5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for traumatic dental injuries

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background/Aims

          Traumatic dental injuries (TDI) are considered a public health problem due to their high prevalence and associated physical, economic, psychological and social consequences. Hence, good Clinical Practice Guidelines are essential to achieving a favourable prognosis. The aim of this review was to appraise the existing Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) on TDI using AGREE II and AGREE‐REX.

          Materials and Methods

          A systematic search for existing guidelines on TDI was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, National Institute for Health Care Excellence, BMJ Best Practice, Trip database, Guideline International Network, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, World Health Organisation, Web of Science and ‘Ministry of Health worldwide’ databases. Four appraisers independently appraised the included CPGs. The AGREE II tool was applied to assess the methodological quality, while AGREE REX assessed the quality of recommendations of the included guidelines.

          Results

          Of the 7736 titles screened, three guidelines, namely the International Association of Dental Traumatology Guidelines (IADT), and the Italian and Malaysian guidelines, were included for the final analysis. These guidelines were published between 2019 and 2020. The AGREE II analysis demonstrated scores above 80% for the IADT and Italian guidelines for the scope and purpose domain. Overall, the Malaysian guidelines achieved the highest score for all domains. The AGREE REX analysis indicated variability in implementation across the nine items, with five that scored above the midpoint of 4.0 on the response scale. Both the Italian and the IADT guidelines had a similar score for the values and preference domains (36.36%).

          Conclusions

          Several deficiencies exist in the methodological quality of existing CPGs on TDI. Future guidelines should consider improvements for domains such as ‘rigour of development’, ‘stakeholder involvement’ and ‘applicability’ to overcome the existing limitations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The AGREE Reporting Checklist: a tool to improve reporting of clinical practice guidelines

            AGREE II is a widely used standard for assessing the methodological quality of practice guidelines. This article describes the development of the AGREE Reporting Checklist, which was designed to improve the quality of practice guideline reporting and aligns with AGREE II in its structure and content.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise.

              Although several tools to evaluate the credibility of health care guidelines exist, guidance on practical steps for developing guidelines is lacking. We systematically compiled a comprehensive checklist of items linked to relevant resources and tools that guideline developers could consider, without the expectation that every guideline would address each item. We searched data sources, including manuals of international guideline developers, literature on guidelines for guidelines (with a focus on methodology reports from international and national agencies, and professional societies) and recent articles providing systematic guidance. We reviewed these sources in duplicate, extracted items for the checklist using a sensitive approach and developed overarching topics relevant to guidelines. In an iterative process, we reviewed items for duplication and omissions and involved experts in guideline development for revisions and suggestions for items to be added. We developed a checklist with 18 topics and 146 items and a webpage to facilitate its use by guideline developers. The topics and included items cover all stages of the guideline enterprise, from the planning and formulation of guidelines, to their implementation and evaluation. The final checklist includes links to training materials as well as resources with suggested methodology for applying the items. The checklist will serve as a resource for guideline developers. Consideration of items on the checklist will support the development, implementation and evaluation of guidelines. We will use crowdsourcing to revise the checklist and keep it up to date.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Dental Traumatology
                Dental Traumatology
                Wiley
                1600-4469
                1600-9657
                August 2023
                April 2023
                August 2023
                : 39
                : 4
                : 371-380
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Ramachandra Faculty of Dental Sciences, Centre for Early Childhood Caries Research (CECCRe) Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER) Porur Chennai 600116 India
                [2 ] Centre of Medical and Bio‐Allied Health Sciences Research Ajman University Ajman United Arab Emirates
                [3 ] Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Sri Ramachandra Faculty of Dental Sciences Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU) Porur Chennai 600116 India
                [4 ] Department of Periodontology, Sri Ramachandra Faculty of Dental Sciences Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research Porur Chennai 600116 India
                [5 ] Specialist Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon Dentacare Centre Abudhabi United Arab Emirates
                [6 ] Dental School, Oral Developmental and Behavioural Sciences The University of Western Australia Sterling Highway Perth Western Australia Australia
                [7 ] College of Dentistry Ajman University Ajman United Arab Emirates
                [8 ] Centre of Medical and Bio‐allied Health Science Research (CMBHSR), College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (COPHS) Ajman University Ajman United Arab Emirates
                Article
                10.1111/edt.12838
                36920339
                f097c2d0-3fc0-4b22-b355-f5b8f59bae21
                © 2023

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article