27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Tree carbon allocation explains forest drought-kill and recovery patterns

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Temperature as a potent driver of regional forest drought stress and tree mortality

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            MORE EFFICIENT PLANTS: A Consequence of Rising Atmospheric CO2?

            The primary effect of the response of plants to rising atmospheric CO2 (Ca) is to increase resource use efficiency. Elevated Ca reduces stomatal conductance and transpiration and improves water use efficiency, and at the same time it stimulates higher rates of photosynthesis and increases light-use efficiency. Acclimation of photosynthesis during long-term exposure to elevated Ca reduces key enzymes of the photosynthetic carbon reduction cycle, and this increases nutrient use efficiency. Improved soil-water balance, increased carbon uptake in the shade, greater carbon to nitrogen ratio, and reduced nutrient quality for insect and animal grazers are all possibilities that have been observed in field studies of the effects of elevated Ca. These effects have major consequences for agriculture and native ecosystems in a world of rising atmospheric Ca and climate change.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A multi-species synthesis of physiological mechanisms in drought-induced tree mortality

              Widespread tree mortality associated with drought has been observed on all forested continents and global change is expected to exacerbate vegetation vulnerability. Forest mortality has implications for future biosphere-atmosphere interactions of carbon, water and energy balance, and is poorly represented in dynamic vegetation models. Reducing uncertainty requires improved mortality projections founded on robust physiological processes. However, the proposed mechanisms of drought-induced mortality, including hydraulic failure and carbon starvation, are unresolved. A growing number of empirical studies have investigated these mechanisms, but data have not been consistently analysed across species and biomes using a standardized physiological framework. Here, we show that xylem hydraulic failure was ubiquitous across multiple tree taxa at drought-induced mortality. All species assessed had 60% or higher loss of xylem hydraulic conductivity, consistent with proposed theoretical and modelled survival thresholds. We found diverse responses in non-structural carbohydrate reserves at mortality, indicating that evidence supporting carbon starvation was not universal. Reduced non-structural carbohydrates were more common for gymnosperms than angiosperms, associated with xylem hydraulic vulnerability, and may have a role in reducing hydraulic function. Our finding that hydraulic failure at drought-induced mortality was persistent across species indicates that substantial improvement in vegetation modelling can be achieved using thresholds in hydraulic function.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ecology Letters
                Ecol Lett
                Wiley
                1461023X
                August 19 2018
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biology; University of Utah; Salt Lake City UT 84112 USA
                [2 ]Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology; Princeton University; Princeton NJ 08544 USA
                [3 ]Department of Biological Sciences; University of Notre Dame; Notre Dame IN 46556 USA
                [4 ]Center for Ecosystem Science and Society; Northern Arizona University; Flagstaff AZ 86001 USA
                [5 ]Woods Hole Research Center; Falmouth MA 02540 USA
                [6 ]Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering; Princeton University; Princeton NJ 08544 USA
                Article
                10.1111/ele.13136
                30125446
                f252e1d7-3c45-496e-bcc4-bc42c9af8713
                © 2018

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article