131
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Information about the incidence of induced abortion is needed to motivate and inform efforts to help women avoid unintended pregnancies and to monitor progress toward that end. We estimate subregional, regional, and global levels and trends in abortion incidence for 1990 to 2014, and abortion rates in subgroups of women. We use the results to estimate the proportion of pregnancies that end in abortion and examine whether abortion rates vary in countries grouped by the legal status of abortion.

          Methods

          We requested abortion data from government agencies and compiled data from international sources and nationally representative studies. With data for 1069 country-years, we estimated incidence using a Bayesian hierarchical time series model whereby the overall abortion rate is a function of the modelled rates in subgroups of women of reproductive age defined by their marital status and contraceptive need and use, and the sizes of these subgroups.

          Findings

          We estimated that 35 abortions (90% uncertainty interval [UI] 33 to 44) occurred annually per 1000 women aged 15–44 years worldwide in 2010–14, which was 5 points less than 40 (39–48) in 1990–94 (90% UI for decline −11 to 0). Because of population growth, the annual number of abortions worldwide increased by 5·9 million (90% UI −1·3 to 15·4), from 50·4 million in 1990–94 (48·6 to 59·9) to 56·3 million (52·4 to 70·0) in 2010–14. In the developed world, the abortion rate declined 19 points (–26 to −14), from 46 (41 to 59) to 27 (24 to 37). In the developing world, we found a non-significant 2 point decline (90% UI −9 to 4) in the rate from 39 (37 to 47) to 37 (34 to 46). Some 25% (90% UI 23 to 29) of pregnancies ended in abortion in 2010–14. Globally, 73% (90% UI 59 to 82) of abortions were obtained by married women in 2010–14 compared with 27% (18 to 41) obtained by unmarried women. We did not observe an association between the abortion rates for 2010–14 and the grounds under which abortion is legally allowed.

          Interpretation

          Abortion rates have declined significantly since 1990 in the developed world but not in the developing world. Ensuring access to sexual and reproductive health care could help millions of women avoid unintended pregnancies and ensure access to safe abortion.

          Funding

          UK Government, Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation, The David and Lucile Packard Foundation, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          2985213R
          5470
          Lancet
          Lancet
          Lancet (London, England)
          0140-6736
          1474-547X
          11 April 2017
          11 May 2016
          16 July 2016
          06 July 2017
          : 388
          : 10041
          : 258-267
          Affiliations
          Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA (G Sedgh ScD, J Bearak PhD, S Singh PhD, A Bankole PhD, A Popinchalk MPH); Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland (B Ganatra MD, Ö Tunçalp MD, B R Johnson Jr PhD); University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland (C Rossier PhD); Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA, USA (C Gerdts PhD); Independent Consultant, Geneva, Switzerland (H B Johnston PhD); and University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA (L Alkema PhD)
          Author notes
          Correspondence to: Dr Gilda Sedgh, Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY 10038, USA gsedgh@ 123456guttmacher.org
          Article
          PMC5498988 PMC5498988 5498988 nihpa863976
          10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30380-4
          5498988
          27179755
          ecf5fbe5-0a14-46a2-a302-7b0b62076f00
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article