37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The neurobiology of treatment-resistant schizophrenia: paths to antipsychotic resistance and a roadmap for future research

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), the persistence of positive symptoms despite ≥2 trials of adequate dose and duration of antipsychotic medication with documented adherence, is a serious clinical problem with heterogeneous presentations. TRS can vary in its onset (at the first episode of psychosis or upon relapse), in its severity, and in the response to subsequent therapeutic interventions (i.e., clozapine, electroconvulsive therapy). The heterogeneity of TRS indicates that the underlying neurobiology of TRS may differ not only from treatment-responsive schizophrenia but also among patients with TRS. Several hypotheses have been proposed for the neurobiological mechanisms underlying TRS, including dopamine supersensitivity, hyperdopaminergic and normodopaminergic subtypes, glutamate dysregulation, inflammation and oxidative stress, and serotonin dysregulation. Research supporting these hypotheses is limited in part by variations in the criteria used to define TRS, as well as by the biological and clinical heterogeneity of TRS. Clinical trial designs for new treatments should be informed by this heterogeneity, and further clinical research is needed to more clearly understand the underlying neurobiology of TRS and to optimize treatment for patients with TRS.

          Related collections

          Most cited references80

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Meta-analysis of cytokine alterations in schizophrenia: clinical status and antipsychotic effects.

          Schizophrenia is associated with immune system dysfunction, including aberrant cytokine levels. We performed a meta-analysis of these associations, considering effects of clinical status and antipsychotic treatment following an acute illness exacerbation. We identified articles by searching PubMed, PsychInfo, and Institute for Scientific Information and the reference lists of identified studies. Forty studies met the inclusion criteria. Effect sizes were similar for studies of acutely relapsed inpatients (AR) and first-episode psychosis (FEP). Interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) appeared to be state markers, as they were increased in AR and FEP (p < .001 for each) and normalized with antipsychotic treatment (p < .001, p = .008, and p = .005, respectively). In contrast, IL-12, interferon-γ (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and soluble IL-2 receptor (sIL-2R) appeared to be trait markers, as levels remained elevated in acute exacerbations and following antipsychotic treatment. There was no difference in IL-6 levels between stable medicated outpatients and control subjects (p = .69). In the cerebrospinal fluid, IL-1β was significantly decreased in schizophrenia versus controls (p = .01). Similar effect sizes in AR and FEP suggest that the association between cytokine abnormalities and acute exacerbations of schizophrenia is independent of antipsychotic medications. While some cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TGF-β) may be state markers for acute exacerbations, others (IL-12, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and sIL-2R) may be trait markers. Although these results could provide the basis for future hypothesis testing, most studies did not control for potential confounding factors such as body mass index and smoking. Copyright © 2011 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Treatment Response and Resistance in Psychosis (TRRIP) Working Group Consensus Guidelines on Diagnosis and Terminology.

            Research and clinical translation in schizophrenia is limited by inconsistent definitions of treatment resistance and response. To address this issue, the authors evaluated current approaches and then developed consensus criteria and guidelines.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Antipsychotic drugs versus placebo for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

              Relapse prevention with antipsychotic drugs compared with placebo in patients with schizophrenia has not been sufficiently addressed by previous systematic reviews. We aimed to assess the association between such drugs and various outcomes in patients with schizophrenia to resolve controversial issues. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's specialised register for reports published before Nov 11, 2008; and PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov for those before June 8, 2011. We also contacted pharmaceutical companies and searched the reference lists of included studies and previous reviews. Randomised trials of patients with schizophrenia continued on or withdrawn from any antipsychotic drug regimen after stabilisation were eligible. Our primary outcome was relapse between 7 and 12 months. We also examined safety and various functional outcomes. We used the random effects model and verified results for the primary outcome with a fixed effects model. Heterogeneity was investigated with subgroup and meta-regression analyses. We identified 116 suitable reports from 65 trials, with data for 6493 patients. Antipsychotic drugs significantly reduced relapse rates at 1 year (drugs 27%vs placebo 64%; risk ratio [RR] 0·40, 95% CI 0·33-0·49; number needed to treat to benefit [NNTB] 3, 95% CI 2-3). Fewer patients given antipsychotic drugs than placebo were readmitted (10%vs 26%; RR 0·38, 95% CI 0·27-0·55; NNTB 5, 4-9), but less than a third of relapsed patients had to be admitted. Limited evidence suggested better quality of life (standardised mean difference -0·62, 95% CI -1·15 to -0·09) and fewer aggressive acts (2%vs 12%; RR 0·27, 95% CI 0·15-0·52; NNTB 11, 6-100) with antipsychotic drugs than with placebo. Employment data were scarce and too few deaths were reported to allow significant differences to be identified. More patients given antipsychotic drugs than placebo gained weight (10%vs 6%; RR 2·07, 95% CI 2·31-3·25), had movement disorders (16%vs 9%; 1·55, 1·25-1·93), and experienced sedation (13%vs 9%; 1·50, 1·22-1·84). Substantial heterogeneity in size of effect was recorded. In subgroup analyses, number of episodes, whether patients were in remission, abrupt or gradual withdrawal of treatment, length of stability before trial entry, first-generation or second-generation drugs, and allocation concealment method did not significantly affect relapse risk. Depot preparations reduced relapse (RR 0·31, 95% CI 0·21-0·41) more than did oral drugs (0·46, 0·37-0·57; p=0·03); depot haloperidol (RR 0·14, 95% CI 0·04-0·55) and fluphenazine (0·23, 0·14-0·39) had the greatest effects. The effects of antipsychotic drugs were greater in two unblinded trials (0·26, 0·17-0·39) than in most blinded studies (0·42, 0·35-0·51; p= 0·03). In a meta-regression, the difference between drug and placebo decreased with study length. Maintenance treatment with antipsychotic drugs benefits patients with schizophrenia. The advantages of these drugs must be weighed against their side-effects. Future studies should focus on outcomes of social participation and clarify the long-term morbidity and mortality of these drugs. German Ministry of Education and Research. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                oliver.howes@kcl.ac.uk
                Journal
                NPJ Schizophr
                NPJ Schizophr
                NPJ Schizophrenia
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2334-265X
                7 January 2020
                7 January 2020
                2020
                : 6
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0668 7243, GRID grid.266093.8, University of California at Irvine, ; Irvine, CA USA
                [2 ]Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Hempstead, NY USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.440243.5, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, ; Glen Oaks, NY USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9566 0634, GRID grid.250903.d, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Psychiatric Neuroscience Center of Excellence, ; Manhasset, NY USA
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2218 4662, GRID grid.6363.0, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, ; Berlin, Germany
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8753, GRID grid.137628.9, Department of Psychiatry, , New York University School of Medicine, ; New York, NY USA
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2157 2938, GRID grid.17063.33, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, ; Toronto, ON Canada
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9632 6718, GRID grid.19006.3e, The Semel Institute for Neuroscience at UCLA, ; Los Angeles, CA USA
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0384 5381, GRID grid.417119.b, The VA Desert Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, ; Los Angeles, CA USA
                [10 ]ISNI 0000000419368729, GRID grid.21729.3f, Department of Psychiatry, , Columbia University Irving Medical Center, ; New York, NY USA
                [11 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2322 6764, GRID grid.13097.3c, King’s College, ; London, UK
                [12 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2113 8111, GRID grid.7445.2, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College, ; London, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0288-309X
                Article
                90
                10.1038/s41537-019-0090-z
                6946650
                31911624
                f9ef46c3-7a17-45f9-ac56-e78a81b3e2fd
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 6 September 2019
                : 31 October 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Lundbeck
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                schizophrenia
                schizophrenia

                Comments

                Comment on this article