Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Autoeficacia y estilos de afrontamiento al estrés en estudiantes universitarios. Translated title: Self-efficacy and stress coping styles in university students

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumen: La presente investigación analizóla relación entre los niveles de Autoeficacia presentes en estudiantes universitarios y los Estilos de Afrontamiento al Estrés utilizados para hacer frente a demandas internas y externas. Se seleccionó una muestra de 126 estudiantes a quienes se les administró la Escala de Autoeficacia General, el Cuestionario de Estilos de Afrontamiento al Estrés y un cuestionario sociodemográfico. Los resultados indican que quienes presentan un mayor nivel de Autoeficacia utilizan los Estilos de Afrontamiento al Estrés Focalizado en la solución del problema y Reevaluación positiva. Por otro lado, quienes presentaron menor nivel de Autoeficacia recurren al estilo de afrontamiento Autofocalización negativa

          Translated abstract

          Abstract: The present investigation analyzed the relationship between the levels of Self efficacy that students of the bachelor´s degree on Psychology have and the Coping Styles that they use to face internal or external requests. A sample of 126 students was selected. They were given the General Self Efficacy Scale, the Coping Strategies Questionnaire and a social demographic questionnaire. The results show that those students that have more Self-efficacy use the Coping Strategy focused on solving the problem and Positive reappraisal. On the other hand, students that have lower Self-efficacy levels use the Negative self-blameway of coping with stress.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A power primer.

          One possible reason for the continued neglect of statistical power analysis in research in the behavioral sciences is the inaccessibility of or difficulty with the standard material. A convenient, although not comprehensive, presentation of required sample sizes is provided here. Effect-size indexes and conventional values for these are given for operationally defined small, medium, and large effects. The sample sizes necessary for .80 power to detect effects at these levels are tabled for eight standard statistical tests: (a) the difference between independent means, (b) the significance of a product-moment correlation, (c) the difference between independent rs, (d) the sign test, (e) the difference between independent proportions, (f) chi-square tests for goodness of fit and contingency tables, (g) one-way analysis of variance, and (h) the significance of a multiple or multiple partial correlation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct.

            (1992)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Psychological testing and psychological assessment. A review of evidence and issues.

              This article summarizes evidence and issues associated with psychological assessment. Data from more than 125 meta-analyses on test validity and 800 samples examining multimethod assessment suggest 4 general conclusions: (a) Psychological test validity is strong and compelling, (b) psychological test validity is comparable to medical test validity, (c) distinct assessment methods provide unique sources of information, and (d) clinicians who rely exclusively on interviews are prone to incomplete understandings. Following principles for optimal nomothetic research, the authors suggest that a multimethod assessment battery provides a structured means for skilled clinicians to maximize the validity of individualized assessments. Future investigations should move beyond an examination of test scales to focus more on the role of psychologists who use tests as helpful tools to furnish patients and referral sources with professional consultation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                cp
                Ciencias Psicológicas
                Cienc. Psicol.
                Universidad Católica del Uruguay. Facultad de Psicología. (Montevideo, , Uruguay )
                1688-4094
                1688-4221
                May 2018
                : 12
                : 1
                : 17-23
                Affiliations
                [2] Buenos Aires orgnameConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas orgdiv1Instituto de Investigaciones en Psicología de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) Argentina lic_pablodepaula@ 123456yahoo.com.ar
                [1] orgnameUniversidad Abierta Interamericana orgdiv1Facultad de Psicología y Relaciones Humanas Argentina luciapiergiovanni@ 123456live.com.ar
                Article
                S1688-42212018000100017
                10.22235/cp.v12i1.1591
                e5ad6c07-ce79-4ec5-9d02-87de8de8f8d2

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 19 April 2017
                : 22 February 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 30, Pages: 7
                Product

                SciELO Uruguay


                University Students,Stress Coping Styles,Self-efficacy,Estudiantes Universitarios,Estilos de Afrontamiento al Estrés,Autoeficacia

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content1,496

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors263