5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impaired Gut–Systemic Signaling Drives Total Parenteral Nutrition-Associated Injury

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) provides all nutritional needs intravenously. Although lifesaving, enthusiasm is significantly tempered due to side effects of liver and gut injury, as well as lack of mechanistic understanding into drivers of TPN injury. We hypothesized that the state of luminal nutritional deprivation with TPN drives alterations in gut–systemic signaling, contributing to injury, and tested this hypothesis using our ambulatory TPN model. Methods: A total of 16 one-week-old piglets were allocated randomly to TPN ( n = 8) or enteral nutrition (EN, n = 8) for 3 weeks. Liver, gut, and serum were analyzed. All tests were two-sided, with a significance level of 0.05. Results: TPN resulted in significant hyperbilirubinemia and cholestatic liver injury, p = 0.034. Hepatic inflammation (cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3) immunohistochemistry) was higher with TPN ( p = 0.021). No significant differences in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or bile ductular proliferation were noted. TPN resulted in reduction of muscularis mucosa thickness and marked gut atrophy. Median and interquartile range for gut mass was 0.46 (0.30–0.58) g/cm in EN, and 0.19 (0.11–0.29) g/cm in TPN ( p = 0.024). Key gut–systemic signaling regulators, liver farnesoid X receptor (FXR; p = 0.021), liver constitutive androstane receptor (CAR; p = 0.014), gut FXR ( p = 0.028), G-coupled bile acid receptor (TGR5) ( p = 0.003), epidermal growth factor (EGF; p = 0.016), organic anion transporter (OAT; p = 0.028), Mitogen-activated protein kinases-1 (MAPK1) ( p = 0.037), and sodium uptake transporter sodium glucose-linked transporter (SGLT-1; p = 0.010) were significantly downregulated in TPN animals, whereas liver cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase (CyP7A1) was substantially higher with TPN ( p = 0.011). Conclusion: We report significant alterations in key hepatobiliary receptors driving gut–systemic signaling in a TPN piglet model. This presents a major advancement to our understanding of TPN-associated injury and suggests opportunities for strategic targeting of the gut–systemic axis, specifically, FXR, TGR5, and EGF in developing ameliorative strategies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Identification of a nuclear receptor for bile acids.

          Bile acids are essential for the solubilization and transport of dietary lipids and are the major products of cholesterol catabolism. Results presented here show that bile acids are physiological ligands for the farnesoid X receptor (FXR), an orphan nuclear receptor. When bound to bile acids, FXR repressed transcription of the gene encoding cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase, which is the rate-limiting enzyme in bile acid synthesis, and activated the gene encoding intestinal bile acid-binding protein, which is a candidate bile acid transporter. These results demonstrate a mechanism by which bile acids transcriptionally regulate their biosynthesis and enterohepatic transport.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Lipotoxicity and the gut-liver axis in NASH pathogenesis.

            The pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, particularly the mechanisms whereby a minority of patients develop a more severe phenotype characterised by hepatocellular damage, inflammation, and fibrosis is still incompletely understood. Herein, we discuss two pivotal aspects of the pathogenesis of NASH. We first analyse the initial mechanisms responsible for hepatocellular damage and inflammation, which derive from the toxic effects of excess lipids. Accumulating data indicate that the total amount of triglycerides stored in hepatocytes is not the major determinant of lipotoxicity, and that specific lipid classes act as damaging agents on liver cells. In particular, the role of free fatty acids such as palmitic acid, cholesterol, lysophosphatidylcholine and ceramides has recently emerged. These lipotoxic agents affect the cell behaviour via multiple mechanisms, including activation of signalling cascades and death receptors, endoplasmic reticulum stress, modification of mitochondrial function, and oxidative stress. In the second part of this review, the cellular and molecular players involved in the cross-talk between the gut and the liver are considered. These include modifications to the microbiota, which provide signals through the intestine and bacterial products, as well as hormones produced in the bowel that affect metabolism at different levels including the liver. Finally, the activation of nuclear receptors by bile acids is analysed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The bile acid TGR5 membrane receptor: from basic research to clinical application.

              The TGR5 receptor (or GP-BAR1, or M-BAR) was characterized ten years ago as the first identified G-coupled protein receptor specific for bile acids. TGR5 gene expression is widely distributed, including endocrine glands, adipocytes, muscles, immune organs, spinal cord, and the enteric nervous system. The effect of TGR5 activation depends on the tissue where it is expressed and the signalling cascade that it induces. Animal studies suggest that TGR5 activation influences energy production and thereby may be involved in obesity and diabetes. TGR5 activation also influences intestinal motility. This review provides an overview of TGR5-bile acid interactions in health as well as the possible involvement of TGR5 in human disease.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nutrients
                Nutrients
                nutrients
                Nutrients
                MDPI
                2072-6643
                20 May 2020
                May 2020
                : 12
                : 5
                : 1493
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pathology at Saint Louis University School of Medicine, SSM Cardinal Glennon Hospital, 1465 South Grand Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63104, USA; miguel.guzman@ 123456health.slu.edu (M.G.); sherri.besmer@ 123456health.slu.edu (S.B.)
                [2 ]Department of Pediatrics at Saint Louis University School of Medicine, SSM Cardinal Glennon Hospital, 1465 South Grand Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63104, USA; chandrashekhara.manithody@ 123456health.slu.edu (C.M.); joseph.krebs@ 123456health.slu.edu (J.K.); christine.denton@ 123456health.slu.edu (C.D.); pranjali.rajalakshmi@ 123456slu.edu (P.R.); sonalij23@ 123456gmail.com (S.J.)
                [3 ]Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 1402 South Grand Blvd. St. Louis, MO 63104, USA; villalog@ 123456icloud.com
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7166-3413
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9420-5722
                Article
                nutrients-12-01493
                10.3390/nu12051493
                7284746
                32443928
                e6a9ab3f-8f11-4685-8fee-07ef885c8a57
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 30 March 2020
                : 13 May 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Nutrition & Dietetics
                parenteral nutrition,liver disease,gut injury,gut–systemic crosstalk,hepato-biliary receptors and transporters

                Comments

                Comment on this article