4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Contact tracing in Austria, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine, and Kosovo during the COVID-19 pandemic: response review and good practices

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          During the COVID-19 pandemic, effective contact tracing was recognized as a crucial public health response to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and reduce COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality, particularly before widespread vaccination. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended implementing active surveillance strategies to trace and quarantine contacts of confirmed or suspected COVID-19 cases.

          Methods

          A detailed review and analysis of the COVID-19 contact tracing responses was conducted in five European countries and territories, between March 2021 and August 2022. The countries and territories were selected to ensure geographical representation across the WHO European Region and applied a mixed-methods approach of in-depth interviews with various stakeholders across different administrative levels to identify good practices in COVID-19 contact tracing. The interviews covered 12 themes, including methods and procedures for COVID-19 contact tracing, information technology, quality assurance and key performance indicators.

          Results

          The findings demonstrate that the policy approach, digitalization capabilities and implementation approach varied in the countries and territories and were dynamic throughout the pandemic. The analysis revealed that some practices were applicable across all countries and territories, while others were context-specific, catering to each country’s and territory’s unique needs. The study highlighted a need for all countries to institutionalize contact tracing as an essential function of existing health systems, to digitalize contact tracing practices and processes, and to build and retain contact tracing capacities for better pandemic preparedness.

          Conclusion

          The lessons related to COVID-19 contact tracing should be utilized to strengthen future outbreak response operations as part of epidemic and pandemic preparedness.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

          Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is the causative agent of the ongoing coronavirus disease pandemic. Initial estimates of the early dynamics of the outbreak in Wuhan, China, suggested a doubling time of the number of infected persons of 6–7 days and a basic reproductive number (R0) of 2.2–2.7. We collected extensive individual case reports across China and estimated key epidemiologic parameters, including the incubation period (4.2 days). We then designed 2 mathematical modeling approaches to infer the outbreak dynamics in Wuhan by using high-resolution domestic travel and infection data. Results show that the doubling time early in the epidemic in Wuhan was 2.3–3.3 days. Assuming a serial interval of 6–9 days, we calculated a median R0 value of 5.7 (95% CI 3.8–8.9). We further show that active surveillance, contact tracing, quarantine, and early strong social distancing efforts are needed to stop transmission of the virus.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Community engagement for COVID-19 prevention and control: a rapid evidence synthesis

            Introduction Community engagement has been considered a fundamental component of past outbreaks, such as Ebola. However, there is concern over the lack of involvement of communities and ‘bottom-up’ approaches used within COVID-19 responses thus far. Identifying how community engagement approaches have been used in past epidemics may support more robust implementation within the COVID-19 response. Methodology A rapid evidence review was conducted to identify how community engagement is used for infectious disease prevention and control during epidemics. Three databases were searched in addition to extensive snowballing for grey literature. Previous epidemics were limited to Ebola, Zika, SARS, Middle East respiratory syndromeand H1N1 since 2000. No restrictions were applied to study design or language. Results From 1112 references identified, 32 articles met our inclusion criteria, which detail 37 initiatives. Six main community engagement actors were identified: local leaders, community and faith-based organisations, community groups, health facility committees, individuals and key stakeholders. These worked on different functions: designing and planning, community entry and trust building, social and behaviour change communication, risk communication, surveillance and tracing, and logistics and administration. Conclusion COVID-19’s global presence and social transmission pathways require social and community responses. This may be particularly important to reach marginalised populations and to support equity-informed responses. Aligning previous community engagement experience with current COVID-19 community-based strategy recommendations highlights how communities can play important and active roles in prevention and control. Countries worldwide are encouraged to assess existing community engagement structures and use community engagement approaches to support contextually specific, acceptable and appropriate COVID-19 prevention and control measures.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Eur J Public Health
                Eur J Public Health
                eurpub
                The European Journal of Public Health
                Oxford University Press
                1101-1262
                1464-360X
                April 2024
                22 January 2024
                22 January 2024
                : 34
                : 2
                : 387-393
                Affiliations
                Infectious Hazard Management, WHO Health Emergencies Programme, WHO Regional Office for Europe , Copenhagen, Denmark
                Infectious Hazard Management, WHO Health Emergencies Programme, WHO Regional Office for Europe , Copenhagen, Denmark
                Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection , Vienna, Austria
                Georgian Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology , Tbilisi, Georgia
                National Institute of Public Health , Pristina, Kosovo
                Department of Disease Prevention and State Sanitary and Epidemiological Surveillance, Ministry of Health , Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
                Public Health Center, Ministry of Health , Kyiv, Ukraine
                Infectious Hazard Management, WHO Health Emergencies Programme, WHO Regional Office for Europe , Copenhagen, Denmark
                Infectious Hazard Management, WHO Health Emergencies Programme, WHO Regional Office for Europe , Copenhagen, Denmark
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Michala Hegermann-Lindencrone, WHO Health Emergencies Programme,  WHO Regional Office for Europe, UN City, Marmorvej 51, 2100 København, Denmark. Tel. +45 26818337, e-mail: hegermannlindenc@ 123456who.int

                Ahmed Taha Aboushady and Claire Blackmore contributed equally to this study.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8245-6591
                Article
                ckad217
                10.1093/eurpub/ckad217
                10990501
                38261364
                f53c7b02-2bb8-41fe-bccd-daf8b21e360d
                © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 7
                Funding
                Funded by: WHO Regional Office for Europe;
                Funded by: WHO Solidarity Fund;
                Categories
                Covid-19
                AcademicSubjects/MED00860
                AcademicSubjects/SOC01210
                AcademicSubjects/SOC02610

                Public health
                Public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article