29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of antigen detection and polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of amoebic liver abscess in patients on anti-amoebic treatment

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Diagnosis of amoebic liver abscess (ALA) in patients on anti-amoebic drugs is difficult. There is scanty data on this issue using Entamoeba histolytica ( E. histolytica) lectin antigen and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We studied utility of lectin antigen, PCR, and IgG antibody in diagnosis of liver abscess in patients on anti-amoebic treatment. Liver aspirate of 200 patients, of which 170 had anti-amoebic drug prior to drainage, was tested for E. histolytica lectin antigen by (ELISA), PCR, bacterial culture, and serum IgG antibody by (ELISA). Classification of abscesses was based on result of anti-amoebic IgG antibody and bacterial culture, E. histolytica PCR and bacterial culture, and E. histolytica lectin antigen and bacterial culture.

          Findings

          Using anti-amoebic IgG antibody and bacterial culture, 136/200 (68.0%) were classified as ALA, 12/200 (6.0%) as pyogenic liver abscess (PLA), 29/200 (14.5%) as mixed infection, and 23/200 (11.5%) remained unclassified. Using amoebic PCR and bacterial culture 151/200 (75.5%) were classified as ALA, 25/200 (12.5%) as PLA, 16/200 (8.0%) as mixed infection, and 8/200 (4.0%) remained unclassified. With E. histolytica lectin antigen and bacterial culture, 22/200 (11.0%) patients were classified as ALA, 39/200 (19.5%) as PLA, 2/200 (1.0%) as mixed infection, and 137/200 (68.5%) remained unclassified.

          Conclusions

          E. histolytica lectin antigen was not suitable for classification of ALA patients who had prior anti-amoebic treatment. However, PCR may be used as alternative test to anti-amoebic antibody in diagnosis of ALA.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Statistics review 13: Receiver operating characteristic curves

          This review introduces some commonly used methods for assessing the performance of a diagnostic test. The sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio of a test are discussed. The uses of the receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve are explained.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Amoebiasis.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Comparison of PCR, isoenzyme analysis, and antigen detection for diagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica infection.

              The diagnosis of amebiasis by microscopic identification of the parasite in stool is insensitive and unable to distinguish the invasive parasite Entamoeba histolytica from the commensal parasite E. dispar. In this study, we have tested a PCR technique for the detection of E. histolytica and compared it with isoenzyme analysis and the TechLab E. histolytica-specific antigen detection test. The nested-PCR test we used is based on amplification of the small subunit rRNA gene of E. histolytica and E. dispar followed by restriction digest analysis of the PCR product. Single stool samples were obtained from 98 patients from Dhaka, Bangladesh, with diarrhea: 88 patients diagnosed by microscopy and/or culture with E. histolytica and/or E. dispar infection and 10 patients without infection. Isoenzyme analysis identified 53 of the infections as E. histolytica and 28 as E. dispar. PCR and isoenzyme identification of E. histolytica agreed in 96% (51 of 53) of amebic cultures. PCR for E. histolytica was negative in all 10 samples that were negative for E. histolytica by isoenzyme and antigen detection. PCR and antigen detection had comparable sensitivities when performed directly on fresh stool specimens, identifying 87% (46 of 53) and 85% (45 of 53), respectively, of E. histolytica infections identified by isoenzyme analysis. The correlation of results by antigen detection and PCR for identification of E. histolytica in stool was 93% (45 of 48 cases). Mixed infections with E. histolytica and E. dispar were detected by PCR in 14% (12 of 88) of cases. In conclusion, all three techniques for specific identification of E. histolytica in fresh stool showed excellent correlation. Only the TechLab E. histolytica antigen detection test was both rapid and technically simple.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Res Notes
                BMC Res Notes
                BMC Research Notes
                BioMed Central
                1756-0500
                2012
                7 August 2012
                : 5
                : 416
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India
                [2 ]Department of Radiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India
                [3 ]Department of Genetics, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India
                [4 ]Department of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India
                Article
                1756-0500-5-416
                10.1186/1756-0500-5-416
                3477060
                22870930
                e47382c0-bf17-4689-b698-314176a5612d
                Copyright ©2012 Jaiswal et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 3 May 2012
                : 16 July 2012
                Categories
                Short Report

                Medicine
                entamoeba histolytica,pyogenic liver abscess,amoebiasis,anti-amoebic igg antibody
                Medicine
                entamoeba histolytica, pyogenic liver abscess, amoebiasis, anti-amoebic igg antibody

                Comments

                Comment on this article