89
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Human and Mouse Mononuclear Phagocyte Networks: A Tale of Two Species?

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dendritic cells (DCs), monocytes, and macrophages are a heterogeneous population of mononuclear phagocytes that are involved in antigen processing and presentation to initiate and regulate immune responses to pathogens, vaccines, tumor, and tolerance to self. In addition to their afferent sentinel function, DCs and macrophages are also critical as effectors and coordinators of inflammation and homeostasis in peripheral tissues. Harnessing DCs and macrophages for therapeutic purposes has major implications for infectious disease, vaccination, transplantation, tolerance induction, inflammation, and cancer immunotherapy. There has been a paradigm shift in our understanding of the developmental origin and function of the cellular constituents of the mononuclear phagocyte system. Significant progress has been made in tandem in both human and mouse mononuclear phagocyte biology. This progress has been accelerated by comparative biology analysis between mouse and human, which has proved to be an exceptionally fruitful strategy to harmonize findings across species. Such analyses have provided unexpected insights and facilitated productive reciprocal and iterative processes to inform our understanding of human and mouse mononuclear phagocytes. In this review, we discuss the strategies, power, and utility of comparative biology approaches to integrate recent advances in human and mouse mononuclear phagocyte biology and its potential to drive forward clinical translation of this knowledge. We also present a functional framework on the parallel organization of human and mouse mononuclear phagocyte networks.

          Related collections

          Most cited references158

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Batf3 deficiency reveals a critical role for CD8alpha+ dendritic cells in cytotoxic T cell immunity.

          Although in vitro observations suggest that cross-presentation of antigens is mediated primarily by CD8alpha+ dendritic cells, in vivo analysis has been hampered by the lack of systems that selectively eliminate this cell lineage. We show that deletion of the transcription factor Batf3 ablated development of CD8alpha+ dendritic cells, allowing us to examine their role in immunity in vivo. Dendritic cells from Batf3-/- mice were defective in cross-presentation, and Batf3-/- mice lacked virus-specific CD8+ T cell responses to West Nile virus. Importantly, rejection of highly immunogenic syngeneic tumors was impaired in Batf3-/- mice. These results suggest an important role for CD8alpha+ dendritic cells and cross-presentation in responses to viruses and in tumor rejection.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Taking dendritic cells into medicine.

            Dendritic cells (DCs) orchestrate a repertoire of immune responses that bring about resistance to infection and silencing or tolerance to self. In the settings of infection and cancer, microbes and tumours can exploit DCs to evade immunity, but DCs also can generate resistance, a capacity that is readily enhanced with DC-targeted vaccines. During allergy, autoimmunity and transplant rejection, DCs instigate unwanted responses that cause disease, but, again, DCs can be harnessed to silence these conditions with novel therapies. Here we present some medical implications of DC biology that account for illness and provide opportunities for prevention and therapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Of mice and not men: differences between mouse and human immunology.

              Mice are the experimental tool of choice for the majority of immunologists and the study of their immune responses has yielded tremendous insight into the workings of the human immune system. However, as 65 million years of evolution might suggest, there are significant differences. Here we outline known discrepancies in both innate and adaptive immunity, including: balance of leukocyte subsets, defensins, Toll receptors, inducible NO synthase, the NK inhibitory receptor families Ly49 and KIR, FcR, Ig subsets, the B cell (BLNK, Btk, and lambda5) and T cell (ZAP70 and common gamma-chain) signaling pathway components, Thy-1, gammadelta T cells, cytokines and cytokine receptors, Th1/Th2 differentiation, costimulatory molecule expression and function, Ag-presenting function of endothelial cells, and chemokine and chemokine receptor expression. We also provide examples, such as multiple sclerosis and delayed-type hypersensitivity, where complex multicomponent processes differ. Such differences should be taken into account when using mice as preclinical models of human disease.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immunol.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                25 June 2015
                2015
                : 6
                : 330
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Human Dendritic Cell Laboratory, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                [2] 2Musculoskeletal Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                Author notes

                Edited by: Shalin Naik, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Australia

                Reviewed by: Kristen J. Radford, University of Queensland, Australia; Simon Yona, University College London, UK

                *Correspondence: Muzlifah Haniffa, Human Dendritic Cell Laboratory, Institute of Cellular Medicine, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK, m.a.haniffa@ 123456ncl.ac.uk

                Specialty section: This article was submitted to Antigen Presenting Cell Biology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2015.00330
                4479794
                26124761
                f8451fa9-aa7a-49ce-8cdd-37ddb4eb7c57
                Copyright © 2015 Reynolds and Haniffa.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 11 May 2015
                : 12 June 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 238, Pages: 15, Words: 14801
                Funding
                Funded by: Intermediate Clinical Fellowship
                Award ID: WT088555A
                Funded by: Clinical Research Training Fellowship
                Award ID: WT098914MA
                Categories
                Immunology
                Review

                Immunology
                mononuclear phagocyte system,dendritic cells,macrophages,monocytes,comparative genomics
                Immunology
                mononuclear phagocyte system, dendritic cells, macrophages, monocytes, comparative genomics

                Comments

                Comment on this article