4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An Editorial on Revolutionizing Urinary Care in Pakistan by Embracing the United Kingdom National Health Service Approach to Catheterisation Documentation and Trial Without Catheter

      editorial

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This editorial highlights the importance of catheterisation documentation and the practice of trials without catheters in improving patient outcomes in Pakistan. Acute urinary retention, a major urological emergency, needs short-term catheter placement, with a trial without a catheter used globally to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections. This procedure, often enhanced by alpha-1 blockers, enables patients to regain continence and promotes micturition post-catheterisation, particularly useful following surgeries such as prostatectomy. However, trials without catheters remain underutilised in Pakistan, particularly outside urology departments, potentially leading to severe complications such as acute renal failure and urosepsis. Accurate documentation of catheterisation details, including catheter size, insertion time, clinical indications, and any complications, is paramount for minimising risks and improving continuity of care. A clinical audit led by Dr. Syed Haseeb Ullah Jan Bacha at Eastbourne District General Hospital highlighted critical gaps in catheterisation documentation, revealing lapses in recording crucial parameters like bladder scan volumes and staff names. Recommendations from the audit, including educational interventions and system improvements, necessitate the need for precise record-keeping, a practice standard in the United Kingdom but lacking in Pakistan. Introducing trial without catheter (TWOC) and documentation practices can elevate patient safety and foster a culture of continuous improvement in Pakistan’s healthcare system.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Management of acute urinary retention: a worldwide survey of 6074 men with benign prostatic hyperplasia

          OBJECTIVES To evaluate the management of acute urinary retention (AUR) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in real-life practice. To identify predictors of successful trial without catheter (TWOC). MATERIALS AND METHODS In all, 6074 men catheterized for painful AUR were enrolled in a prospective, cross-sectional survey conducted in public and private urology practices in France, Asia, Latin America, Algeria and the Middle East. Patient clinical characteristics, type of AUR and its management (type of catheterization, hospitalization, TWOC, use of α1-blockers, immediate or elective surgery) and adverse events observed during the catheterization period were recorded. Predictors of TWOC success were also analysed by multivariate regression analysis with stepwise procedure. RESULTS Of the 6074 men, 4289 (71%) had a spontaneous AUR and 1785 (29%) had a precipitated AUR, mainly as the result of loco-regional/general anaesthesia (28.5%) and excessive alcohol intake (18.2%). Presence of BPH was revealed by AUR in 44% of men. Hospitalization for AUR varied between countries, ranging from 1.7% in Algeria to 100% in France. A urethral catheter was inserted in most cases (89.8%) usually followed by a TWOC (78.0%) after a median of 5 days. Overall TWOC success rate was 61%. Most men (86%) received an α1-blocker (mainly alfuzosin) before catheter removal with consistently higher TWOC success rates, regardless of age and type of AUR. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed that α1-blocker before TWOC doubled the chances of success (odds ratio 1.92, 95% CI 1.52–2.42, P 3 days did not influence TWOC success but was associated with increased morbidity and prolonged hospitalization for adverse events. In the case of TWOC failure, 49% of men were recatheterized and had BPH surgery and 43.5% tried another TWOC with a success rate of 29.5%. Elective surgery was preferred to immediate surgery. CONCLUSIONS TWOC has become a standard practice worldwide for men with BPH and AUR. In most cases, an α1-blocker is prescribed before TWOC and significantly increases the chance of success. Prolonged catheterization is associated with an increased morbidity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Management of acute urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia in the UK: a national survey.

            To analyse current practice in the management of acute urinary retention (AUR) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in the UK, and to assess how much of this is evidence-based. In all, 410 consultant urologists practising in UK hospitals were sent a questionnaire about the management of AUR secondary to BPH. Data were collected on practice relating to initial management, trial without catheter (TWOC), the use of alpha-blockers and the follow-up. The need for a uniform guideline in the management of AUR secondary to BPH was also assessed. We received 270 (66%) replies, of which six were excluded because they were from subspeciality interests (e.g. paediatric urology) or had ambiguous answers; 264 (64%) were therefore available for analysis. Urethral catheterization was the initial management of choice (98%), failing which a suprapubic catheter was inserted. Two-thirds (65.5%) admitted the patient after catheterization. Most consultants initiated alpha-blockers (70.5%), with 64% (118) of these using a TWOC 2 days after starting them. One failed TWOC was an indication for transurethral resection of the prostate for 192 (72.8%), with 136 (49.8%) re-admitting the patient for surgery later. Routine follow-up after a successful TWOC was advocated by 77.3%. Just over half the respondents (52.6%) felt that there was no need for uniform guidelines in the management of AUR secondary to BPH. This survey identified a reasonable national uniformity in managing AUR secondary to BPH in the UK, but significant aspects of current practice are not evidence-based.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Urinary retention.

              Urinary retention, defined as the inability to void, is a common medical problem. If unidentified and/or untreated, it may become a serious condition that can lead to kidney damage or urosepsis, compromising the patient's life.
Acute urinary retention (AUR) is usually easy to identify and to treat as patients usually complain of hypogastric pain and anuria. Proper bladder drainage with urethral or suprapubic catheter is the first line of treatment, with posterior studies to determine the cause of retention.
Chronic urinary retention (CUR) is often much more difficult to identify. It is invariably linked to increased post-void residual urine (PVR), but its asymptomatic nature makes it often a hidden condition.
There is a wide range of intrinsic and extrinsic, obstructive and non-obstructive causes affecting the lower urinary tract, which can lead to urinary retention. Due to the differences in urinary physiology and in order to simplify diagnosis and management, these are usually studied separately in men and in women. Management consists of a variety of options depending on the cause of retention, including conservative treatment, drug therapy and several forms of surgery. 
In this review, we make an overview of the main causes of acute and chronic urinary retention in men and women, focusing on the main aspects of diagnosis and management.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cureus
                Cureus
                2168-8184
                Cureus
                Cureus (Palo Alto (CA) )
                2168-8184
                7 November 2024
                November 2024
                : 16
                : 11
                : e73243
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Medicine, East Sussex Healthcare National Health Service Trust, East Sussex, GBR
                [2 ] Physiology, Abbottabad International Medical Institute, Abbottabad, PAK
                [3 ] Medicine, Lady Reading Hospital Medical Teaching Institution, Peshawar, PAK
                Author notes
                Article
                10.7759/cureus.73243
                11625511
                39655121
                e8815b38-3002-4b3a-8577-ce948195abbb
                Copyright © 2024, Bacha et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 7 November 2024
                Categories
                Urology
                Internal Medicine
                Nephrology

                acute urinary retention (aur),catherization,: clinical audit,editorial,medical documentation,nhs guidelines,pakistan,trial without catheter,uk - united kingdom,urinary catheter

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content210

                Most referenced authors66