26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Immunogenicity assay of the Leishmune ® vaccine against canine visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Leishmune ® is the industrialized version of the FML-saponin vaccine which has been shown to develop 92–95% protection in vaccinated dogs and 76–80% vaccine efficacy against field canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) in Brazil. Leishmune ® has been proven to be safe and tolerable and a transmission-blocking vaccine which renders vaccinated dogs non-infectious to sand fly vectors. In the present investigation, 550 healthy seronegative dogs of endemic and epidemic areas of Brazil were monitored for Leishmune ®-induced immunogenicity during a 2-year trial. Another group of 588 untreated exposed dogs was also studied in parallel. Both groups were seronegative on day 0. The strong immunogenicity induced by Leishmune ® vaccine was demonstrated by the 98% of FML-seroconversion, increase in absorbencies, the 82.7% DTH positive reactions and increase in skin test size diameters, the average increase in CD8+ total lymphocytes population in blood (27.1%), expected for QS21 saponin-containing vaccine, the sustained proportions of CD4+ T cells, and the average increased proportions of CD21+ B lymphocytes (42.3%). The Leishmune ®-induced protection against CVL is demonstrated by the results: 98.8% asymptomatic dogs (at the end of first year) and 99% healthy survivors (at the end of the second year) among vaccinated dogs, compared to the 79.4% asymptomatic and 61% survivor dogs ( p < 0.001) monitored in the untreated exposed cohort. In spite of the low vaccine coverage, it was possible to detect a 66.1% ( p < 0.005) reduction in Belo Horizonte and an 80.2% ( p < 0.005) reduction in Araçatuba of the incidence of CVL among vaccinated dogs, when compared to the global incidence of CVL of each town, respectively. Our preliminary results support the potential use of Leishmune ® to prevent CVL epidemics.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Infectiousness in a cohort of brazilian dogs: why culling fails to control visceral leishmaniasis in areas of high transmission.

          The elimination of seropositive dogs in Brazil has been used to control zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis but with little success. To elucidate the reasons for this, the infectiousness of 50 sentinel dogs exposed to natural Leishmania chagasi infection was assessed through time by xenodiagnosis with the sandfly vector, Lutzomyia longipalpis. Eighteen (43%) of 42 infected dogs became infectious after a median of 333 days in the field (105 days after seroconversion). Seven highly infectious dogs (17%) accounted for >80% of sandfly infections. There were positive correlations between infectiousness and anti-Leishmania immunoglobulin G, parasite detection by polymerase chain reaction, and clinical disease (logistic regression, r2=0.08-0.18). The sensitivity of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect currently infectious dogs was high (96%) but lower in the latent period (<63%), and specificity was low (24%). Mathematical modeling suggests that culling programs fail because of high incidence of infection and infectiousness, the insensitivity of the diagnostic test to detect infectious dogs, and time delays between diagnosis and culling.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The logic of visceral leishmaniasis control.

            C. Dye (1996)
            Mathematical models are used to compare the effectiveness of various untested, unused, and undeveloped methods for controlling canine and human zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis (ZVL), including insecticides, vaccines, killing serologically positive and sick dogs, and drugs. For given percentage changes in control parameters, insecticides are the most effective control method. Where transmission occurs peridomestically and vectors are accessible to treatment, as in parts of tropical America, insecticides are expected to reduce the incidence of human ZVL even more effectively than they reduce the prevalence of canine leishmaniasis, a result that should encourage properly designed vector control trials. The second best strategy is to reduce susceptibility to leishmaniasis by vaccinating people or dogs, or by eliminating childhood malnutrition where it is common. Both killing vectors and reducing susceptibility (by whatever means) are more effective than killing dogs or treating them with drugs. In Europe, where vector control is less likely to be successful and canine leishmaniasis is a major veterinary problem, a dog vaccine is highly desirable. Better drugs for dogs will help case management but, with regard to bringing down the incidence in the dog population, immunization is the ultimate goal.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              CD8+ T cells are required for primary immunity in C57BL/6 mice following low-dose, intradermal challenge with Leishmania major.

              Standard murine models of cutaneous leishmaniasis, involving s.c. inoculation of large numbers of Leishmania major promastigotes, have not supported an essential role for CD8(+) T cells in the control of primary infection. Recently, a L. major model combining two main features of natural transmission, low parasite dose and inoculation into a dermal site, has been established in resistant C57BL/6 mice. In the present studies, C57BL/6 mice with CD8(+) T cell deficiencies, including CD8(-/-) and CD8-depleted mice, failed to control the growth of L. major following inoculation of 100 metacyclic promastigotes into the ear dermis. The resulting dermal pathology was minor and delayed. Lesion formation in wild-type mice was coincident with the killing of parasites in the inoculation site. Both events were associated with the accumulation of CD8(+) T lymphocytes in the skin and with the capacity of CD8(+) T cells recovered from draining lymph nodes or infected dermis to release IFN-gamma following coculture with infected dendritic cells. Reconstitution of resistance to L. major in RAG(-/-) mice using T cells from naive donors was optimal when both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells were transferred. Primed CD8(+) T lymphocytes obtained from C57BL/6 mice during the acute stage of infection were able to mediate both pathology and immunity when transferred alone. The low dose, intradermal challenge model reveals that CD8(+) T cells play an essential role in both pathogenesis of and immunity to primary infection with L. major in the skin.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Vaccine
                Vaccine
                Vaccine
                Elsevier Ltd.
                0264-410X
                1873-2518
                1 August 2008
                15 September 2008
                1 August 2008
                : 26
                : 39
                : 4991-4997
                Affiliations
                [a ]Instituto de Microbiologia, “Prof. Paulo de Góes”, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), CCS, Cidade Universitária, Ilha do Fundão, CP 68040, CEP 21941-590 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
                [b ]Fort Dodge Saúde Animal Ltda, Rua Luiz Fernando Rodriguez 1701, CEP 13064-798 Campinas, SP, Brazil
                [c ]Centro de Controle de Zoonoses, Rua Dr Luis de Almeida 145, CEP 16050-203 Araçatuba, SP, Brazil
                [d ]Centro de Controle de Zoonoses, Rua Ceilandia 322, Conj. Alvorada, CEP 59122-360 Natal, RN, Brazil
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Tel.: +55 21 25626742; fax: +55 21 560 8344/8028. immgcpa@ 123456micro.ufrj.br
                Article
                S0264-410X(08)00973-0
                10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.07.029
                7173152
                18675868
                f6c07e3f-1b5c-4ca5-af07-ad15a22d99fc
                Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 14 April 2008
                : 14 July 2008
                : 14 July 2008
                Categories
                Article

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                leishmune®,fml-saponin vaccine,qs21 saponin,quillaja saponaria,canine visceral leishmaniasis,zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis,kala-azar

                Comments

                Comment on this article