10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multisite Radiotherapy Combined With Tislelizumab for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With Second-Line and Above Therapy Failure: Study Protocol for an Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase Ib/II Study

      methods-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Tislelizumab combined with radiotherapy as a salvage treatment for patients with end-stage metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is not reported. This study aimed to describe a protocol to evaluate the safety and efficacy of multisite radiotherapy combined with tislelizumab as a salvage therapy for mCRPC in patients who had at least one second-line treatment failure.

          Methods

          The study included patients with mCRPC who had at least one lesion suitable for radiotherapy and failed androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), followed by at least one novel second-line endocrine therapy. All patients received tislelizumab monotherapy induction therapy for two cycles, then combined with multisite radiotherapy for one cycle, followed by tislelizumab maintenance therapy, until either disease progressed or the patient developed unacceptable toxicity. Radiation methods and lesions were individually selected according to the specified protocol. Primary endpoints included safety and objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, disease control rate, overall survival, radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS). Furthermore, the exploratory endpoints included the identification of the predictive biomarkers and exploration of the correlation between biomarkers and the tumor response to the combined regimen.

          Discussion

          This study included three treatment stages to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy and the combination of immunotherapy and radiotherapy for patients with mCRPC who have had at least second-line treatment failure. Additionally, radiation-related and immune-related early and late toxicities were determined, respectively. Furthermore, the study also aimed to identify the predictive biomarkers associated with immunotherapy for treating mCRPC.

          Trial Registration

          https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=126359, identifier ChiCTR2100046212.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Tumor Mutational Burden and Response Rate to PD-1 Inhibition

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Noncolorectal High Microsatellite Instability/Mismatch Repair–Deficient Cancer: Results From the Phase II KEYNOTE-158 Study

            Genomes of tumors that are deficient in DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) have high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and harbor hundreds to thousands of somatic mutations that encode potential neoantigens. Such tumors are therefore likely to be immunogenic, triggering upregulation of immune checkpoint proteins. Pembrolizumab, an anti‒programmed death-1 monoclonal antibody, has antitumor activity against MSI-H/dMMR cancer. We report data from the phase II KEYNOTE-158 study of pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated, advanced noncolorectal MSI-H/dMMR cancer. Eligible patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed MSI-H/dMMR advanced noncolorectal cancer who experienced failure with prior therapy received pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks for 2 years or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. Radiologic imaging was performed every 9 weeks for the first year of therapy and every 12 weeks thereafter. The primary end point was objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, as assessed by independent central radiologic review. Among 233 enrolled patients, 27 tumor types were represented, with endometrial, gastric, cholangiocarcinoma, and pancreatic cancers being the most common. Median follow up was 13.4 months. Objective response rate was 34.3% (95% CI, 28.3% to 40.8%). Median progression-free survival was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.4 to 4.9 months) and median overall survival was 23.5 months (95% CI, 13.5 months to not reached). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 151 patients (64.8%). Thirty-four patients (14.6%) had grade 3 to 5 treatment-related adverse events. Grade 5 pneumonia occurred in one patient; there were no other treatment-related fatal adverse events. Our study demonstrates the clinical benefit of anti–programmed death-1 therapy with pembrolizumab among patients with previously treated unresectable or metastatic MSI-H/dMMR noncolorectal cancer. Toxicity was consistent with previous experience of pembrolizumab monotherapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Overall Survival with Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III NSCLC

              An earlier analysis in this phase 3 trial showed that durvalumab significantly prolonged progression-free survival, as compared with placebo, among patients with stage III, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who did not have disease progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Here we report the results for the second primary end point of overall survival.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                07 July 2022
                2022
                : 12
                : 888707
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Abdominal Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University , Chengdu, China
                [2] 2 State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University , Chengdu, China
                [3] 3 West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University , Chengdu, China
                [4] 4 West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University , Chengdu, China
                [5] 5 Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy and Adverse Drug Reaction, West China Hospital, Sichuan University , Chengdu, China
                [6] 6 Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University , Chengdu, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Constantinos Zamboglou, German Oncology Center, Cyprus

                Reviewed by: August Sigle, University of Freiburg, Germany; Urban Emmenegger, Sunnybrook Research Institute (SRI), Canada; Panagiotis J. Vlachostergios, Cornell University, United States

                *Correspondence: Zhiping Li, lizhiping620312@ 123456163.com

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

                This article was submitted to Genitourinary Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2022.888707
                9300836
                35875078
                ecffc1fe-b258-44ba-9703-91ad321c2f23
                Copyright © 2022 Cheng, Wang, Chen, Zhu, Qi, Wang, Zou, Lu and Li

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 03 March 2022
                : 10 June 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 61, Pages: 12, Words: 6576
                Categories
                Oncology
                Methods

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mcrpc),tislelizumab,pd-1 monoclonal antibodies,combination therapy,study protocol,multisite radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article