ScienceOpen: research and publishing network

For Researchers

Search
Advanced search

3

views

    

0

recommends

0

shares

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Assessing the quality of studies in meta‐research: Review/guidelines on the most important quality assessment tools

Author(s): Claudio Luchini ¹ , Nicola Veronese ² , Alessia Nottegar ³ , Jae Il Shin ⁴ , Giovanni Gentile ⁵ , Umberto Granziol ⁶ , Pinar Soysal ⁷ , Ovidiu Alexinschi ⁸ , Lee Smith ⁹ , Marco Solmi ⁵

Publication date (Electronic): September 15 2020

Journal: Pharmaceutical Statistics

Publisher: Wiley

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher PubMed

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Related collections

Most cited references 35

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: found

Is Open Access

The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

Julian P. T. Higgins, Douglas G. Altman, Peter C. Gøtzsche … (2014)

Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate

0 comments Cited 7588 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff … (2012)

David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses

0 comments Cited 5147 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses.

Andreas Stang (2010)

0 comments Cited 4119 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Author and article information

Contributors

Lee Smith: (View ORCID Profile)

Journal

Title: Pharmaceutical Statistics

Abbreviated Title: Pharmaceutical Statistics

Publisher: Wiley

ISSN (Print): 1539-1604

ISSN (Electronic): 1539-1612

Publication date Created: January 2021

Publication date (Electronic): September 15 2020

Publication date (Print): January 2021

Volume: 20

Issue: 1

Pages: 185-195

Affiliations

[1 ]Department of Diagnostics and Public Health University and Hospital Trust of Verona Verona Italy

[2 ]National Research Council, Neuroscience Institute Padova Italy

[3 ]Department of Diagnostics, Section of Pathology San Bortolo Hospital Vicenza Italy

[4 ]Department of Pediatrics Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea

[5 ]Department of Neurosciences University of Padova Padova Italy

[6 ]Department of General Psychology University of Padova Padova Italy

[7 ]Department of Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Bezmialem Vakif University Istanbul Turkey

[8 ]Institute of Psychiatry “Socola” Iasi Romania

[9 ]The Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences Anglia Ruskin University Cambridge UK

Article

DOI: 10.1002/pst.2068

PubMed ID: 32935459

SO-VID: f626f35d-d002-49b5-9a04-4a67c3357da0

Copyright © © 2021

License:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

History

Data availability:

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Similar content 1,467

See all similar

Cited by 37

See all cited by

Most referenced authors 1,218

See all reference authors