8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of antibiotics for children presenting to general practice with cough on adverse outcomes: secondary analysis from a multicentre prospective cohort study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Clinicians commonly prescribe antibiotics to prevent major adverse outcomes in children presenting in primary care with cough and respiratory symptoms, despite limited meaningful evidence of impact on these outcomes.

          Aim

          To estimate the effect of children’s antibiotic prescribing on adverse outcomes within 30 days of initial consultation.

          Design and setting

          Secondary analysis of 8320 children in a multicentre prospective cohort study, aged 3 months to <16 years, presenting in primary care across England with acute cough and other respiratory symptoms.

          Method

          Baseline clinical characteristics and antibiotic prescribing data were collected, and generalised linear models were used to estimate the effect of antibiotic prescribing on adverse outcomes within 30 days (subsequent hospitalisations and reconsultation for deterioration), controlling for clustering and clinicians’ propensity to prescribe antibiotics.

          Results

          Sixty-five (0.8%) children were hospitalised and 350 (4%) reconsulted for deterioration. Clinicians prescribed immediate and delayed antibiotics to 2313 (28%) and 771 (9%), respectively. Compared with no antibiotics, there was no clear evidence that antibiotics reduced hospitalisations (immediate antibiotic risk ratio [RR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.47 to 1.45; delayed RR 0.70, 95% CI = 0.26 to 1.90, overall P = 0.44). There was evidence that delayed (rather than immediate) antibiotics reduced reconsultations for deterioration (immediate RR 0.82, 95% CI = 0.65 to 1.07; delayed RR 0.55, 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.88, overall P = 0.024).

          Conclusion

          Most children presenting with acute cough and respiratory symptoms in primary care are not at risk of hospitalisation, and antibiotics may not reduce the risk. If an antibiotic is considered, a delayed antibiotic prescription may be preferable as it is likely to reduce reconsultation for deterioration.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Antibiotic prescribing in ambulatory pediatrics in the United States.

            Antibiotics are commonly prescribed for children with conditions for which they provide no benefit, including viral respiratory infections. Broad-spectrum antibiotic use is increasing, which adds unnecessary cost and promotes the development of antibiotic resistance. To provide a nationally representative analysis of antibiotic prescribing in ambulatory pediatrics according to antibiotic classes and diagnostic categories and identify factors associated with broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing. We used the National Ambulatory and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care surveys from 2006 to 2008, which are nationally representative samples of ambulatory care visits in the United States. We estimated the percentage of visits for patients younger than 18 years for whom antibiotics were prescribed according to antibiotic classes, those considered broad-spectrum, and diagnostic categories. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify demographic and clinical factors that were independently associated with broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing. Antibiotics were prescribed during 21% of pediatric ambulatory visits; 50% were broad-spectrum, most commonly macrolides. Respiratory conditions accounted for >70% of visits in which both antibiotics and broad-spectrum antibiotics were prescribed. Twenty-three percent of the visits in which antibiotics were prescribed were for respiratory conditions for which antibiotics are not clearly indicated, which accounts for >10 million visits annually. Factors independently associated with broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing included respiratory conditions for which antibiotics are not indicated, younger patients, visits in the South, and private insurance. Broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing in ambulatory pediatrics is extremely common and frequently inappropriate. These findings can inform the development and implementation of antibiotic stewardship efforts in ambulatory care toward the most important geographic regions, diagnostic conditions, and patient populations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Why do general practitioners prescribe antibiotics for sore throat? Grounded theory interview study.

              To understand why general practitioners prescribe antibiotics for some cases of sore throat and to explore the factors that influence their prescribing. Grounded theory interview study. General practice. 40 general practitioners: 25 in the maximum variety sample and 15 in the theoretical sample. General practitioners are uncertain which patients will benefit from antibiotics but prescribe for sicker patients and for patients from socioeconomically deprived backgrounds because of concerns about complications. They are also more likely to prescribe in pressured clinical contexts. Doctors are mostly comfortable with their prescribing decisions and are not prescribing to maintain the doctor-patient relationship. General practitioners have reduced prescribing for sore throat in response to research and policy initiatives. Further interventions to reduce prescribing would need to improve identification of patients at risk of complications and be workable in busy clinical situations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Research fellow and manager
                Role: PhD student
                Role: Associate professor
                Role: Senior research associate
                Role: Lecturer in infectious disease mathematical modelling
                Role: Professor in medical statistics
                Role: GP and professor of medical informatics and decision making
                Role: GP and professor of family medicine
                Role: Professor of primary care health services research
                Role: GP and professor of primary care
                Role: GP and professor of primary care research
                Journal
                Br J Gen Pract
                Br J Gen Pract
                bjgp
                The British Journal of General Practice
                Royal College of General Practitioners
                0960-1643
                1478-5242
                October 2018
                11 September 2018
                11 September 2018
                : 68
                : 675
                : e682-e693
                Affiliations
                National Institute for Health Research Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West, Bristol, UK.
                Centre for Academic Primary Care;
                Primary Care and Population Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, UK.
                Centre for Academic Primary Care;
                Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
                Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, St Michael’s Hospital, Bristol, UK.
                Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
                Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, US.
                Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, UK.
                Centre for Academic Primary Care;
                Primary Care and Population Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, UK.
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence Niamh M Redmond, National Institute for Health Research Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (NIHR CLAHRC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, 9th Floor, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol BS1 2NT, UK. Email: niamh.redmond@ 123456bristol.ac.uk
                Article
                10.3399/bjgp18X698873
                6145994
                30201827
                f45e0d49-5bc4-4488-b5c5-4a1e622e52fc
                © British Journal of General Practice 2018

                This article is Open Access: CC BY-NC 4.0 licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 March 2018
                : 18 May 2018
                : 02 July 2018
                Categories
                Research

                adverse outcomes,antibiotics,children,cohort studies,primary care,respiratory tract infections

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content173

                Cited by9

                Most referenced authors659