11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      SEIPS 3.0: Human-centered design of the patient journey for patient safety

      , , , ,
      Applied Ergonomics
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) and SEIPS 2.0 models provide a framework for integrating HFE in health care quality and patient safety improvement. As care becomes increasingly distributed over space and time, the “process” component of the SEIPS model needs to evolve and represent this additional complexity. In this paper, we review different ways that the process component of the SEIPS models have been described and applied. We then propose the SEIPS 3.0 model, which expands the process component, using the concept of the patient journey to describe the spatio-temporal distribution of patients’ interactions with multiple care settings over time. This new SEIPS 3.0 sociotechnical systems approach to the patient journey and patient safety poses several conceptual and methodological challenges to HFE researchers and professionals, including the need to consider multiple perspectives, issues with genuine participation, and HFE work at the boundaries.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Applied Ergonomics
          Applied Ergonomics
          Elsevier BV
          00036870
          April 2020
          April 2020
          : 84
          : 103033
          Article
          10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103033
          7152782
          31987516
          eab75688-a5c0-4e45-8374-894584938611
          © 2020

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article