26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The clinical efficacy of Afatinib 30 mg daily as starting dose may not be inferior to Afatinib 40 mg daily in patients with stage IV lung Adenocarcinoma harboring exon 19 or exon 21 mutations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Afatinib is a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Compared to cytotoxic chemotherapy, afatinib has been shown to have better efficacy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations. However, 40 mg daily as the initial dose is often accompanied by serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and 28 to 53.3% of patients required a dose reduction. No previous study has compared the clinical efficacy and ADRs of different initial doses (40 mg vs. 30 mg daily) of afatinib in lung cancer treatment.

          Methods

          Patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma diagnosed and treated in two Kaohsiung Medical University-affiliated hospitals in Taiwan between May 2014 and August 2016 were identified and followed until December 2016. Demographic characteristics, responses, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and ADRs were recorded.

          Result

          A total of 48 patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma harboring susceptible EGFR mutations who received afatinib as their first-line therapy were enrolled. Patients using 30 mg daily as the initial dose tended to be older and female and have a smaller body size. The patients using 30 mg of afatinib daily as their initial dose had a similar response rate to those receiving 40 mg daily (76% vs. 95%, p = 0.0862) and the same disease control rate (100% vs. 100%, p = 0.1486). The PFS was similar between the patients receiving 30 mg or 40 mg of afatinib daily (median PFS: 469 vs. 443 days, log-rank p = 0.8418). Patients receiving 30 mg daily had a significantly lower incidence of diarrhea than those using 40 mg daily (41% vs. 100%, p < 0.0001).

          Conclusion

          An initial afatinib dose of 30 mg daily had similar response and progression-free survival rates as an initial dose of 40 mg daily, but resulted in fewer serious ADRs in this study.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pooled safety analysis of EGFR-TKI treatment for EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

          Three epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) - afatinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib - are available for the treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the long-term exposure of such patients to EGFR-TKIs, the toxicological properties of these agents in these individuals may differ from those observed in unselected patients. We compared the frequencies of severe adverse events (AEs) among EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients treated with these three EGFR-TKIs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Liver metastasis predicts poorer prognosis in stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patients receiving first-line gefitinib.

            Gefitinib is currently used as a first-line therapy in patients of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with susceptible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, treatment outcomes of these patients vary. This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of specific metastatic sites on treatment outcomes of patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with susceptible EGFR mutations receiving first-line gefitinib, focusing on the impact of liver metastasis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Pemetrexed had significantly better clinical efficacy in patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with susceptible EGFR mutations receiving platinum-based chemotherapy after developing resistance to the first-line gefitinib treatment

              Background Increased evidences show that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as gefitinib could prolong progression-free survival (PFS) compared with cytotoxic chemotherapy for metastatic lung nonsquamous cell carcinoma harboring susceptible EGFR mutation, and gefitinib was served as the first-line therapy. However, acquired resistance is inevitable, but the salvage therapies are still unclear. Patients and methods We designed a retrospective study of the salvage therapy and enrolled patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma who had mutated EGFR and developed an acquired resistance to the first-line gefitinib in two university-affiliated hospitals in Taiwan during June 2011 to December 2014. Age, sex, smoking history, EGFR gene mutation, performance statuses, response rate, PFS2 (the PFS in salvage therapy), and overall survival (OS2, the OS in salvage therapy) were recorded. Results Two hundred and nine patients with mutated EGFR and who took gefitinib as first-line therapy were identified in the period, and a total of 98 patients who had been treated with salvage therapy with cytotoxic chemotherapy or erlotinib were eligible for this study. The overall response rate of second salvage therapy is 13%, and none of them received erlotinib. Patients who received chemotherapy had a trend for better PFS2 than those who received erlotinib (4.3 months vs 3.0 months, P=0.1417) but not in OS. Furthermore, patients who received platinum-based doublet had a trend for better PFS2 and a significantly better OS2 than those who received chemotherapy without platinum (PFS2: 4.9 months vs 2.6 months, P=0.0584; OS2: 16.1 months vs 6.7 months, P=0.0007). Analyses of the patients receiving platinum-based doublet showed that patients receiving pemetrexed had a significantly better PFS2 (6.4 months vs 4.1 months, P=0.0083) and a trend for better OS2 than those without pemetrexed treatment. Conclusion Pemetrexed-based platinum chemotherapy may be the most optimal therapy in acquired resistance to gefitinib. Further prospective randomized controlled study is needed urgently.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                cheya@cc.kmu.edu.tw
                960216kmuh@gmail.com
                jenyuhung@gmail.com
                mhsuan99@yahoo.com.tw
                yingming@kmu.edu.tw
                poppy_snow@hotmail.com
                940360@mail.kmuh.org.tw
                d730093@cc.kmu.edu.tw
                shyang@kmu.edu.tw
                +886-7-320-8159 , chong@kmu.edu.tw
                Journal
                BMC Pharmacol Toxicol
                BMC Pharmacol Toxicol
                BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology
                BioMed Central (London )
                2050-6511
                13 December 2017
                13 December 2017
                2017
                : 18
                : 82
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9476 5696, GRID grid.412019.f, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, , Kaohsiung Medical University, ; Kaohsiung, Taiwan
                [2 ]Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100, Tzyou First Road, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
                [3 ]Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100, Tzyou First Road, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9476 5696, GRID grid.412019.f, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, , Kaohsiung Medical University, ; Kaohsiung, Taiwan
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9476 5696, GRID grid.412019.f, Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, , Kaohsiung Medical University, ; Kaohsiung, Taiwan
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9476 5696, GRID grid.412019.f, Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, , Kaohsiung Medical University, ; Kaohsiung, Taiwan
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9476 5696, GRID grid.412019.f, Department of Respiratory Therapy, College of Medicine, , Kaohsiung Medical University, ; Kaohsiung, Taiwan
                Article
                190
                10.1186/s40360-017-0190-1
                5729426
                29237484
                f943ff68-b921-4de4-9203-b4a9796a1496
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 25 March 2017
                : 5 December 2017
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Toxicology
                lung cancer,adenocarcinoma,afatinib,epidermal growth factor receptor,tyrosine kinase inhibitor;diarrhea,adverse drug reaction

                Comments

                Comment on this article