1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Evaluating SEM Model Fit with Small Degrees of Freedom

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d3517364e99">Research has revealed that the performance of root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) in assessing structural equation models with small degrees of freedom (df) is suboptimal, often resulting in the rejection of correctly specified or closely fitted models. This study investigates the performance of standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) and comparative fit index (CFI) in small df models with various levels of factor loadings, sample sizes, and model misspecifications. We find that, in comparison with RMSEA, population SRMR and CFI are less susceptible to the effects of df. In small df models, the sample SRMR and CFI could provide more useful information to differentiate models with various levels of misfit. The confidence intervals and p-values of a close fit were generally accurate for all three fit indices. We recommend researchers use caution when interpreting RMSEA for models with small df and to rely more on SRMR and CFI. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            lavaan: AnRPackage for Structural Equation Modeling

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

              P. Bentler (1990)
              Normed and nonnormed fit indexes are frequently used as adjuncts to chi-square statistics for evaluating the fit of a structural model. A drawback of existing indexes is that they estimate no known population parameters. A new coefficient is proposed to summarize the relative reduction in the noncentrality parameters of two nested models. Two estimators of the coefficient yield new normed (CFI) and nonnormed (FI) fit indexes. CFI avoids the underestimation of fit often noted in small samples for Bentler and Bonett's (1980) normed fit index (NFI). FI is a linear function of Bentler and Bonett's non-normed fit index (NNFI) that avoids the extreme underestimation and overestimation often found in NNFI. Asymptotically, CFI, FI, NFI, and a new index developed by Bollen are equivalent measures of comparative fit, whereas NNFI measures relative fit by comparing noncentrality per degree of freedom. All of the indexes are generalized to permit use of Wald and Lagrange multiplier statistics. An example illustrates the behavior of these indexes under conditions of correct specification and misspecification. The new fit indexes perform very well at all sample sizes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Multivariate Behavioral Research
                Multivariate Behavioral Research
                Informa UK Limited
                0027-3171
                1532-7906
                May 04 2022
                February 12 2021
                May 04 2022
                : 57
                : 2-3
                : 179-207
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina
                [2 ]Department of Educational Studies, University of South Carolina
                [3 ]Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona
                [4 ]Department of Psychology, Chung-Ang University;
                Article
                10.1080/00273171.2020.1868965
                33576257
                fdc2b0bd-f7ee-4f99-bc55-446148e5e7bc
                © 2022
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article