those with a level of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of at least 1% were randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab monotherapy, or chemotherapy; those with a tumor PD-L1 expression level of less than 1% were randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy. Tumor mutational burden was determined by the FoundationOne CDx assay.

          Results

          Progression-free survival among patients with a high tumor mutational burden was significantly longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy. The 1-year progression-free survival rate was 42.6% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 13.2% with chemotherapy, and the median progression-free survival was 7.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5 to 13.2) versus 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.4 to 5.8) (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.58; 97.5% CI, 0.41 to 0.81; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 45.3% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 26.9% with chemotherapy. The benefit of nivolumab plus ipilimumab over chemotherapy was broadly consistent within subgroups, including patients with a PD-L1 expression level of at least 1% and those with a level of less than 1%. The rate of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 31.2% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 36.1% with chemotherapy.

          Conclusions

          Progression-free survival was significantly longer with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy among patients with NSCLC and a high tumor mutational burden, irrespective of PD-L1 expression level. The results validate the benefit of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in NSCLC and the role of tumor mutational burden as a biomarker for patient selection. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 227 Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT02477826.)

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Systemic Therapy for Stage IV Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update Summary

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: emerging sequencing for new treatment targets

            Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) stimulate cytotoxic lymphocyte activity against tumour cells. These agents are available for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of platinum-based therapy. One recent study has demonstrated that ICI monotherapy was superior to platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment. Nevertheless, this benefit was only for a minority of the population (30%) whose tumour programmed death receptor ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression was above 50%. Therefore, several strategies are under investigation. One option for patients with PD-L1 expression lower than 50% may be the combination of ICI with platinum-based chemotherapy or with ICIs against different targets. However, all of these combinations are at an early stage of investigation and may be very expensive or toxic, producing several harmful adverse events.
              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Contributors
              Journal
              0255562
              5985
              N Engl J Med
              N. Engl. J. Med.
              The New England journal of medicine
              0028-4793
              1533-4406
              5 April 2020
              16 April 2018
              31 May 2018
              01 May 2020
              : 378
              : 22
              : 2093-2104
              Affiliations
              Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Hospital, New York
              Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta Institute of Oncology and Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
              Centrum Onkologii-Instytut im. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie, Warsaw, Poland
              Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
              Ohio State University, Columbus
              Hôpital Sainte Musse, Toulon, France
              Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy
              First Department of Oncology, Metropolitan Hospital, Athens, Greece
              Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis, Amsterdam
              Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile
              Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia
              Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta
              Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore
              LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany
              Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
              Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
              Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
              Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
              Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
              Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
              Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
              Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
              Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
              Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas, Universidad Complutense, and CiberOnc, Madrid
              Author notes
              Address reprint requests to Dr. Hellmann at the Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 885 2nd Ave., New York, NY 10017, or at hellmanm@ 123456mskcc.org ; or to Dr. Paz-Ares at the Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Av. de Córdoba SN, 280141 Madrid, Spain, or at lpazaresr@ 123456seom.org .
              Article
              PMC7193684 PMC7193684 7193684 nihpa1581592
              10.1056/NEJMoa1801946
              7193684
              29658845
              2ba4a776-49d3-47b9-b329-faa984f1b273
              History
              Categories
              Article

              Comments

              Comment on this article