20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impute.me: An Open-Source, Non-profit Tool for Using Data From Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing to Calculate and Interpret Polygenic Risk Scores

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To date, interpretation of genomic information has focused on single variants conferring disease risk, but most disorders of major public concern have a polygenic architecture. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) give a single measure of disease liability by summarizing disease risk across hundreds of thousands of genetic variants. They can be calculated in any genome-wide genotype data-source, using a prediction model based on genome-wide summary statistics from external studies. As genome-wide association studies increase in power, the predictive ability for disease risk will also increase. Although PRSs are unlikely ever to be fully diagnostic, they may give valuable medical information for risk stratification, prognosis, or treatment response prediction. Public engagement is therefore becoming important on the potential use and acceptability of PRSs. However, the current public perception of genetics is that it provides “yes/no” answers about the presence/absence of a condition, or the potential for developing a condition, which in not the case for common, complex disorders with polygenic architecture. Meanwhile, unregulated third-party applications are being developed to satisfy consumer demand for information on the impact of lower-risk variants on common diseases that are highly polygenic. Often, applications report results from single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and disregard effect size, which is highly inappropriate for common, complex disorders where everybody carries risk variants. Tools are therefore needed to communicate our understanding of genetic vulnerability as a continuous trait, where a genetic liability confers risk for disease. Impute.me is one such tool, whose focus is on education and information on common, complex disorders with polygenetic architecture. Its research-focused open-source website allows users to upload consumer genetics data to obtain PRSs, with results reported on a population-level normal distribution. Diseases can only be browsed by International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) chapter–location or alphabetically, thus prompting the user to consider genetic risk scores in a medical context of relevance to the individual. Here, we present an overview of the implementation of the impute.me site, along with analysis of typical usage patterns, which may advance public perception of genomic risk and precision medicine.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Comparative genetic architectures of schizophrenia in East Asian and European populations

          Schizophrenia is a debilitating psychiatric disorder with approximately 1% lifetime risk globally. Large-scale schizophrenia genetic studies have reported primarily on European ancestry samples, potentially missing important biological insights. Here, we report the largest study to date of East Asian participants (22,778 schizophrenia cases and 35,362 controls), identifying 21 genome-wide significant associations in 19 genetic loci. Common genetic variants that confer risk for schizophrenia have highly similar effects between East Asian and European ancestries (r g = 0.98 ± 0.03), indicating that the genetic basis of schizophrenia and its biology are broadly shared across populations. A fixed-effect meta-analysis including individuals from East Asian and European ancestries identified 208 significant associations in 176 genetic loci (53 novel). Trans-ancestry fine-mapping reduced the sets of candidate causal variants in 44 loci. Polygenic risk scores had reduced performance when transferred across ancestries, highlighting the importance of including sufficient samples of major ancestral groups to ensure their generalizability across populations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            SNPedia: a wiki supporting personal genome annotation, interpretation and analysis

            SNPedia (http://www.SNPedia.com) is a wiki resource of the functional consequences of human genetic variation as published in peer-reviewed studies. Online since 2006 and freely available for personal use, SNPedia has focused on the medical, phenotypic and genealogical associations of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Entries are formatted to allow associations to be assigned to single genotypes as well as sets of genotypes (genosets). In this article, we discuss the growth of this resource and its use by affiliated software to create personal genome reports.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Visual Communication of Risk

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Genet
                Front Genet
                Front. Genet.
                Frontiers in Genetics
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-8021
                30 June 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 578
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Institute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Centre Sankt Hans , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [2] 2Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London , London, United Kingdom
                [3] 3Department of Medical & Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King’s College London , London, United Kingdom
                [4] 4Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, BC, Canada
                [5] 5Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, BC, Canada
                Author notes

                Edited by: Gustavo Glusman, Institute for Systems Biology (ISB), United States

                Reviewed by: Hervé Michel Chneiweiss, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France; S. Hong Lee, University of South Australia, Australia

                These authors have contributed equally to this work

                This article was submitted to ELSI in Science and Genetics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics

                Article
                10.3389/fgene.2020.00578
                7340159
                32714365
                6917ef72-13d2-4962-93c1-4e9d8db03373
                Copyright © 2020 Folkersen, Pain, Ingason, Werge, Lewis and Austin.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 29 November 2019
                : 11 May 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 0, Equations: 3, References: 51, Pages: 11, Words: 0
                Categories
                Genetics
                Original Research

                Genetics
                genetics,polygenic risk scores,direct-to-consumer,personal genomes,risk prediction
                Genetics
                genetics, polygenic risk scores, direct-to-consumer, personal genomes, risk prediction

                Comments

                Comment on this article