27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Systematic Review of the Impact of Genetic Counseling on Risk Perception Accuracy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This review presents an overview of the impact of genetic counseling on risk perception accuracy in papers published between January 2000 and February 2007. The results suggest that genetic counseling may have a positive impact on risk perception accuracy, though some studies observed no impact at all, or only for low-risk participants. Several implications for future research can be deduced. First, future researchers should link risk perception changes to objective risk estimates, define risk perception accuracy as the correct counseled risk estimate, and report both the proportion of individuals who correctly estimate their risk and the average overestimation of the risk. Second, as the descriptions of the counseling sessions were generally poor, future research should include more detailed description of these sessions and link their content to risk perception outcomes to allow interpretation of the results. Finally, the effect of genetic counseling should be examined for a wider variety of hereditary conditions. Genetic counselors should provide the necessary context in which counselees can understand risk information, use both verbal and numerical risk estimates to communicate personal risk information, and use visual aids when communicating numerical risk information.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A vision for the future of genomics research.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Verbal versus numerical probabilities: Efficiency, biases, and the preference paradox

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Goals of genetic counseling.

              The goals of genetic counseling have differed over the past three decades. Two schools of thought are prominent in reviewing past literature. One upholds the goal of preventing birth defects and genetic disorders while the other promotes a goal of improved psychological well-being in client adaptation to a genetic condition or risk. Both types of goals emphasize that clients should make their own reproductive decisions; however, the former relies on clients making decisions that will reduce the impact of genetic disorders. The differences in the types of goals may be due to the training and orientation of genetics health care providers, socio-cultural views, or priorities of health care settings. Regardless, there are ample reasons to dismiss the prevention of birth defects as a goal. This mini-review recommends use of genetic counseling sub-specialties as a framework for considering different client needs and thus different counseling goals and specific aims in the reproductive, pediatric/adult, and common disease settings. Given the extent of new genetic information, technologies, and the need to evaluate genetic counseling practice, genetics health care providers should work toward arriving at consensus on the goals of genetic counseling, and in doing so, the needs of clients should be considered.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31-43-3884278 , +31-43-36710 , c.smerecnik@gvo.unimaas.nl
                Journal
                J Genet Couns
                J Genet Couns
                Journal of Genetic Counseling
                Springer US (New York )
                1059-7700
                1573-3599
                1 June 2009
                1 June 2009
                2009
                : 18
                : 3
                : 217
                Affiliations
                GRID grid.5012.6, ISNI 0000000104816099, School for Public Health and Primary Care (Caphri), Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Science, , Maastricht University, ; P.O. Box 616, 6200 Maastricht, MD The Netherlands
                Article
                9210
                10.1007/s10897-008-9210-z
                7451018
                19291376
                f70ae043-5d08-43ba-a4ba-5bd81cbb540e
                © The Author(s) 2009

                Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

                History
                : 9 June 2008
                : 10 December 2008
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2009

                Genetics
                genetic counseling,risk perception,systematic review
                Genetics
                genetic counseling, risk perception, systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content251

                Cited by30

                Most referenced authors474