26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Motivation States for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior: Desire, Urge, Wanting, and Craving

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To better explain daily fluctuations in physical activity and sedentary behavior, investigations of motivation are turning from social cognitive frameworks to those centered on affect, emotion and automaticity, such as the Affect and Health Behavior Framework (AHBF), Integrated Framework and Affective-Reflective Theory (ART). This shift has necessitated: (a) re-examination of older theories and their constructs, such as drives, needs and tensions and (b) an inspection of competing theories from other fields that also attempt to explain dynamic changes in health behaviors. The Dynamical Model of Desire, Elaborated Intrusion Theory and others commonly share with AHBF the idea that human behavior is driven strongly by desires and/or the similar concepts of wants, urges, and cravings. These affectively-charged motivation states (ACMS) change quickly and may better explain physical activity behavior from one moment to the next. Desires for movement predominantly derive from negative but also positive reinforcement. Data from clinical populations with movement dysfunction or psychiatric disorders provides further evidence of these drivers of movement. Those with Restless Legs Syndrome, akathisia, tic disorders and exercise dependence all report strong urges to move and relief when it is accomplished. Motor control research has identified centers of the brain responsible for wants and urges for muscular movement. Models elaborated herein differentiate between wants, desires, urges and cravings. The WANT model (Wants and Aversions for Neuromuscular Tasks) conceptualizes desires for movement and rest as varying by magnitude, approach or avoidance-orientation (wants versus aversions) and as occupying independent dimensions instead of opposite ends of the same axis. For instance, one hypothetically might be in a state of both high desire for movement and rest simultaneously. Variations in motivation states to move and rest may also be associated with various stress states, like freezing or fight and flight. The first validated instrument to measure feelings of desire/want for movement and rest, the CRAVE Scale (Cravings for Rest and Volitional Energy Expenditure) is already shedding light on the nature of these states. With these advances in theory, conceptual modeling and instrumentation, future investigations may explore the effects of desires and urges for movement and sedentary behavior in earnest.

          Related collections

          Most cited references167

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior

            Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction.

              This paper presents a biopsychological theory of drug addiction, the 'Incentive-Sensitization Theory'. The theory addresses three fundamental questions. The first is: why do addicts crave drugs? That is, what is the psychological and neurobiological basis of drug craving? The second is: why does drug craving persist even after long periods of abstinence? The third is whether 'wanting' drugs (drug craving) is attributable to 'liking' drugs (to the subjective pleasurable effects of drugs)? The theory posits the following. (1) Addictive drugs share the ability to enhance mesotelencephalic dopamine neurotransmission. (2) One psychological function of this neural system is to attribute 'incentive salience' to the perception and mental representation of events associated with activation of the system. Incentive salience is a psychological process that transforms the perception of stimuli, imbuing them with salience, making them attractive, 'wanted', incentive stimuli. (3) In some individuals the repeated use of addictive drugs produces incremental neuroadaptations in this neural system, rendering it increasingly and perhaps permanently, hypersensitive ('sensitized') to drugs and drug-associated stimuli. The sensitization of dopamine systems is gated by associative learning, which causes excessive incentive salience to be attributed to the act of drug taking and to stimuli associated with drug taking. It is specifically the sensitization of incentive salience, therefore, that transforms ordinary 'wanting' into excessive drug craving. (4) It is further proposed that sensitization of the neural systems responsible for incentive salience ('for wanting') can occur independently of changes in neural systems that mediate the subjective pleasurable effects of drugs (drug 'liking') and of neural systems that mediate withdrawal. Thus, sensitization of incentive salience can produce addictive behavior (compulsive drug seeking and drug taking) even if the expectation of drug pleasure or the aversive properties of withdrawal are diminished and even in the face of strong disincentives, including the loss of reputation, job, home and family. We review evidence for this view of addiction and discuss its implications for understanding the psychology and neurobiology of addiction.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                06 November 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 568390
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Bariatric and Minimally Invasive Surgery Program, Yale-New Haven Hospital , New Haven, CT, United States
                [2] 2Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University , New York, NY, United States
                [3] 3Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin , Austin, TX, United States
                [4] 4Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Northern Illinois University , DeKalb, IL, United States
                [5] 5Pain Research, Informatics, Multi-morbidities, and Education (PRIME), VA Connecticut Healthcare System , West Haven, CT, United States
                [6] 6Center for Medical Informatics, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, United States
                [7] 7Department of Psychology, Southern Connecticut State University , New Haven, CT, United States
                [8] 8Yale Stress Center, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Ryan E. Rhodes, University of Victoria, Canada

                Reviewed by: Austin Baldwin, Southern Methodist University, United States; Andreas Ivarsson, Halmstad University, Sweden

                *Correspondence: Matthew A. Stults-Kolehmainen, matthew.stults-kolehmainen@ 123456ynhh.org

                This article was submitted to Movement Science and Sport Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568390
                7677192
                33240154
                eafcb68e-b4c2-4328-998e-52bfd2cb3f63
                Copyright © 2020 Stults-Kolehmainen, Blacutt, Bartholomew, Gilson, Ash, McKee and Sinha.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 01 June 2020
                : 16 October 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 168, Pages: 17, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Conceptual Analysis

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                urge for movement,desire,physical activity,exercise,motivation,sedentary activity,motivation states,conceptual analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article