47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: A tutorial on the Savage–Dickey method

      , , ,
      Cognitive Psychology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In the field of cognitive psychology, the p-value hypothesis test has established a stranglehold on statistical reporting. This is unfortunate, as the p-value provides at best a rough estimate of the evidence that the data provide for the presence of an experimental effect. An alternative and arguably more appropriate measure of evidence is conveyed by a Bayesian hypothesis test, which prefers the model with the highest average likelihood. One of the main problems with this Bayesian hypothesis test, however, is that it often requires relatively sophisticated numerical methods for its computation. Here we draw attention to the Savage-Dickey density ratio method, a method that can be used to compute the result of a Bayesian hypothesis test for nested models and under certain plausible restrictions on the parameter priors. Practical examples demonstrate the method's validity, generality, and flexibility. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Cognitive Psychology
          Cognitive Psychology
          Elsevier BV
          00100285
          May 2010
          May 2010
          : 60
          : 3
          : 158-189
          Article
          10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.12.001
          20064637
          f35fd526-25f0-43e3-96f0-cae9309db914
          © 2010

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article