27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Remifentanil–ketamine vs. propofol–ketamine for sedation in pediatric patients undergoing colonoscopy: A randomized clinical trial Translated title: Remifentanil–cetamina vs. propofol–cetamina para sedação em pacientes pediátricos submetidos à colonoscopia: ensaio clínico randômico

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and objectives

          Pediatric patients frequently require deep sedation or general anesthesia for colonoscopy. This study was designed to compare the sedative efficacy of remifentanil–ketamine combination with propofol–ketamine combination in children undergoing colonoscopy.

          Methods

          Seventy patients, between 2 and 16 years of age, scheduled for diagnostic colonoscopy were randomly allocated into two groups. Remifentanil–ketamine group received intravenous ketamine 2 mg.kg −1 and remifentanil 0.25 μg.kg −1 combination, followed by 0.1 μg.kg −1.min −1 remifentanil infusion. Propofol–ketamine group received intravenous propofol 1 and 2 mg.kg −1 ketamine combination, followed by 1 mg.kg −1.h −1 propofol infusion. In the case of children discomfort (cry, movement, and cough), remifentanil 0.1 μg.kg −1 in the remifentanil–ketamine group or propofol 0.5 mg.kg −1 in the propofol–ketamine group were administered to improve children discomfort. Despite the therapy given above, if children still experience discomfort, 1 mg.kg −1 of ketamine was administered as a rescue drug, regardless of the group. Ramsay sedation score, hemodynamic variables, drug requirements, gastroenterologists’ satisfaction, colonoscopy duration, recovery time, and side effects were recorded throughout the procedure and the recovery period.

          Results

          The percentage of patients with a Ramsay sedation score of 4 or higher during the procedure was 73.5 and 37.1% in remifentanil–ketamine and propofol–ketamine groups, respectively ( p = 0.02). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure variables were significantly higher only after induction in the remifentanil–ketamine group than in the propofol–ketamine group ( p = 0.015).

          Conclusion

          Coadministration of ketamine with either remifentanil or propofol effectively and safely provides sedation and analgesia in children undergoing colonoscopy. Sedation scores were significantly better in remifentanil–ketamine group than in propofol–ketamine group.

          Resumo

          Justificativa e objetivos

          Os pacientes pediátricos com frequência precisam de sedação profunda ou anestesia geral para colonoscopia. Este estudo foi desenhado para comparar a eficácia sedativa da combinação de remifentanil-cetamina e de propofol-cetamina em crianças submetidas à colonoscopia.

          Métodos

          Setenta pacientes, entre 2–16 anos de idade, programados para colonoscopia diagnóstica foram alocados randomicamente em dois grupos. O grupo remifentanil-cetamina recebeu a combinação de 2 mg.kg −1 de cetamina por via intravenosa e 0,25 μg.kg −1 de remifentanil; seguido de infusão de remifentanil (0,1 μg.kg −1.min −1). O grupo propofol-cetamina recebeu a combinação de 1 mg.kg −1 de propofol e 2 mg.kg −1 de cetamina; seguido de infusão de propofol (1 mg.kg −1.h −1). Em caso de desconforto das crianças (choro, movimento e tosse), remifentanil (0,1 μg.kg −1) seria administrado ao grupo remifentanil-cetamina ou propofol (0,5 mg.kg −1) ao grupo propofol-cetamina. A despeito da terapia acima citada, caso as crianças ainda sentissem desconforto, cetamina (1 mg.kg −1) seria administrada como fármaco de resgate, independente do grupo. Escore de sedação de Ramsay, variáveis hemodinâmicas, necessidade de medicamentos, satisfação dos gastroenterologistas, duração da colonoscopia, tempo de recuperação e efeitos colaterais foram registrados durante o procedimento e o período de recuperação.

          Resultados

          O percentual de pacientes com escore 4 ou mais na escala de sedação de Ramsay durante o procedimento foi de 73,5% e 37,1% nos grupos remifentanil-cetamina e propofol-cetamina, respectivamente, ( p = 0,02). As variáveis, pressão arterial sistólica e diastólica, foram significativamente maiores no grupo remifentanil-cetamina do que no grupo propofol-cetamina, mas somente após a indução ( p = 0,015).

          Conclusão

          A coadministração de cetamina com remifentanil ou propofol fornece sedação e analgesia de forma eficaz e segura em crianças submetidas à colonoscopia. Os escores de sedação foram significativamente melhores no grupo remifentanil-cetamina que no grupo propofol-cetamina.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlled Sedation with Alphaxalone-Alphadolone

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Ketamine--its pharmacology and therapeutic uses.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Ketamine—Its Pharmacology and Therapeutic Uses

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Braz J Anesthesiol
                Braz J Anesthesiol
                Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
                Elsevier
                0104-0014
                2352-2291
                11 August 2018
                Nov-Dec 2018
                11 August 2018
                : 68
                : 6
                : 597-604
                Affiliations
                [a ]Çukurova University Medical Faculty, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Adana, Turkey
                [b ]Numune Training and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Adana, Turkey
                [c ]Şanlıurfa Training and Research Hospital, Pediatric Gastroenterology Department, Şanlıurfa, Turkey
                [d ]Çukurova University Medical Faculty, Pediatric Gastroenterology Department, Adana, Turkey
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. feridekaracaer@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S0104-0014(18)30107-6
                10.1016/j.bjane.2018.06.010
                9391731
                30205906
                f2ccf213-91c8-4b2e-bbd7-e3e806513f7f
                © 2018 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 3 July 2017
                : 22 June 2018
                Categories
                Scientific Article

                outpatient,remifentanil,ketamine,propofol,children,colonoscopy,paciente ambulatorial,cetamina,crianças,colonoscopia

                Comments

                Comment on this article