10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Measurement of Longitudinal β-Amyloid Change with 18F-Florbetapir PET and Standardized Uptake Value Ratios

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The accurate measurement of β-amyloid (Aβ) change using amyloid PET imaging is important for Alzheimer disease research and clinical trials but poses several unique challenges. In particular, reference region measurement instability may lead to spurious changes in cortical regions of interest. To optimize our ability to measure 18F-florbetapir longitudinal change, we evaluated several candidate regions of interest and their influence on cortical florbetapir change over a 2-y period in participants from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI).

          Methods

          We examined the agreement in cortical florbetapir change detected using 6 candidate reference regions (cerebellar gray matter, whole cerebellum, brain stem/pons, eroded subcortical white matter [WM], and 2 additional combinations of these regions) in 520 ADNI subjects. We used concurrent cerebrospinal fluid Aβ 1–42 measurements to identify subgroups of ADNI subjects expected to remain stable over follow-up (stable Aβ group; n = 14) and subjects expected to increase (increasing Aβ group; n = 91). We then evaluated reference regions according to whether cortical change was minimal in the stable Aβ group and cortical retention increased in the increasing Aβ group.

          Results

          There was poor agreement across reference regions in the amount of cortical change observed across all 520 ADNI subjects. Within the stable Aβ group, however, cortical florbetapir change was 1%–2% across all reference regions, indicating high consistency. In the increasing Aβ group, cortical increases were significant with all reference regions. Reference regions containing WM (as opposed to cerebellum or pons) enabled detection of cortical change that was more physiologically plausible and more likely to increase over time.

          Conclusion

          Reference region selection has an important influence on the detection of florbetapir change. Compared with cerebellum or pons alone, reference regions that included subcortical WM resulted in change measurements that are more accurate. In addition, because use of WM-containing reference regions involves dividing out cortical signal contained in the reference region (via partial-volume effects), use of these WM-containing regions may result in more conservative estimates of actual change. Future analyses using different tracers, tracer–kinetic models, pipelines, and comparisons with other biomarkers will further optimize our ability to accurately measure Aβ changes over time.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          0217410
          5045
          J Nucl Med
          J. Nucl. Med.
          Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
          0161-5505
          1535-5667
          5 February 2017
          05 March 2015
          April 2015
          17 February 2017
          : 56
          : 4
          : 567-574
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California
          [2 ]Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California
          [3 ]Radiology Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
          [4 ]Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
          [5 ]Banner Alzheimer’s Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
          Author notes
          For correspondence or reprints contact: Susan M. Landau, 118 Barker Hall MC #3190, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3190. slandau@ 123456berkeley.edu
          Article
          PMC5313473 PMC5313473 5313473 nihpa847898
          10.2967/jnumed.114.148981
          5313473
          25745095
          e5b098da-1377-4070-9207-4d5c41790738
          History
          Categories
          Article

          amyloid,PET imaging,Alzheimer’s disease
          amyloid, PET imaging, Alzheimer’s disease

          Comments

          Comment on this article