7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The landscape of inequalities in dementia across Europe: First insights from the INTERDEM taskforce

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Getting a diagnosis of dementia does not equate to equitable access to care. People with dementia and unpaid carers face many barriers to care, which can vary within, and across, different countries and cultures. With little evidence across different countries, the aim of this scoping exercise was to identify the different and similar types of inequalities in dementia across Europe, and provide recommendations for addressing these.

          Methods

          We conducted a brief online survey with INTERDEM and INTERDEM Academy members across Europe, and with members of Alzheimer Europe's European Working Group of People with Dementia and Carers in February and March 2023. Members were asked about whether inequalities in dementia care existed within their country; if yes, to highlight three key inequalities. Responses on barriers were coded into groups, and frequencies of inequalities were calculated. Highlighted inequalities were discussed and prioritised at face‐to‐face and virtual consensus meetings in England, Ireland, Italy, and Poland, involving people with dementia, unpaid carers, health and social care providers, and non‐profit organisations.

          Results

          Forty‐nine academics, PhD students, people with dementia and unpaid carers from 10 countries (Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Malta, Netherlands, UK) completed the survey. The most frequently identified inequalities focused on unawareness and lack of information, higher level system issues (i.e. lack of communication among care professionals), lack of service suitability, and stigma. Other barriers included workforce training and knowledge, financial costs, culture and language, lack of single‐point‐of‐contact person, age, and living location/postcode lottery. There was general consensus among people living dementia and care providers of unawareness as a key barrier in different European countries, with varied priorities in Ireland depending on geographical location.

          Conclusions

          These findings provide a first insight on dementia inequalities across Europe, generate cross‐country learnings on how to address these inequalities in dementia, and can underpin further solution‐focused research that informs policy and key decision makers to implement changes.

          Key points

          • There are numerous similar barriers to accessing dementia care across different European countries.

          • Some of the key challenges to equitable dementia care are lack of workforce knowledge, lack of information, stigma, financial barriers, and lack of communication among care professionals.

          • Cultural challenges, postcode lottery, and service suitability were also raised as key barriers to dementia care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Barriers and facilitators to the access to and use of formal dementia care: findings of a focus group study with people with dementia, informal carers and health and social care professionals in eight European countries

          Background People with dementia and informal carers often access formal care late in the process of dementia. The barriers and facilitators to service use from the perspectives of different stakeholders involved are not well understood. Thus, we aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators of access to and utilisation of formal care from the perspectives of people with dementia, their informal carers and health and social care professionals. Method Focus groups with people with dementia, informal carers and professionals were conducted in eight European countries. Recruitment targeted people with dementia, informal carers with experience of formal care and professionals involved in providing (access to) formal care. Qualitative content analysis using open coding was used on a national level. Cross-national synthesis was based on the translated national reports. Results Overall, 55 focus groups with 261 participants were conducted, involving 51 people with dementia, 96 informal carers and 114 professionals. Sixteen categories describing barriers and facilitators were identified, referring to three global themes: Aspects related to 1) individuals involved, 2) the system or 3) overarching aspects. The attitudes and beliefs of people with dementia and their carers may have a major impact, and they often serve as barriers. Formal care was perceived as a threat to the individual independence of people with dementia and was thus avoided as long as possible. A healthcare professional serving as a constant key contact person could be an essential facilitator to overcome these barriers. Contact should be initiated proactively, as early as possible, and a trusting and consistent relationship needs to be established. Beyond that, the findings largely confirm former research and show that barriers to accessing and using formal care still exist across Europe despite a number of national and European initiatives. Conclusion Further investigations are needed to elaborate how the concept of a key contact person could be integrated with existing case management approaches and how the independence and autonomy of people with dementia can be strengthened when formal care needs to be accessed and used. These may be meaningful facilitators regarding enhanced access to formal care for people with dementia and their families. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-0816-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reasons for institutionalization of people with dementia: informal caregiver reports from 8 European countries.

            To explore reasons for institutionalization of people with dementia according to informal caregivers as well as variation in reasons between countries.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              A systematic review of ethnicity and pathways to care in dementia

              To explore why people from minority ethnic (ME) groups with dementia present later to specialist diagnostic and therapeutic dementia services. We systematically reviewed the literature exploring how and why ME people with dementia present to specialist services. We included qualitative and quantitative studies that explored pathways to dementia specialist care in ME groups or determinants of whether ME people with dementia accessed specialist services. Included studies were independently evaluated for quality by two authors. We found 3 quantitative and 10 qualitative papers meeting our inclusion criteria. Barriers to accessing specialist help for dementia included: not conceptualizing dementia as an illness; believing dementia was a normal consequence of ageing; thinking dementia had spiritual, psychological, physical health or social causes; feeling that caring for the person with dementia was a personal or family responsibility; experiences of shame and stigma within the community; believing there was nothing that could be done to help; and negative experiences of healthcare services. Recognition of dementia as an illness and knowledge about dementia facilitated accessing help. There are significant barriers to help seeking for dementia in ME groups. These may explain why people from ME groups often presented to therapeutic and diagnostic services at a late stage in their illness. Further study is needed to elucidate the role that ethnicity and culture play in the help-seeking pathway for dementia, and to design and test interventions to improve equity of access to healthcare services. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
                Int J Geriat Psychiatry
                Wiley
                0885-6230
                1099-1166
                May 2024
                May 08 2024
                May 2024
                : 39
                : 5
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Primary Care & Mental Health University of Liverpool Liverpool UK
                [2 ] NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast Liverpool UK
                [3 ] Dementia Research Centre Queen Square Institute of Neurology University College London London UK
                [4 ] Division of Psychology and Language Sciences University College London London UK
                [5 ] Department of Psychology University of Bologna Bologna Italy
                [6 ] School of Psychology Dublin City University Dublin Ireland
                [7 ] Department of Psychiatry Wroclaw Medical University Wroclaw Poland
                [8 ] Department of Psychology Bournemouth University Poole UK
                [9 ] Alzheimer Europe Luxembourg Luxembourg
                [10 ] Department of Health Policy LSE London UK
                [11 ] Population Health Sciences Institute Newcastle University Newcastle UK
                [12 ] Alzheimer's Society London England
                [13 ] Deutsches Zentrum Fuer Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE) Greifswald Germany
                [14 ] School of Health Sciences University of Liverpool Liverpool UK
                Article
                10.1002/gps.6096
                f47fae2d-71bc-4b15-8b99-577da99259e6
                © 2024

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article