16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      PAM identification by CRISPR-Cas effector complexes: diversified mechanisms and structures

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Adaptive immunity of prokaryotes is mediated by CRISPR-Cas systems that employ a large variety of Cas protein effectors to identify and destroy foreign genetic material. The different targeting mechanisms of Cas proteins rely on the proper protection of the host genome sequence while allowing for efficient detection of target sequences, termed protospacers. A short DNA sequence, the protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM), is frequently used to mark proper target sites. Cas proteins have evolved a multitude of PAM-interacting domains, which enables them to cope with viral anti-CRISPR measures that alter the sequence or accessibility of PAM elements. In this review, we summarize known PAM recognition strategies for all CRISPR-Cas types. Available structures of target bound Cas protein effector complexes highlight the diversity of mechanisms and domain architectures that are employed to guarantee target specificity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references90

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          CRISPR–Cas9 Structures and Mechanisms

          Many bacterial clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)–CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems employ the dual RNA–guided DNA endonuclease Cas9 to defend against invading phages and conjugative plasmids by introducing site-specific double-stranded breaks in target DNA. Target recognition strictly requires the presence of a short protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) flanking the target site, and subsequent R-loop formation and strand scission are driven by complementary base pairing between the guide RNA and target DNA, Cas9–DNA interactions, and associated conformational changes. The use of CRISPR–Cas9 as an RNA-programmable DNA targeting and editing platform is simplified by a synthetic single-guide RNA (sgRNA) mimicking the natural dual trans-activating CRISPR RNA (tracrRNA)–CRISPR RNA (crRNA) structure. This review aims to provide an in-depth mechanistic and structural understanding of Cas9-mediated RNA-guided DNA targeting and cleavage. Molecular insights from biochemical and structural studies provide a framework for rational engineering aimed at altering catalytic function, guide RNA specificity, and PAM requirements and reducing off-target activity for the development of Cas9-based therapies against genetic diseases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Discovery and Functional Characterization of Diverse Class 2 CRISPR-Cas Systems.

            Microbial CRISPR-Cas systems are divided into Class 1, with multisubunit effector complexes, and Class 2, with single protein effectors. Currently, only two Class 2 effectors, Cas9 and Cpf1, are known. We describe here three distinct Class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems. The effectors of two of the identified systems, C2c1 and C2c3, contain RuvC-like endonuclease domains distantly related to Cpf1. The third system, C2c2, contains an effector with two predicted HEPN RNase domains. Whereas production of mature CRISPR RNA (crRNA) by C2c1 depends on tracrRNA, C2c2 crRNA maturation is tracrRNA independent. We found that C2c1 systems can mediate DNA interference in a 5'-PAM-dependent fashion analogous to Cpf1. However, unlike Cpf1, which is a single-RNA-guided nuclease, C2c1 depends on both crRNA and tracrRNA for DNA cleavage. Finally, comparative analysis indicates that Class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems evolved on multiple occasions through recombination of Class 1 adaptation modules with effector proteins acquired from distinct mobile elements.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Phage response to CRISPR-encoded resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus.

              Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and their associated genes are linked to a mechanism of acquired resistance against bacteriophages. Bacteria can integrate short stretches of phage-derived sequences (spacers) within CRISPR loci to become phage resistant. In this study, we further characterized the efficiency of CRISPR1 as a phage resistance mechanism in Streptococcus thermophilus. First, we show that CRISPR1 is distinct from previously known phage defense systems and is effective against the two main groups of S. thermophilus phages. Analyses of 30 bacteriophage-insensitive mutants of S. thermophilus indicate that the addition of one new spacer in CRISPR1 is the most frequent outcome of a phage challenge and that the iterative addition of spacers increases the overall phage resistance of the host. The added new spacers have a size of between 29 to 31 nucleotides, with 30 being by far the most frequent. Comparative analysis of 39 newly acquired spacers with the complete genomic sequences of the wild-type phages 2972, 858, and DT1 demonstrated that the newly added spacer must be identical to a region (named proto-spacer) in the phage genome to confer a phage resistance phenotype. Moreover, we found a CRISPR1-specific sequence (NNAGAAW) located downstream of the proto-spacer region that is important for the phage resistance phenotype. Finally, we show through the analyses of 20 mutant phages that virulent phages are rapidly evolving through single nucleotide mutations as well as deletions, in response to CRISPR1.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                RNA Biol
                RNA Biol
                KRNB
                krnb20
                RNA Biology
                Taylor & Francis
                1547-6286
                1555-8584
                April 2019
                18 September 2018
                18 September 2018
                : 16
                : 4
                : 504-517
                Affiliations
                [a ]Prokaryotic Small RNA Biology Group, Max-Planck-Institute for terrestrial Microbiology & LOEWE Center for synthetic Microbiology (Synmikro) , Marburg, Germany
                [b ]Philipps-University-Marburg, LOEWE Center for synthetic Microbiology (Synmikro) & Faculty of Chemistry , Marburg, Germany
                Author notes
                CONTACT Lennart Randau lennart.randau@ 123456mpi-marburg.mpg.de Prokaryotic Small RNA Biology Group, Max-Planck-Institute for terrestrial Microbiology & LOEWE Center for synthetic Microbiology (Synmikro) , 35043, Marburg, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2780-2076
                Article
                1504546
                10.1080/15476286.2018.1504546
                6546366
                30109815
                f3501c60-f407-4959-870f-c394dd614814
                © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 31 January 2018
                : 9 July 2018
                : 20 July 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 4, References: 148, Pages: 14
                Funding
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 10.13039/501100001659
                Award ID: FOR1680
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 10.13039/501100001659
                Award ID: FOR1680
                Funded by: DFG (FOR1680)
                Award ID: RA 2169/1-2
                This work was supported by the DFG (FOR1680) under Grant RA 2169/1-2; the LOEWE excellence initiative and the International Max-Planck-Research School for Environmental, Cellular, and Molecular Microbiology (IMPRS-Mic).Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [FOR1680].
                Categories
                Review

                Molecular biology
                crispr,cas proteins,dna recognition,pam,ribonucleoproteins
                Molecular biology
                crispr, cas proteins, dna recognition, pam, ribonucleoproteins

                Comments

                Comment on this article