33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Canakinumab as Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Completely Resected Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results From the CANOPY-A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Adjuvant canakinumab did not increase disease-free survival in resected non–small-cell lung cancer.

          Abstract

          PURPOSE

          Effective treatments for resectable non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are limited and relapse rates are high. The interleukin (IL)-1β pathway has been linked with tumor development and progression, including in the Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes cardiovascular study in which IL-1β pathway inhibition with canakinumab reduced lung cancer incidence and mortality in an exploratory analysis.

          METHODS

          CANOPY-A (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03447769 ) is a phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of canakinumab versus placebo for adult patients with stage II-IIIA or IIIB (T >5 cm, N2-positives II-IIIB; American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control version 8), completely resected NSCLC who had received adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS) and the key secondary end point was overall survival (OS).

          RESULTS

          In total, 1,382 patients were randomized to 200 mg canakinumab (n = 693) or placebo (n = 689) once every 3 weeks for 18 cycles. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 20.8% and 19.6% of patients receiving canakinumab and placebo, respectively; AEs led to discontinuation in 4.3% and 4.1% of patients in these groups, respectively. This study did not meet its primary end point. Median DFS was 35.0 months (canakinumab arm) and 29.7 months (placebo arm; hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.14; one-sided P = .258). DFS subgroup analyses did not show any meaningful differences between arms. As expected, because of canakinumab-driven IL-1β pathway inhibition, C-reactive protein and IL-6 levels decreased in the canakinumab arm versus placebo arm, but had no correlation with differential clinical outcomes. OS was not formally tested as DFS was not statistically significant.

          CONCLUSION

          CANOPY-A did not show a DFS benefit of adding canakinumab after surgery and adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with resected, stage II-III NSCLC. No new safety signals were identified with canakinumab.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries

          This article provides an update on the global cancer burden using the GLOBOCAN 2020 estimates of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Worldwide, an estimated 19.3 million new cancer cases (18.1 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) and almost 10.0 million cancer deaths (9.9 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) occurred in 2020. Female breast cancer has surpassed lung cancer as the most commonly diagnosed cancer, with an estimated 2.3 million new cases (11.7%), followed by lung (11.4%), colorectal (10.0 %), prostate (7.3%), and stomach (5.6%) cancers. Lung cancer remained the leading cause of cancer death, with an estimated 1.8 million deaths (18%), followed by colorectal (9.4%), liver (8.3%), stomach (7.7%), and female breast (6.9%) cancers. Overall incidence was from 2-fold to 3-fold higher in transitioned versus transitioning countries for both sexes, whereas mortality varied <2-fold for men and little for women. Death rates for female breast and cervical cancers, however, were considerably higher in transitioning versus transitioned countries (15.0 vs 12.8 per 100,000 and 12.4 vs 5.2 per 100,000, respectively). The global cancer burden is expected to be 28.4 million cases in 2040, a 47% rise from 2020, with a larger increase in transitioning (64% to 95%) versus transitioned (32% to 56%) countries due to demographic changes, although this may be further exacerbated by increasing risk factors associated with globalization and a growing economy. Efforts to build a sustainable infrastructure for the dissemination of cancer prevention measures and provision of cancer care in transitioning countries is critical for global cancer control.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Osimertinib in Resected EGFR-Mutated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

            Osimertinib is standard-of-care therapy for previously untreated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The efficacy and safety of osimertinib as adjuvant therapy are unknown.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation: a pooled analysis by the LACE Collaborative Group.

              Several recent trials have shown a significant overall survival (OS) benefit from postoperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of the Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation was to identify treatment options associated with a higher benefit or groups of patients who particularly benefit from postoperative chemotherapy. Individual patient data were collected and pooled from the five largest trials (4,584 patients) of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in completely resected patients that were conducted after the 1995 NSCLC meta-analysis. The interactions between patient subgroups or treatment types and chemotherapy effect on OS were analyzed using hazard ratios (HRs) and log-rank tests stratified by trial. With a median follow-up time of 5.2 years, the overall HR of death was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.82 to 0.96; P = .005), corresponding to a 5-year absolute benefit of 5.4% from chemotherapy. There was no heterogeneity of chemotherapy effect among trials. The benefit varied with stage (test for trend, P = .04; HR for stage IA = 1.40; 95% CI, 0.95 to 2.06; HR for stage IB = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.10; HR for stage II = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.95; and HR for stage III = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.94). The effect of chemotherapy did not vary significantly (test for interaction, P = .11) with the associated drugs, including vinorelbine (HR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.91), etoposide or vinca alkaloid (HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.07), or other (HR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.13). Chemotherapy effect was higher in patients with better performance status. There was no interaction between chemotherapy effect and sex, age, histology, type of surgery, planned radiotherapy, or planned total dose of cisplatin. Postoperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy significantly improves survival in patients with NSCLC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Journal of Clinical Oncology
                JCO
                0732-183X
                1527-7755
                January 10 2024
                January 10 2024
                : 42
                : 2
                : 180-191
                Affiliations
                [1 ]David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA/TRIO-US/TRIO-Global Network, Los Angeles, CA
                [2 ]Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
                [3 ]National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
                [4 ]Oncoclinicas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
                [5 ]University Hospital 12 de Octubre, CNIO-H120 Lung Cancer Unit, Completense University and Ciberonc, Madrid, Spain
                [6 ]Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN
                [7 ]Thoraxklinik and National Center for Tumor Diseases at Heidelberg University Hospital, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRH-C), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
                [8 ]National Taiwan University Cancer Center and National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
                [9 ]IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
                [10 ]Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
                [11 ]Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris-Saclay, Bicêtre, France
                [12 ]Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
                [13 ]Department of Thoracic Oncology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan
                [14 ]Fourth Oncology Department and Clinical Trials Unit, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece
                [15 ]Novartis Pharma S.A.S, Rueil-Malmaison, France
                [16 ]Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
                [17 ]Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ
                [18 ]Division of Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                Article
                10.1200/JCO.23.00910
                37788412
                eeaff291-a2d4-4ced-b227-d5d54c614d73
                © 2024
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content309

                Cited by14

                Most referenced authors718