32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Evolution in Anxiety and Depression with the Progression of the Pandemic in Adult Populations from Eight Countries and Four Continents

      research-article
      1 , * , 2 , 1 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 6 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 11 , 12 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 3 , 18
      ,
      International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
      MDPI
      pandemic, psychosocial impacts, sense of coherence

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Nearly a year after the classification of the COVID-19 outbreak as a global pandemic, it is clear that different factors have contributed to an increase in psychological disorders, including public health measures that infringe on personal freedoms, growing financial losses, and conflicting messages. This study examined the evolution of psychosocial impacts with the progression of the pandemic in adult populations from different countries and continents, and identified, among a wide range of individual and country-level factors, which ones are contributing to this evolving psychological response. An online survey was conducted in May/June 2020 and in November 2020, among a sample of 17,833 adults (Phase 1: 8806; Phase 2: 9027) from eight countries/regions (Canada, the United States, England, Switzerland, Belgium, Hong Kong, the Philippines, New Zealand). Probable generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depressive episode (MDE) were assessed. The independent role of potential factors was examined using multilevel logistic regression. Probable GAD or MDE was indicated by 30.1% and 32.5% of the respondents during phases 1 and 2, respectively (a 7.9% increase over time), with an important variation according to countries/regions (range from 22.3% in Switzerland to 38.8% in the Philippines). This proportion exceeded 50% among young adults (18–24 years old) in all countries except for Switzerland. Beyond young age, several factors negatively influenced mental health in times of pandemic; important factors were found, including weak sense of coherence (adjusted odds ratio aOR = 3.89), false beliefs (aOR = 2.33), and self-isolation/quarantine (aOR = 2.01). The world has entered a new era dominated by psychological suffering and rising demand for mental health interventions, along a continuum from health promotion to specialized healthcare. More than ever, we need to innovate and build interventions aimed at strengthening key protective factors, such as sense of coherence, in the fight against the adversity caused by the concurrent pandemic and infodemic.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence

          Summary The December, 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak has seen many countries ask people who have potentially come into contact with the infection to isolate themselves at home or in a dedicated quarantine facility. Decisions on how to apply quarantine should be based on the best available evidence. We did a Review of the psychological impact of quarantine using three electronic databases. Of 3166 papers found, 24 are included in this Review. Most reviewed studies reported negative psychological effects including post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger. Stressors included longer quarantine duration, infection fears, frustration, boredom, inadequate supplies, inadequate information, financial loss, and stigma. Some researchers have suggested long-lasting effects. In situations where quarantine is deemed necessary, officials should quarantine individuals for no longer than required, provide clear rationale for quarantine and information about protocols, and ensure sufficient supplies are provided. Appeals to altruism by reminding the public about the benefits of quarantine to wider society can be favourable.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Estimating the Dimension of a Model

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science

              Summary The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is having a profound effect on all aspects of society, including mental health and physical health. We explore the psychological, social, and neuroscientific effects of COVID-19 and set out the immediate priorities and longer-term strategies for mental health science research. These priorities were informed by surveys of the public and an expert panel convened by the UK Academy of Medical Sciences and the mental health research charity, MQ: Transforming Mental Health, in the first weeks of the pandemic in the UK in March, 2020. We urge UK research funding agencies to work with researchers, people with lived experience, and others to establish a high level coordination group to ensure that these research priorities are addressed, and to allow new ones to be identified over time. The need to maintain high-quality research standards is imperative. International collaboration and a global perspective will be beneficial. An immediate priority is collecting high-quality data on the mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic across the whole population and vulnerable groups, and on brain function, cognition, and mental health of patients with COVID-19. There is an urgent need for research to address how mental health consequences for vulnerable groups can be mitigated under pandemic conditions, and on the impact of repeated media consumption and health messaging around COVID-19. Discovery, evaluation, and refinement of mechanistically driven interventions to address the psychological, social, and neuroscientific aspects of the pandemic are required. Rising to this challenge will require integration across disciplines and sectors, and should be done together with people with lived experience. New funding will be required to meet these priorities, and it can be efficiently leveraged by the UK's world-leading infrastructure. This Position Paper provides a strategy that may be both adapted for, and integrated with, research efforts in other countries.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                01 May 2021
                May 2021
                : 18
                : 9
                : 4845
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 5N4, Canada; elsa.landaverde@ 123456umontreal.ca
                [2 ]School of Health Sciences, University of Canterbury-Te Whare Wananga o Waitaha, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand; philip.schluter@ 123456canterbury.ac.nz
                [3 ]Collaborating Centre for Oxford University and CUHK for Disaster and Medical Humanitarian Response, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Ngan Shing Street 30-32, Hong Kong, China; kevin.hung@ 123456cuhk.edu.hk (K.K.H.); cswong@ 123456cuhk.edu.hk (C.S.W.); catherine.mok@ 123456cuhk.edu.hk (C.P.Y.M.); emily.chan@ 123456cuhk.edu.hk (E.Y.Y.C.)
                [4 ]School of Applied Politics, Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada; gabriel.blouin-genest@ 123456usherbrooke.ca
                [5 ]Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 7K4, Canada; tosulliv@ 123456uottawa.ca
                [6 ]Department of Communication, Faculté de Lettres et Sciences Humaines, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada; marc.d.david@ 123456usherbrooke.ca (M.D.D.); marie-eve.carignan@ 123456usherbrooke.ca (M.-E.C.); olivier.champagne-poirier@ 123456usherbrooke.ca (O.C.-P.)
                [7 ]Académie du Journalisme et des Médias, Université de Neuchâtel, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland; nathalie.pignard-cheynel@ 123456unine.ch
                [8 ]Medi@Lab, Université de Genève, Boulevard du Pont-d’Arve 40, 1205 Genève, Switzerland; Sebastien.Salerno@ 123456unige.ch
                [9 ]Institut Langage et Communication, Université catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; gregoire.lits@ 123456uclouvain.be
                [10 ]Institute for Media Studies, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; leen.dhaenens@ 123456kuleuven.be
                [11 ]Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; david.deconinck@ 123456kuleuven.be (D.D.C.); koen.matthijs@ 123456kuleuven.be (K.M.)
                [12 ]School of Political Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada; echampagne@ 123456uottawa.ca (E.C.); nburlone@ 123456uottawa.ca (N.B.)
                [13 ]National Collaborating Centre for Infectious Diseases, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0T5, Canada; sheikh.qadar@ 123456umanitoba.ca
                [14 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Philippines, Manille Grand, Manila 1000, Philippines; ted.herbosa@ 123456gmail.com
                [15 ]Centro Universitário de Brasília, Brasilia 70850-090, Brazil; gleisse@ 123456yahoo.com
                [16 ]Department of Health, Manila, Manila 2932, Philippines; ronlawmd@ 123456gmail.com
                [17 ]Public Health England, London SE1 8UG, UK; virginia.murray@ 123456phe.gov.uk
                [18 ]Department of Family Medicine & Emergency Medicine, Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 5N4, Canada; Mathieu.roy7@ 123456usherbrooke.ca
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6269-8801
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6799-6779
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8706-7758
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5457-9391
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4631-7727
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9307-8880
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7847-9996
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3831-266X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3117-468X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8854-5093
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6405-6765
                Article
                ijerph-18-04845
                10.3390/ijerph18094845
                8125359
                34062769
                fa531faf-a54f-4dca-8cf8-327b04b0d596
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 26 March 2021
                : 29 April 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                pandemic,psychosocial impacts,sense of coherence
                Public health
                pandemic, psychosocial impacts, sense of coherence

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                48
                8
                68
                1
                Smart Citations
                48
                8
                68
                1
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content75

                Cited by22

                Most referenced authors3,289