86
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The associations of parity and maternal age with small-for-gestational-age, preterm, and neonatal and infant mortality: a meta-analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Previous studies have reported on adverse neonatal outcomes associated with parity and maternal age. Many of these studies have relied on cross-sectional data, from which drawing causal inference is complex. We explore the associations between parity/maternal age and adverse neonatal outcomes using data from cohort studies conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).

          Methods

          Data from 14 cohort studies were included. Parity (nulliparous, parity 1-2, parity ≥3) and maternal age (<18 years, 18-<35 years, ≥35 years) categories were matched with each other to create exposure categories, with those who are parity 1-2 and age 18-<35 years as the reference. Outcomes included small-for-gestational-age (SGA), preterm, neonatal and infant mortality. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were calculated per study and meta-analyzed.

          Results

          Nulliparous, age <18 year women, compared with women who were parity 1-2 and age 18-<35 years had the highest odds of SGA (pooled adjusted OR: 1.80), preterm (pooled aOR: 1.52), neonatal mortality (pooled aOR: 2.07), and infant mortality (pooled aOR: 1.49). Increased odds were also noted for SGA and neonatal mortality for nulliparous/age 18-<35 years, preterm, neonatal, and infant mortality for parity ≥3/age 18-<35 years, and preterm and neonatal mortality for parity ≥3/≥35 years.

          Conclusions

          Nulliparous women <18 years of age have the highest odds of adverse neonatal outcomes. Family planning has traditionally been the least successful in addressing young age as a risk factor; a renewed focus must be placed on finding effective interventions that delay age at first birth. Higher odds of adverse outcomes are also seen among parity ≥3 / age ≥35 mothers, suggesting that reproductive health interventions need to address the entirety of a woman’s reproductive period.

          Funding

          Funding was provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (810-2054) by a grant to the US Fund for UNICEF to support the activities of the Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Teenage pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: a large population based retrospective cohort study.

          Whether the association between teenage pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes could be explained by deleterious social environment, inadequate prenatal care, or biological immaturity remains controversial. The objective of this study was to determine whether teenage pregnancy is associated with increased adverse birth outcomes independent of known confounding factors. We carried out a retrospective cohort study of 3,886,364 nulliparous pregnant women <25 years of age with a live singleton birth during 1995 and 2000 in the United States. All teenage groups were associated with increased risks for pre-term delivery, low birth weight and neonatal mortality. Infants born to teenage mothers aged 17 or younger had a higher risk for low Apgar score at 5 min. Further adjustment for weight gain during pregnancy did not change the observed association. Restricting the analysis to white married mothers with age-appropriate education level, adequate prenatal care, without smoking and alcohol use during pregnancy yielded similar results. Teenage pregnancy increases the risk of adverse birth outcomes that is independent of important known confounders. This finding challenges the accepted opinion that adverse birth outcome associated with teenage pregnancy is attributable to low socioeconomic status, inadequate prenatal care and inadequate weight gain during pregnancy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impact of maternal age on obstetric outcome.

            To estimate the effect of maternal age on obstetric outcomes. A prospective database from a multicenter investigation of singletons, the FASTER trial, was studied. Subjects were divided into 3 age groups: 1) less than 35 years, 2) 35-39 years, and 3) 40 years and older. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effect of age on outcomes after adjusting for race, parity, body mass index, education, marital status, smoking, medical history, use of assisted conception, and patient's study site. A total of 36,056 women with complete data were available: 28,398 (79%) less than 35 years of age; 6,294 (17%) 35-39 years; and 1,364 (4%) 40 years and older. Increasing age was significantly associated with miscarriage (adjusted odds ratio [adjOR]2.0 and 2.4 for ages 35-39 years and age 40 years and older, respectively), chromosomal abnormalities (adjOR 4.0 and 9.9), congenital anomalies (adjOR 1.4 and 1.7), gestational diabetes (adjOR 1.8 and 2.4), placenta previa (adjOR 1.8 and 2.8), and cesarean delivery (adjOR 1.6 and 2.0). Patients aged 35-39 years were at increased risk for macrosomia (adjOR 1.4). Increased risk for abruption (adjOR 2.3), preterm delivery (adjOR 1.4), low birth weight (adjOR 1.6), and perinatal mortality (adjOR 2.2) was noted in women aged 40 years and older. Increasing maternal age is independently associated with specific adverse pregnancy outcomes. Increasing age is a continuum rather than a threshold effect.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Maternal-perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with adolescent pregnancy in Latin America: Cross-sectional study.

              This study was undertaken to determine whether adolescent pregnancy is associated with increased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. We studied 854,377 Latin American women who were younger than 25 years during 1985 through 2003 using information recorded in the Perinatal Information System database of the Latin American Center for Perinatology and Human Development, Montevideo, Uruguay. Adjusted odds ratios were obtained through logistic regression analysis. After an adjustment for 16 major confounding factors, adolescents aged 15 years or younger had higher risks for maternal death, early neonatal death, and anemia compared with women aged 20 to 24 years. Moreover, all age groups of adolescents had higher risks for postpartum hemorrhage, puerperal endometritis, operative vaginal delivery, episiotomy, low birth weight, preterm delivery, and small-for-gestational-age infants. All adolescent mothers had lower risks for cesarean delivery, third-trimester bleeding, and gestational diabetes. In Latin America, adolescent pregnancy is independently associated with increased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central
                1471-2458
                2013
                17 September 2013
                : 13
                : Suppl 3
                : S2
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
                [2 ]Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
                [3 ]Programa de Pós-graduacao em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Rua Marechal Deodoro 1160, 3o piso, Centro, CEP 96020-220, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
                [4 ]Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
                [5 ]School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway Crawley WA 6009, Perth, Australia
                [6 ]UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/Word Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
                [7 ]University of North Carolina School of Public Health, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
                [8 ]Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde e Comportamento, Univertsidade Católica de Pelotas, Félix da Cunha, 412, CEP 96010-000, Centro, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
                [9 ]Departments of Nutrition, Epidemiology, and Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
                [10 ]Zvitambo, No 1 Borrowdale Road, Borrowdale, Harare, Zimbabwe
                [11 ]Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B – 9000, Ghent, Belgium
                [12 ]Woman and Child Health Research Center, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium
                [13 ]ASEAN Institute for Health Development, Mahidol University, 999 Phuttamonthon 4 Rd, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand
                [14 ]Institute for Global Health, UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK
                Author notes
                Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group (CHERG) Small-for-Gestational-Age-Preterm Birth Working Group
                Article
                1471-2458-13-S3-S2
                10.1186/1471-2458-13-S3-S2
                3847520
                23280303
                fe3d3e68-22aa-4e9f-9532-4ea6ddec2e2b
                Copyright © 2013 Kozuki et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Review

                Public health
                Public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article