0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Late development of giant hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm following abdominal trauma due to tire blast: case report and literature review

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Giant hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm is rare but could have a significant implication. A 35-year-old male was severely injured by a truck tire explosion and presented with hypotension and positive focused assessment with sonography in trauma scan. After resuscitation, abdomen computed tomography (CT) scan showed a Grade 4 liver injury. The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit, and the liver injury was treated conservatively. Seventeen days later, he developed abdominal pain with deep epigastric tenderness. Repeated abdomen CT scan detected a giant hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm. Embolization was achieved using gel foam with the placement of six microcoils. The patient had an uneventful recovery. Late development of giant hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm is a rare complication of hepatic trauma and could be life-threatening. Timely identification and treatment with endovascular intervention are crucial. We recommend, especially when dealing with trauma related to blast injury, follow-up images for patients who develop symptoms suggestive of hepatic injury.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Status of nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injuries in 1995: a multicenter experience with 404 patients.

          Nonoperative management is presently considered the treatment modality of choice in over 50% of adult patients sustaining blunt hepatic trauma who meet inclusion criteria. A multicenter study was retrospectively undertaken to assess whether the combined experiences at level I trauma centers could validate the currently reported high success rate, low morbidity, and virtually nonexistent mortality associated with this approach. Thirteen level I trauma centers accrued 404 adult patients sustaining blunt hepatic injuries managed nonoperatively over the last 5 years. Seventy-two percent of the injuries resulted from motor vehicle crashes. The mean injury severity score for the entire group was 20.2 (range, 4-75), and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-computerized axial tomography scan grading was as follows: grade I, 19% (n = 76); grade II, 31% (n = 124); grade III, 36% (n = 146); grade IV, 10% (n = 42); and grade V, 4% (n = 16). There were 27 deaths (7%) in the series, with 59% directly related to head trauma. Only two deaths (0.4%) could be attributed to hepatic injury. Twenty-one (5%) complications were documented, with the most common being hemorrhage, occurring in 14 (3.5%). Only 3 (0.7%) of these 14 patients required surgical intervention, 6 were treated by transfusions alone (0.5 to 5 U), 4 underwent angio-embolization, and 1 was further observed. Other complications included 2 bilomas and 3 perihepatic abscesses (all drained percutaneously). Two small bowel injuries were initially missed (0.5%), and diagnosed 2 and 3 days after admission. Overall, 6 patients required operative intervention: 3 for hemorrhage, 2 for missed enteric injuries, and 1 for persistent sepsis after unsuccessful percutaneous drainage. Average length of stay was 13 days. Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injuries is clearly the treatment modality of choice in hemodynamically stable patients, irrespective of grade of injury or degree of hemoperitoneum. Current data would suggest that 50 to 80% (47% in this series) of all adult patients with blunt hepatic injuries are candidates for this form of therapy. Exactly 98.5% of patients analyzed in this study successfully avoided operative intervention. Bleeding complications are infrequently encountered (3.5%) and can often be managed nonoperatively. Although grades IV and V injuries composed 14% of the series, they represented 66.6% of the patients requiring operative intervention and thus merit constant re-evaluation and close observation in critical care units. The optimal time for follow-up computerized axial tomography scanning seems to be within 7 to 10 days after injury.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Post-traumatic hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm treated with endovascular embolization and thrombin injection.

            Post-traumatic hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm is uncommon, appearing in approximately 1% of hepatic trauma cases. Most are extrahepatic (80%) and have a late onset. Although they are usually asymptomatic, they should always be treated becasue of the high risk of complications, especially breakage. Currently the treatment of choice is endovascular embolization with coils or the exclusion of the pseudoaneurysm using other intravascular devices. Recently there have been accounts of a treatment that combines embolization with coils and image-guided percutaneous human thrombin injection. We present a case of post-traumatic hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm that was successfully treated using this combined technique.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Hepatic pseudoaneurysm after traumatic liver injury; is CT follow-up warranted?

              Introduction Hepatic pseudoaneurysm (HPA) is a rare complication after liver trauma, yet it is potentially fatal, as it can lead to sudden severe haemorrhage. The risk of developing posttraumatic HPA is one of the arguments for performing follow-up CT of patients with liver injuries. The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of HPA post liver trauma. Methods A retrospective study from 2000-2010 of conservatively treated patients with blunt liver trauma was performed to investigate the incidence and nature of HPA. After the initial CT scan patients were admitted to the department and if not clinically indicated prior a follow-up CT was performed on day 4-5. Results A total of 259 non-operatively managed patients with liver injury were reviewed. 188 had a follow-up CT or US and in 7 patients a HPA was diagnosed. All aneurysms were treated with angiographic embolization and there were no treatment failures. There was no correlation between the severity of the liver injury and development of HPA. 5 out of 7 patients were asymptomatic and would have been discharged without treatment if the protocol did not include a default follow-up CT. Conclusions In conclusion, this study shows that HPA is not correlated to the severity of liver injury and it develops in 4% of patients after traumatic liver injury. In order to avoid potentially life-threatening haemorrhage from a post trauma hepatic pseudoaneurysm, it seems appropriate to do follow-up CT as part of the conservative management of blunt and penetrating liver injuries.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Surg Case Rep
                J Surg Case Rep
                jscr
                Journal of Surgical Case Reports
                Oxford University Press
                2042-8812
                December 2021
                20 December 2021
                20 December 2021
                : 2021
                : 12
                : rjab564
                Affiliations
                Surgery Department , Section of Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital (HGH), Doha, Qatar
                Surgery Department , Section of Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital (HGH), Doha, Qatar
                Clinical Research , Trauma and Vascular Surgery Section, HGH, Doha, Qatar
                Department of Clinical Medicine , Weill Cornell Medical College, Doha, Qatar
                Radiology Department , HGH, Doha, Qatar
                Surgery Department , Section of Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital (HGH), Doha, Qatar
                Surgery Department , Section of Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital (HGH), Doha, Qatar
                Surgery Department , Section of Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital (HGH), Doha, Qatar
                Trauma and Vascular Surgery , Department of Surgery, HGH, Doha, Qatar
                Author notes
                Correspondence address. Department of Clinical Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical School & Clinical Research, Trauma & Vascular surgery, Hamad General Hospital, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar. Tel: +974-44394029; Fax: +97444394031; E-mail: aymanco65@ 123456yahoo.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2584-953X
                Article
                rjab564
                10.1093/jscr/rjab564
                8689683
                34938427
                f53c23a9-a2d9-4836-a77e-14f078c7ff9e
                Published by Oxford University Press and JSCR Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 7 October 2021
                : 22 November 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 4
                Categories
                Case Report
                AcademicSubjects/MED00910

                Comments

                Comment on this article