For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
Inviting an author to review:
Myopic shift in a pseudophakic eye with an accommodating IOL following vitrectomy with gas tamponade
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
1
views
Article has an altmetric score of 4
23
references
 Top references
cited by
8
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      2,371
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Exploring the potential of ChatGPT in the peer review process: An observational study

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" class="first" dir="auto" id="d4223959e166">Peer review is the established method for evaluating the quality and validity of research manuscripts in scholarly publishing. However, scientific peer review faces challenges as the volume of submitted research has steadily increased in recent years. Time constraints and peer review quality assurance can place burdens on reviewers, potentially discouraging their participation. Some artificial intelligence (AI) tools might assist in relieving these pressures. This study explores the efficiency and effectiveness of one of the artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, ChatGPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer), in the peer review process. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.

          Terry Koo, Mae Li (2016)
          Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) is a widely used reliability index in test-retest, intrarater, and interrater reliability analyses. This article introduces the basic concept of ICC in the content of reliability analysis.
          Article 0 comments Cited 6527 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
          Article has an altmetric score of 96
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            ChatGPT: five priorities for research

            Eva A. M. van Dis, Johan Bollen, Willem  Zuidema … (2023)
            Article 0 comments Cited 386 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Article has an altmetric score of 619
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              ChatGPT is fun, but not an author

              H. Holden Thorp (2023)
              In less than 2 months, the artificial intelligence (AI) program ChatGPT has become a cultural sensation. It is freely accessible through a web portal created by the tool’s developer, OpenAI. The program—which automatically creates text based on written prompts—is so popular that it’s likely to be “at capacity right now” if you attempt to use it. When you do get through, ChatGPT provides endless entertainment. I asked it to rewrite the first scene of the classic American play Death of a Salesman , but to feature Princess Elsa from the animated movie Frozen as the main character instead of Willy Loman. The output was an amusing conversation in which Elsa—who has come home from a tough day of selling—is told by her son Happy, “Come on, Mom. You’re Elsa from Frozen . You have ice powers and you’re a queen. You’re unstoppable.” Mash-ups like this are certainly fun, but there are serious implications for generative AI programs like ChatGPT in science and academia.
              Article 0 comments Cited 341 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Article has an altmetric score of 860
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Title: Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews
                Abbreviated Title: Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews
                Publisher: Elsevier BV
                ISSN (Print): 18714021
                Publication date Created: February 2024
                Publication date (Print): February 2024
                Volume: 18
                Issue: 2
                Page: 102946
                Article
                DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2024.102946
                PubMed ID: 38330745
                SO-VID: ed31c52e-498f-4bf6-bdbf-758e5f0e210e
                Copyright © © 2024
                License:

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Data availability:

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content2,371

                See all similar

                Cited by8

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors103

                See all reference authors