5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Added value of chest CT in a machine learning-based prediction model to rule out COVID-19 before inpatient admission: a retrospective university network study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, hospitals still face the challenge of timely identification of infected individuals before inpatient admission. An artificial intelligence approach based on an established clinical network may improve prospective pandemic preparedness.

          Method

          Supervised machine learning was used to construct diagnostic models to predict COVID-19. A pooled database was retrospectively generated from 4437 participant data that were collected between January 2017 and October 2020 at 12 German centers that belong to the radiological cooperative network of the COVID-19 (RACOON) consortium. A total of 692 (15.6%) participants were COVID-19 positive according to the reference of the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction test. The diagnostic models included chest CT features (model R), clinical examination and laboratory test features (model CL), or all three feature categories (model RCL). Performance outcomes included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC).

          Results

          Performance of predictive models improved significantly by adding chest CT features to clinical evaluation and laboratory test features. Without (model CL) and with inclusion of chest CT (model RCL), sensitivity was 0.82 and 0.89 (p < 0.0001), specificity was 0.84 and 0.89 (p < 0.0001), negative predictive value was 0.96 and 0.97 (p < 0.0001), AUC was 0.92 and 0.95 (p < 0.0001), and proportion of false negative classifications was 2.6% and 1.7% (p < 0.0001), respectively.

          Conclusions

          Addition of chest CT features to machine learning-based predictive models improves the effectiveness in ruling out COVID-19 before inpatient admission to regular wards.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study

          Summary Background A cluster of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were successively reported in Wuhan, China. We aimed to describe the CT findings across different timepoints throughout the disease course. Methods Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (confirmed by next-generation sequencing or RT-PCR) who were admitted to one of two hospitals in Wuhan and who underwent serial chest CT scans were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were grouped on the basis of the interval between symptom onset and the first CT scan: group 1 (subclinical patients; scans done before symptom onset), group 2 (scans done ≤1 week after symptom onset), group 3 (>1 week to 2 weeks), and group 4 (>2 weeks to 3 weeks). Imaging features and their distribution were analysed and compared across the four groups. Findings 81 patients admitted to hospital between Dec 20, 2019, and Jan 23, 2020, were retrospectively enrolled. The cohort included 42 (52%) men and 39 (48%) women, and the mean age was 49·5 years (SD 11·0). The mean number of involved lung segments was 10·5 (SD 6·4) overall, 2·8 (3·3) in group 1, 11·1 (5·4) in group 2, 13·0 (5·7) in group 3, and 12·1 (5·9) in group 4. The predominant pattern of abnormality observed was bilateral (64 [79%] patients), peripheral (44 [54%]), ill-defined (66 [81%]), and ground-glass opacification (53 [65%]), mainly involving the right lower lobes (225 [27%] of 849 affected segments). In group 1 (n=15), the predominant pattern was unilateral (nine [60%]) and multifocal (eight [53%]) ground-glass opacities (14 [93%]). Lesions quickly evolved to bilateral (19 [90%]), diffuse (11 [52%]) ground-glass opacity predominance (17 [81%]) in group 2 (n=21). Thereafter, the prevalence of ground-glass opacities continued to decrease (17 [57%] of 30 patients in group 3, and five [33%] of 15 in group 4), and consolidation and mixed patterns became more frequent (12 [40%] in group 3, eight [53%] in group 4). Interpretation COVID-19 pneumonia manifests with chest CT imaging abnormalities, even in asymptomatic patients, with rapid evolution from focal unilateral to diffuse bilateral ground-glass opacities that progressed to or co-existed with consolidations within 1–3 weeks. Combining assessment of imaging features with clinical and laboratory findings could facilitate early diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. Funding None.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The Appropriate Use of Testing for COVID-19

              Tony Zitek (2020)
              Many public officials are calling for increased testing for the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and some governments have taken extraordinary measures to increase the availability of testing. However, little has been published about the sensitivity and specificity of the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) nasopharyngeal swabs that are commonly used for testing. This narrative review evaluates the literature regarding the accuracy of these tests, and makes recommendations based on this literature. In brief, a negative RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swab test is insufficient to rule out COVID-19. Thus, over-reliance on the results of the test may be dangerous, and the push for widespread testing may be overstated.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur J Radiol
                Eur J Radiol
                European Journal of Radiology
                The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.
                0720-048X
                1872-7727
                7 April 2023
                7 April 2023
                : 110827
                Affiliations
                Department of Radiology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany
                [1]

                RACOON consortium: Alexander Gussew, Alexander König, Alexey Surov, Andreas Bucher, Andreas Mahnken, Arno Bücker, Bernd Hamm, Birte Valentin, Christian Stroszczynski, Christiane Kuhl, Christoph Düber, Christopher Kloth, Daniel Kütting, David Maintz, Elmar Kotter, Evelyn Bohrer, Fabian Bamberg, Felix Güttler, Felix Meinel, Florian Schwarz, Frank Wacker, Frederik Kostka, Gabriele Krombach, Gerald Antoch, Gerhard Adam, Gudrun Borte, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Hinrich Winther, Jens Kleesiek, Jens Ricke, Jens-Peter Kühn, Joachim Lotz, Jörg Barkhausen, Kersten Peldschus, Konstantin Nikolaou, Maciej Pech, Malte Sieren, Marc-André Weber, Marcus Both, Marcus Makowski, Matthias Fink, Matthias Frölich, Matthias May, Meinrad Beer, Michael Forsting, Michael Ingrisch, Michael Uder, Norbert Hosten, Okka Hamer, Olav Jansen, Peter Isfort, Philipp Josef Kuhl, Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann, Rickmer Braren, Robert Rischen, Roman Klöckner, Saheeb Ahmed, Saif Afat, Simon Pätzholz, Stefan Schönberg, Thomas Kröncke, Thomas Vogl, Thorsten Bley, Thorsten Persigehl, Timm Denecke, Tobias Penzkofer, Ulf Teichgräber, Ulrike Attenberger, Volkmar Nicolas, Walter Heindel, Walter Wohlgemuth

                Article
                S0720-048X(23)00141-9 110827
                10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110827
                10080860
                e83a9d26-9218-42f5-ad8a-2d5ba0ee315e
                © 2023 The Author(s)

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 21 January 2023
                : 28 March 2023
                : 4 April 2023
                Categories
                Article

                Radiology & Imaging
                artificial intelligence,computed tomography,covid-19,machine learning,predictive value of tests

                Comments

                Comment on this article