3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Peritoneal dissemination of pancreatic cancer caused by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: A case report and literature review

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a biopsy technique widely used to diagnose pancreatic tumors because of its high sensitivity and specificity. Although needle-tract seeding caused by EUS-FNA has been recently reported, dissemination of pancreatic cancer cells is generally considered to be a rare complication that does not affect patient prognosis. However, the frequency of dissemination and needle-tract seeding appears to have been underestimated. We present a case of peritoneal dissemination of pancreatic cancer due to preoperative EUS-FNA.

          CASE SUMMARY

          An 81-year-old man was referred to the Department of Surgery of our hospital in Japan owing to the detection of a pancreatic mass on computed tomography during medical screening. Trans-gastric EUS-FNA revealed that the mass was an adenocarcinoma; hence laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with lympha-denectomy was performed. No intraoperative peritoneal dissemination and liver metastasis were visually detected, and pelvic lavage cytology was negative for carcinoma cells. The postoperative surgical specimen was negative for carcinoma cells at the dissected margin and the cut end margin; however, pathological findings revealed adenocarcinoma cells on the peritoneal surface proximal to the needle puncture site, and the cells were suspected to be disseminated via EUS- FNA. Hence, the patient received adjuvant therapy with S-1 (tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium); however, computed tomography performed 5 mo after surgery revealed liver metastasis and cancerous peritonitis. The patient received palliative therapy and died 8 mo after the operation.

          CONCLUSION

          The indications of EUS-FNA should be carefully considered to avoid iatrogenic dissemination, especially for cancers in the pancreatic body or tail.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Randomized phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer (Prep-02/JSAP05)

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            How good is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass?: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

            The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass. Data extracted from EUS-FNA studies with a criterion standard (either confirmed by surgery or appropriate follow-up) were selected. Articles were searched in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials & Database of Systematic Reviews. Pooling was conducted by both fixed- and random-effects models. Initial search identified 3610 reference articles, of these 360 relevant articles were selected and reviewed. Data were extracted from 41 studies (N = 4766) which met the inclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivity of EUS-FNA in diagnosing the correct etiology for solid pancreatic mass was 86.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.5-87.9). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA had a pooled specificity of 95.8% (95% CI, 94.6-96.7). Positive likelihood ratio of EUS was 15.2 (95% CI, 8.5-27.3), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.17 (95% CI, 0.13-0.21). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA is an excellent diagnostic tool to detect the correct etiology for solid pancreatic masses. When available, EUS-FNA should be strongly considered as the first diagnostic tool for sampling these lesions to optimize patient management.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis.

              Preoperative diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions remains challenging despite advancement in imaging technologies. EUS has the benefit of being a minimally invasive, well-tolerated procedure, although results are operator-dependent. The addition of FNA (EUS-guided FNA) provides samples for cytopathologic analysis, a major advantage over other imaging techniques. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA for pancreatic cancer. This is a meta-analysis of published studies assessing the diagnostic capability of EUS-FNA. Relevant studies were identified via MEDLINE and were included if they used a reference standard of definitive surgical histology or clinical follow-up of at least 6 months. Data from selected studies were analyzed by using test accuracy meta-analysis software, providing a pooled value for sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristic curve. Cytology results were classified as inadequate, benign, atypical, suspicious, or malignant. Predefined subgroup analysis was performed. Thirty-three studies published between 1997 and 2009 were included, with a total number of 4984 patients. The pooled sensitivity for malignant cytology was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84-86), and pooled specificity was 98% (95% CI, 0.97-0.99). If atypical and suspicious cytology results were included to determine true neoplasms, the sensitivity increased to 91% (95% CI, 90-92); however, the specificity was reduced to 94% (95% CI, 93-96). The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA was enhanced in prospective, multicenter studies. Publication bias was not a significant determinant of pooled accuracy. This meta-analysis demonstrates that EUS-FNA is a highly accurate diagnostic test for solid neoplasms of the pancreas and should be considered when algorithms for investigating solid pancreatic lesions are being planned. Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                World J Gastroenterol
                World J Gastroenterol
                WJG
                World Journal of Gastroenterology
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                1007-9327
                2219-2840
                21 January 2021
                21 January 2021
                : 27
                : 3
                : 294-304
                Affiliations
                Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
                Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan. dragonpegasus@ 123456keio.jp
                Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
                Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
                Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
                Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
                Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
                Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
                Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
                Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
                Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
                Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
                Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
                Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
                Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
                Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
                Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
                Author notes

                Author contributions: Kojima H interpreted the patient data based on the case notes and drafted the manuscript; Kitago M performed the surgery and supervised the manuscript; Masugi Y, Ohara Y, and Sakamoto M evaluated the pathological findings; all other members equally contributed to the medical treatment.

                Corresponding author: Minoru Kitago, PhD, Reader (Associate Professor), Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan. dragonpegasus@ 123456keio.jp

                Article
                jWJG.v27.i3.pg294
                10.3748/wjg.v27.i3.294
                7814364
                33519143
                e6fca1c8-289b-4e13-a6f4-609919841424
                ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 5 December 2020
                : 28 December 2020
                : 6 January 2021
                Categories
                Case Report

                case report,pancreatic carcinoma,endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration,peritoneal dissemination,cancerous peritonitis,biopsy

                Comments

                Comment on this article