Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
42
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Spray‐induced gene silencing for disease control is dependent on the efficiency of pathogen RNA uptake

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Recent discoveries show that fungi can take up environmental RNA, which can then silence fungal genes through environmental RNA interference. This discovery prompted the development of Spray‐Induced Gene Silencing (SIGS) for plant disease management. In this study, we aimed to determine the efficacy of SIGS across a variety of eukaryotic microbes. We first examined the efficiency of RNA uptake in multiple pathogenic and non‐pathogenic fungi, and an oomycete pathogen. We observed efficient double‐stranded RNA (dsRNA) uptake in the fungal plant pathogens Botrytis cinerea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Rhizoctonia solani, Aspergillus niger and Verticillium dahliae, but no uptake in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, and weak uptake in a beneficial fungus, Trichoderma virens. For the oomycete plant pathogen, Phytophthora infestans, RNA uptake was limited and varied across different cell types and developmental stages. Topical application of dsRNA targeting virulence‐related genes in pathogens with high RNA uptake efficiency significantly inhibited plant disease symptoms, whereas the application of dsRNA in pathogens with low RNA uptake efficiency did not suppress infection. Our results have revealed that dsRNA uptake efficiencies vary across eukaryotic microbe species and cell types. The success of SIGS for plant disease management can largely be determined by the pathogen’s RNA uptake efficiency.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Control of coleopteran insect pests through RNA interference.

          Commercial biotechnology solutions for controlling lepidopteran and coleopteran insect pests on crops depend on the expression of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal proteins, most of which permeabilize the membranes of gut epithelial cells of susceptible insects. However, insect control strategies involving a different mode of action would be valuable for managing the emergence of insect resistance. Toward this end, we demonstrate that ingestion of double-stranded (ds)RNAs supplied in an artificial diet triggers RNA interference in several coleopteran species, most notably the western corn rootworm (WCR) Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte. This may result in larval stunting and mortality. Transgenic corn plants engineered to express WCR dsRNAs show a significant reduction in WCR feeding damage in a growth chamber assay, suggesting that the RNAi pathway can be exploited to control insect pests via in planta expression of a dsRNA.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Fungal small RNAs suppress plant immunity by hijacking host RNA interference pathways.

            Botrytis cinerea, the causative agent of gray mold disease, is an aggressive fungal pathogen that infects more than 200 plant species. Here, we show that some B. cinerea small RNAs (Bc-sRNAs) can silence Arabidopsis and tomato genes involved in immunity. These Bc-sRNAs hijack the host RNA interference (RNAi) machinery by binding to Arabidopsis Argonaute 1 (AGO1) and selectively silencing host immunity genes. The Arabidopsis ago1 mutant exhibits reduced susceptibility to B. cinerea, and the B. cinerea dcl1 dcl2 double mutant that can no longer produce these Bc-sRNAs displays reduced pathogenicity on Arabidopsis and tomato. Thus, this fungal pathogen transfers "virulent" sRNA effectors into host plant cells to suppress host immunity and achieve infection, which demonstrates a naturally occurring cross-kingdom RNAi as an advanced virulence mechanism.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Plants send small RNAs in extracellular vesicles to fungal pathogen to silence virulence genes

              Some pathogens and pests deliver small RNAs (sRNAs) into host cells to suppress host immunity. Conversely, hosts also transfer sRNAs into pathogens and pests to inhibit their virulence. Although sRNA trafficking has been observed in a wide variety of interactions, how sRNAs are transferred, especially from hosts to pathogens/pests, is still unknown. Here we show that host Arabidopsis cells secrete exosome-like extracellular vesicles to deliver sRNAs into fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea. These sRNA-containing vesicles accumulate at the infection sites and are taken up by the fungal cells. Transferred host sRNAs induce silencing of fungal genes critical for pathogenicity. Thus, Arabidopsis has adapted exosome-mediated cross-kingdom RNA interference as part of its immune responses during the evolutionary arms race with the pathogen.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ddniu@njau.edu.cn
                hailingj@ucr.edu
                Journal
                Plant Biotechnol J
                Plant Biotechnol J
                10.1111/(ISSN)1467-7652
                PBI
                Plant Biotechnology Journal
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1467-7644
                1467-7652
                04 May 2021
                September 2021
                : 19
                : 9 ( doiID: 10.1111/pbi.v19.9 )
                : 1756-1768
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] College of Plant Protection Nanjing Agricultural University Nanjing China
                [ 2 ] Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests (Ministry of Education) Nanjing China
                [ 3 ] Department of Microbiology & Plant Pathology Center for Plant Cell Biology Institute for Integrative Genome Biology University of California Riverside CA USA
                [ 4 ] Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences Marche Polytechnic University Ancona Italy
                [ 5 ] Department of Plant and Microbial Biology University of California Berkeley CA USA
                [ 6 ] Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division The Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley CA USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] * Correspondence (Tel 86‐25‐84399093; fax 86‐25‐84395425; email ddniu@ 123456njau.edu.cn ) and (Tel 951‐827‐7995; fax 951‐827‐4294; email hailingj@ 123456ucr.edu )

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9107-765X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9926-0923
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5778-5193
                Article
                PBI13589
                10.1111/pbi.13589
                8428832
                33774895
                edfb20e8-08cf-40e5-bab0-fd3809312a00
                © 2021 The Authors. Plant Biotechnology Journal published by Society for Experimental Biology and The Association of Applied Biologists and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 01 March 2021
                : 08 December 2020
                : 06 March 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 0, Pages: 13, Words: 9489
                Funding
                Funded by: National Science Foundation , doi 10.13039/100000001;
                Award ID: DBI‐1922642
                Award ID: IOS‐1557812
                Award ID: IOS‐2017314
                Funded by: National Institute of Health
                Award ID: R01 GM093008
                Award ID: R35 GM136379‐01
                Funded by: United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture
                Award ID: 2021‐67013‐34258
                Funded by: Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Research Hub
                Award ID: IH190100022
                Funded by: Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund of China
                Award ID: CX(19)3103
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.7 mode:remove_FC converted:09.09.2021

                Biotechnology
                spray‐induced gene silencing,small rna,rna interference,double‐stranded rna,uptake efficiency

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content148

                Cited by85

                Most referenced authors901