4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multiple forms of working memory emerge from synapse–astrocyte interactions in a neuron–glia network model

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          The biophysical underpinnings of working memory are of paramount interest in modern neuroscience. Working memory could be encoded by diverse patterns of neural activity, ranging from persistent firing of neuronal populations to more dynamic patterns of network activity. Silent mechanisms whereby working memory is maintained by synaptic variables have also been suggested. Multiple models exist for these mechanisms but only consider neurons, ignoring glia. We propose that glia could underpin working memory, introducing models of cortical neuron–glial networks where synapse–glia signaling could account for firing and silent working memory encoding. Our theoretical arguments can explain emerging accounts of the variegated nature of working memory encoding and the possible contribution of glia to it.

          Abstract

          Persistent activity in populations of neurons, time-varying activity across a neural population, or activity-silent mechanisms carried out by hidden internal states of the neural population have been proposed as different mechanisms of working memory (WM). Whether these mechanisms could be mutually exclusive or occur in the same neuronal circuit remains, however, elusive, and so do their biophysical underpinnings. While WM is traditionally regarded to depend purely on neuronal mechanisms, cortical networks also include astrocytes that can modulate neural activity. We propose and investigate a network model that includes both neurons and glia and show that glia–synapse interactions can lead to multiple stable states of synaptic transmission. Depending on parameters, these interactions can lead in turn to distinct patterns of network activity that can serve as substrates for WM.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Diversity of astrocyte functions and phenotypes in neural circuits.

          Astrocytes tile the entire CNS. They are vital for neural circuit function, but have traditionally been viewed as simple, homogenous cells that serve the same essential supportive roles everywhere. Here, we summarize breakthroughs that instead indicate that astrocytes represent a population of complex and functionally diverse cells. Physiological diversity of astrocytes is apparent between different brain circuits and microcircuits, and individual astrocytes display diverse signaling in subcellular compartments. With respect to injury and disease, astrocytes undergo diverse phenotypic changes that may be protective or causative with regard to pathology in a context-dependent manner. These new insights herald the concept that astrocytes represent a diverse population of genetically tractable cells that mediate neural circuit-specific roles in health and disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dynamics of sparsely connected networks of excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons.

            N Brunel (2000)
            The dynamics of networks of sparsely connected excitatory and inhibitory integrate-and-fire neurons are studied analytically. The analysis reveals a rich repertoire of states, including synchronous states in which neurons fire regularly; asynchronous states with stationary global activity and very irregular individual cell activity; and states in which the global activity oscillates but individual cells fire irregularly, typically at rates lower than the global oscillation frequency. The network can switch between these states, provided the external frequency, or the balance between excitation and inhibition, is varied. Two types of network oscillations are observed. In the fast oscillatory state, the network frequency is almost fully controlled by the synaptic time scale. In the slow oscillatory state, the network frequency depends mostly on the membrane time constant. Finite size effects in the asynchronous state are also discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Synaptic theory of working memory.

              It is usually assumed that enhanced spiking activity in the form of persistent reverberation for several seconds is the neural correlate of working memory. Here, we propose that working memory is sustained by calcium-mediated synaptic facilitation in the recurrent connections of neocortical networks. In this account, the presynaptic residual calcium is used as a buffer that is loaded, refreshed, and read out by spiking activity. Because of the long time constants of calcium kinetics, the refresh rate can be low, resulting in a mechanism that is metabolically efficient and robust. The duration and stability of working memory can be regulated by modulating the spontaneous activity in the network.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                18 October 2022
                25 October 2022
                18 April 2023
                : 119
                : 43
                : e2207912119
                Affiliations
                [1] aKrembil Research Institute, University Health Network , Toronto, ON, M5T 0S8, Canada;
                [2] bTemerty Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada;
                [3] cDivision of Mathematical Modeling with Multidisciplinary Applications, Basque Center for Applied Mathematics , 48009 Bilbao, Spain;
                [4] dFaculty of Medicine, University of the Basque Country , 48940 Leioa, Spain;
                [5] eDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University , Durham, NC 27710;
                [6] fDepartment of Physics, Duke University , Durham, NC 27710
                Author notes
                1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: maurizio.depitta@ 123456uhnresearch.ca .

                Edited by Terrence Sejnowski, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA; received May 10, 2022; accepted August 11, 2022

                Author contributions: M.D.P. and N.B. designed research; M.D.P. performed research; M.D.P. and N.B. analyzed data; and M.D.P. and N.B. wrote the paper.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5799-5182
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2272-3248
                Article
                202207912
                10.1073/pnas.2207912119
                9618090
                36256810
                f1348836-2439-4411-98c2-6ea77946ba22
                Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

                History
                : 11 August 2022
                Page count
                Pages: 0000
                Funding
                Funded by: EC | Horizon Europe | Excellent Science | HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) 100018694
                Award ID: 331486
                Award Recipient : Maurizio De Pitta Award Recipient : Nicolas Brunel
                Categories
                424
                Biological Sciences
                Neuroscience

                neuron–glial networks,working memory,gliotransmission,spiking neuron and astrocyte models

                Comments

                Comment on this article